Officer Bryan Huntelman - La Habra Police Department -

Officer Bryan Huntelman OBESE GLUTTON LYING SWORN OFFICER OF THE LAW WHO FAILS TO ARREST WANTED FUGITIVE SEX OFFENDERS AT YOUR SONS HOUSE AGAINST COURT ORDERS HE COMMITS PERJURY, DELAYS & HIDES BODYCAM FOOTAGE, HE FAILES TO ARREST WHICH MEANS HE HIMSELF IS A CRIMINAL GUILTY OF PC 142 FAILURE TO ARREST AND HIS BODYCAM FOOTAGE HE FAILS TO TURN OVER PROVES THAT HIS NAME IS FAT PIG BRYAN HUNTELMAN (Brian huntleman) LHPD Scum YOU ARE NOW A FELON THAT HAS NOT BEEN PROSECUTED YET FAT BOY LOSER. THIS FUCK WAD HAS ALSO A MILLION DOLLAR HOME AND A FILING FOR BANKRUPCY YOU DO THE MATH. ANOTHER DUMB FUCKING ABUSIVE PIG, NOT A COP, COPS ARE GOOD THEY STAND FOR GOOD, OFFICER HUNTELMAN IS A PIG FUCK A FAT BROKE LYING PIG FUCK WHO PROTECTS SEX OFFENDERS AND WANTED FUGITIVES HE LOOKS LIKE A WEAK FAT TROLL La Habra Police Offcer Bryan Huntelman A Criminal Hiding and Polluting the image of LHPD Officers and the OCDA office The habra Police Department is willing to ruin their image to hide his bodycam footage. the footage is of his criminal activity part 1 La Habra Police Offcer Bryan Huntelman A Criminal at Large Bryan Huntelman a criminal cop which is what a pig is. A pig is a filthy creature that is not to be eaten or touched, it plays in its own shit! Offcer Bryan Huntelman is a dirty cop ------ Cops doings crimes = Pig rolling in Shit [embed]https://youtu.be/lIIOxrov0C4[/embed] [embed]https://youtu.be/mBsU20SDBp0?t=1423[/embed] Numbers 32:23 KJV But if ye will not do so, behold, ye have sinned against the LORD: and be sure your sin will find you out. [embed]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nJH3yMN1-wY&t=253s[/embed] Bryan Huntelman a criminal cop Who Abuse's his Sworn Oath, The Law, and Constitutional Rights of Citizens and fails to pay debts too hes filed for bankruptcy so he does not keep his word as man of debt (debtor) the MONEY MEN (creditors) DIRTY Officer acting at all PIG Huntleman aka CUNTLEMAN Lying Cocksucker Beta Bitch Male (cops do not lie they protect and serve citizens [their employers]) Officer Huntleman is so dumb he included his wife in his shenanigans We also have the Penal Code 118 PC – California Penalty of “Perjury” Law We also have the Penal Code 132 PC – Offering False Evidence We also have the Penal Code 134 PC – Preparing False Evidence We also have the Penal Code 118.1 PC – Police Officers Filing False Reports We also have the Spencer v. Peters– Police Fabrication of Evidence – 14th Amendment We also have the Penal Code 148.5 PC – Making a False Police Report in California We also have the Penal Code 115 PC – Filing a False Document in California Officer Huntleman committed PC 142 for failing to arrest Penal Code 142 PC – Peace Officer Refusing to Arrest or Receive Person Charged with Criminal Offense Penal Code 632 PC - Eavesdropping Law in California wait for the audit LHPD stay cool LEARN THE US CONSTITUION or you will be sued and lose your job like Officer Bryan Huntelman dont worry WALMART IS ALWAYS HIRING SHELF BOYS this is coming to LHPD SOON SCORES OF PEOPLE ALL AT ONCE TO AUDIT YOU! WE WILL WALK INTO YOUR LHPD LOT AND VIDEO TAPE ALL YOUR CARS EVEN THE VISIBLE UNDERCOVERS, WE WILL VIDEO TAPE ALL STAFF CARS AND LICENSE PLATES LOCATED ON THE PROPERTY THAT BELONGS TO THE TAX PAYER, WE MIGHT EVEN TIE OUR SHOES ON THE COP CAR BUMPERS, ITS OUR CARS AS WELL AND IT IS NOT ILLEGAL! SHOE HOLDERS EXPENSIVE SHOE HOLDERS Officer Bryan Huntelman is a dishonest man who lies on police reports and literally imagines fake shit, puts it down as fact. i recorded Officer Bryan Huntelman lies. Officer Bryan Huntelman is a mentally ill dellusional man or a normal liar cock sucker you chose.Officer Bryan Huntelman is broke as a joke with a disaster for a house, and