Insulting letters to politician’s home are constitutionally protected, unless they are ‘true threats’ – 1st Amendment

Insulting letters to politician’s home are constitutionally protected, unless they are ‘true threats’   So the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court held Tuesday in Commonwealth v. Bigelow (some paragraph breaks added): It is true that the letters were sent to Michael [Costello] at his home, a location where the homeowner’s privacy is itself entitled to constitutional protection. Cf. Rowan v. … Continue reading Insulting letters to politician’s home are constitutionally protected, unless they are ‘true threats’ – 1st Amendment