has filed for bankruptcy so we do know for a fact he is incompetent with his financials. Officer Bryan Huntelman is DUMB WITH MONEY , MEANS DUMB, FLAT OUT DUMB! Officer Bryan Huntelman is 100% unfamiliar with the truth so he must be retarded and a shit back cocksucker. wait till the recordings speak the truth correctly and put you in your place for framing me you cocksucker. felony for lying on a police report multiple times but you Officer Bryan Huntelman are gonna own up to this with our recordings shit bag! [video width="640" height="360" mp4="https://goodshepherdmedia.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Kid-Rock-We-The-People-ft-Tucker-Carlson-Made-with-Clipchamp.mp4" loop="true" preload="auto"][/video] https://youtu.be/gQ-SRM1tq8k?si=kdQFE6dDKvczdOS5 [embed]https://youtu.be/HrAQcgykZTk[/embed] "The elements of a cause of action for negligence are: duty, breach of duty, legal cause, and damages. (Friedman v. Merck & Co. (2003) 107 Cal.App.4th 454, 463.)" § 42 U.S.C. 1983 for malicious prosecution Thompson v. Clark U.S. Supreme Court Rules That Favorable Termination of Charges For 4th & 14th Amendment Malicious Prosecution Claim Need Not Show Affirmative Indication of Innocence [embed]https://youtu.be/bbltqycR5BY?t=163[/embed] Officer Bryan Huntelman - La Habra Police Department LHPD - California - PEACEFUL ASSEBLY COMING SOON! WHAT TO KNOW WHAT TRUTH IS ? CLICK HERE TO LEARN MORE LYING FUCK (BTW YOU CAUGHT) THE PHOTO IS CLICK BAIT, COULD NOT FIND THIS SCUM BAG ON ANY OF LHPD COP POSTS, LOOKS LIKE HE HAS NEVER BE SOCIAL OR HAVE DOES NOT HAVE ANY OTHER COP FRIENDS THAT WANT TO BE SEEN WITH HIM. HE IS INVISIBLE PHOTO WISE. NOT EVEN ANOTHER COP WANTS TO BE NEXT TO THIS LYING PIG FUCK MAYBE THERE ARE A FEW GOOD COPS LEFT THERE AT LHPD (WE WILL FIND OUT:) , GOOD COPS AND PIGS ARE LIKE OIL AND WATER THEY DO NOT MIX [video width="640" height="360" mp4="https://goodshepherdmedia.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Apple-Think-Different.mp4" loop="true" autoplay="true"][/video] THEY GIVE LYING DUMB STOOGES like Officer Bryan Huntelman GUNS NOW A DAYS, LAME PIG LIYING SETUP ARTIST, WAIT TILL YOU GET CAUGHT IN THE WEB :) THIS COP, Officer Bryan Huntelman , IS ALSO BANKRUPT, HE FILED FOR BANKRUPTCY 2020 COULD NOT DO MATH OR FINANCE CORRECTLY EITHER BUT LYING IS SECOND NATURE. Remember his is a PIG so he has a set income, he cannot control make less than the set amount. No skill or work ethic required, and with that set number and the possibility of tons of overtime he still could not get his math right. Now if he had a 🧠 brain 🧠 (BRAINLESS BRYAN [BORN EMPTY HEADED]) Officer Bryan Huntelman WOULD HAVE ARRANGED HIS FINANCES AROUND THE SET NUMBER AS HIS MAX SPENDING AFTER TAXES. BUT... HE IS A CLASS AAA ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ LYING MORON LOSER WHO FEARS THE 1ST AMENDMENT AND MATH. DOES YOU WIFE KNOW YOU ARE THIS DUMB OR IS SHE YOUR EQUAL? [embed]https://youtu.be/eKnGga0uStk[/embed] Bryan C Huntelman is an evil master manipulator - meet and confer information below https://peacefulassembly.org/bryan-c-huntelman/ He lives here, maybe the local community should get together and let officer Bryan C Huntelman he should to resign and turn himself in for his criminal activities and negligence. We are going to be having a peaceful assembly soon, please email us to participate in your 1st amendment rights against tyrannical government. We are going to be holding a peaceful assembly in front of his home address to protest his illegal behavior and hand out leaflets and flyers. PEACEFUL ASSEBLY IN PUBLIC ON PUBLIC AREAS NOT BLOCKING ROADS AND PATHWAYS IS THE AMERICAN WAY TO DISAGREE WITH CROOKED EVIL LYING CRIMINAL GOVERNEMENT OFFICIALS WE HAVE THE RIGHT AS US CITIZENS TO PEACEFULLY ASSEMBLE QUIETLY AND NOT TRESPASS NOT BLOCK ACCESS TO ANY ROAD OR PATHWAY AND HAND OUT LEAFLETS OF TRUTHFUL INFORMATION THAT CONTAINS NEWS OF INDIVIDUALS AND THEIR TRUTHFUL ACTIONS, JUST LIKE FOX NEWS 11 AND THE BIDEN LAPTOP. BUT STILL PLEASE DONT BOTHER ANYONE HERE AT THE ADDRESS ABOVE THIS IS HOW A COP LIVES PEACEFUL PROTEST INVOLVES BEING KIND HOLDING YOUR SIGN OR LEAFLETS AND GETTING YOUR MESSAGE ACROSS. YOU CANNOT BLOCK SIDEWALK, SHE IS NOT BELOW. YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO BLOCK OTHERS MOVEMENT. SO STAY OUT OF PEOPLE'S WAY OF MOVEMENT AND BE CALM HOLD YOUR SIGN AND KEEP UP YOUR DOINGS ! "It is prosecutorial misconduct, the weaponization of the Justice System, and an attack by Radicals who desperately don't want me to have fair and adequate family law/law enforcement services. Especially based previous misconduct and dismissed PC 653 Annoying and harassing phone calls to a residence (public office isn't a residence either) against law enforcement (they were recorded and case was dismissed after blackmail was paid to the OC DA Victim Rape Victim Fund (click here to listen to to 2 calls taken over 1 year apart) cases and the recent criminal malicious prosecution of me when I complain of their negligence and their own crimes they have committed against me and my son." They even had a nice expensive run down house needing paint and lots of work, it looks like a drug addicts house. There he is living in LA with his wifes LA Phone number and then file charges in Orange County where he actually works and NOT where the proposed event happened, and file illegally charges that he was called and annoyed and now tough old copper is victim but wait...... His phone number claimed that was called belongs to his wife whom also has a LA phone number living in LA with him not orange county. as a resident of LA she was required to have filed charges with the local jurisdiction, which is LA. instead her brave husband OFFICER HUNTLEMAN LA HABRA POLICE DEPARTMENT goes to work later that week (in another county as an OC POLICE OFFICER LHPD) and illegally lies to other officers in orange county above events that occurred and who the real victim was in this proposed crime. This officer tells his work officers many false things grossly telling lies. 1. he (653 man) called me (officer) and harassed me (his wife was called on her cell) 2. he and his wife resided in LA, his wiles phone (the real person called) has an LA based number to match her LA address in LA county far from the OC county where he filed for her as himself being the victim 3. by law if your are feeling annoyed by communications you must clearly tell the other party to stop, the party must stop after 4. if you the victim (officer) call them back to speak with them then 653 does not apply when you call (653 guy) saying you want to talk 5. if your wife never told (653 guy) not to call but simply hangs up that is not clear communication to stop, this could me cell phone service failed or battery died calling back until told to stop is still legal this man was told he was being recorded, he admits in the recording his wife was called not him he also admits never telling anyone to stop, and he is made aware of his lying reports to his work officers (LHPD) outside of the jurisdiction of where the supposed proposed crime occurred. he knows jurisdiction and what a victim is but lies about both Sworn law enforcement officers are those who have taken an oath to support the Constitution of the United States, their state, and the laws of their agency’s jurisdiction. Sworn officers also have the responsibility to ensure the safety and quality of life of the communities they serve. The basic duties and types of sworn law enforcement officers are summarized below. https://www.discoverpolicing.org/explore-the-field/types-of-sworn-law-enforcement/ HOME UNKEPT! YARD UNKEPT! YET VALUED AT A MILLION, HE FELL FOR THE KEEPING UP WITH THE JONES LIFE, THE LOT IS SMALLER THAN MY HOUSE ITS BARELY 6200 sqft WHAT KIND OF MILLION DOLLAR HOME 1296SQFT??? THIS AINT BEVERLY HILLS ITS LOMITA, A CHEAP SHIT BAG LIFE OVER PAID AND WILL PAY FOR HIS LACK OF INTEGRITY AND STUPIDITY LONGER THAN HE KNOWS THIS MAN IS GOING TO TELL OTHERS HOW TO KEEP A NICE BLOCK WHEN HE SETS THE EXAMPLE OF DISREGARDED GARBAGE ASIDE FROM THAT HE LIES AND DOES NOT DO HIS JOB AND THEN BECOMES VENDICTIVE USES HIS POWER ILLEGALLY ABUSING IT AND FILES CHARGES AGAINST ME THIS DUDE SO TRASH HIS WHOLE LOT IS SMALLER THAN MY HOUSE :) SMUCK FUCK POOR TRASH WHO BREAKS LAWS ABUSES HIS POWER FILES FAKE CHARGES AS A COP WOW GREAT SCUM HERE VISIT HIS MILLION DOLLAR SHIT BAG HOME IN SCUM ASS LOS ANGELES COUNTY CALL HIM TOO ITS AN LOS ANGELES NUMBER HE WONT CARE NEITHER WILL ANYONE ELES HE IS A DIRTY PIGGY NOT A COP COPS ARE GOOD NOBLE MEN, PROPER TEMPER, CIVIC MINDED AND ALWAYS TRUTHFUL AND UPHOLDS THE LAW, THIS DIRT BAG AINT THAT TYPE HES THE TYPE THAT IS GOING TO WORK AT WALMART SOONER THAN HE KNOWS! Watch a lying cop commit even more crimes as he 2x in one day commit 632PC which not only is against the law in California and the constituition he had no right to record me not committing a crime, just because i am not committing a crime and you are engaged in conversation that you later turn in as harassment you are silly! never once in the course of any conversation did you tell me to stop calling the phone, how am i to know its annoying if you engage with me and even call me from blocked numbers many times, one of which i tell you i am recording an record you telling me you just want to talk, how you wanna talk after filing charges illegally for 653(a) ?? (by the way you turned them in as 653 against you , its your wifes number, she just handed it to you while you were in your bedroom located in LA county where you illegally 632pc eavesdropped on me to record me not committing any 653!) They even had they asshole Officer Huntleman who left a wanted fugitive sex offender around my child after he was shown the court order. Grandma gave it to him, i was in a across the block recording him from another vehicle he witnessed and allowed a wanted fugitive of sex crimes that has a court order to be away from my minor victim son. he sent him back in the house. then this punk files 653 PC charges on me. bro you live in Los Angeles county your phone is registered to the 310 Los Angeles County Area, sorry you are out of your jurisdiction when you were filing charges against me, you still never told me to stop, you know i record you dumb fuck. so i call you accept the call enjoy it because you dont tell me to stop, you then file charges outside of the jurisdiction with your corrupt orange county station you are employed at. you are scum so is the DA. fuck of you got nothing coming STOP THE SEX OFFENDER AROUND MY SON THAT KEEPS COMING AND LIVING IN THE HOME AGAINST A JUDGES ORDER THE JUDGE MADE THE ORDER TO KEEP MY SON SAFE AND YOU DUMB FUCKS CANT ARREST A FUGITIVE FROM JUSTICE FOR SEX CRIMES ......... WHEN I HAND HIM TO YOU DUMB FUCKS SHOULD KILL YOURSELVES YOU ARE NOT LAW YOU ARE EVIL FUCKS THAT ARE LITTLE SKIN SKINNED IMMORRAL WEAK FUCKS WITH NO JUST JUSTICE IN YOU ONLY REVENGE AND ABUSE OF POWERS WHEN YOU WANKERS GET YOUR FEELINGS HURT. LIKE WEAK MEN THAT YOU ARE YOU CANT SOLVE A CRIME WHEN ITS HANDED TO YOU FUCKING SHAME YOU ALLOW DANGER AND HARM TO CHILDREN CONSIDER YOU PRIVACY GONE YOU NEVER HAD IT ILL MAKE SURE YOU ARE REMINDED THAT YOU NEVER HAD IT EVER ALL THIS GOES AWAY WHEN YOU ALL STOP RETRACT WHAT YOU HAVE DONE, LIES, FRAMING A TAX PAYING CHRISTIAN FATHER WHO WANTS HIS KID SAFE! FIX THE FAKE SHIT YOU STUCK ON ME ARREST THE PERPETRATOR SEX OFFENDER FOR PC 288 AND PC 288.2 FOR PUTTING HIS DICK PHOTOS ON MY SONS IPHONE HE IS ALSO WANTED FOR 2 OTHER SEX CRIMES IN 2 OTHER COUNTIES THEIR IS A COURT ORDER THAT DOES NOT WORK AND IT WAS SET IN PLACE TO PROTECT MY SON REMEMBER THIS SITE WILL STAY UP UNTIL YOU COMPLETE THESE TASKS YOU DO NOT INTIMIDATE ME YOU ARE WRONG AND WRONG IS WRONG MAN UP DO THE RIGHT THING YOU CAN WAKE UP EACH DAY AND CHOSE TO DO RIGHT YET YOU CHOSE WRONG SITE GOES DOWN WHEN YOU HAVE DONE YOU JOB TO PROTECT MY SON AND REMOVE SEX OFFENDER AND FIX YOU FUCKING OF ME ILLEGALLY BY MALICIOUS PROSECUTION THIS IS SITE IS A 1ST AMENDMENT RIGHT I HAVE TO DISTRIBUTE TRUTHFUL NEWS, HANDOUT FLYERS AND LEAFLETS AND ORGANIZE A PEACEFUL ASSEMBLY! Freedom of Assembly – Peaceful Assembly – 1st Amendment Right LIKE THE VIDEO MORE HERE PIGS, COPS DONT WORRY WE LIKE COPS WE DONT LIKE PIGS, THATS ANOTHER STORY! Police Gone Wild - Cops Bloopers Dirty Cops Bad Cops - BUSTED! Cops Owned LEARN HOW YOU TOO WILL LOSE YOUR CAREER PIG SHIT MAYBE THIS LYING MANIPULATIVE DBAG NEEDS TO READ HIS DEPARTMENTS CODE OF CONDUCT FOR LHPD - MISSION STATEMENT CODE OF CODUCT FOR THEIR OFFICERS FOR YOU DBAG IS HERE Cal. Code Regs. tit. 11 § 1205 Download PDF Current through Register 2025 Notice Reg. No. 2, January 10, 2025 Section 1205 - Serious Misconduct(a) Serious Misconduct is:(1) Dishonesty relating to the reporting, investigation, or prosecution of a crime, or relating to the reporting of, or investigation of misconduct by, a peace officer or custodial officer, including, but not limited to, false statements, intentionally filing false reports, tampering with, falsifying, destroying, or concealing evidence, perjury, and tampering with data recorded by a body-worn camera or other recording device for purposes of concealing misconduct. For purposes of this subsection, in considering whether a suspension or revocation of certification is proper, the Commission will consider the extent to which the dishonesty related to a material or significant fact in the context of the statement or omission alleged to be dishonest, and will also consider whether the dishonesty appears to have been done willfully or intentionally, with the intent to deceive.(2) Abuse of power, including, but not limited to, intimidating witnesses, knowingly obtaining a false confession, and knowingly making a false arrest. For purposes of this subsection, in considering whether a suspension or revocation of certification is proper, the Commission will consider the extent to which the abuse of power was a knowing abuse of the power and authority of a public office.(3) Physical abuse, including, but not limited to, the excessive or unreasonable use of force.(4) Sexual assault as described in subdivision (b) of Penal Code Section 832.7, and shall extend to acts committed amongst members of any law enforcement agency.(5) Demonstrating bias on the basis of actual or perceived race, national origin, religion, gender identity or expression, housing status, sexual orientation, mental or physical disability, or other protected status in violation of law or department policy or inconsistent with a peace officer's obligation to carry out their duties in a fair and unbiased manner. This paragraph does not limit an employee's rights under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.(A) An officer is "demonstrating" bias for purposes of this Regulation when the officer either shows or displays, by words, actions or other conduct, prejudice, intolerance, contempt, or hatred towards one or more persons due to that person's membership within a class of persons identified in Penal Code section 13510.8(b)(5), when such words, actions or other conduct would lead a reasonable person to conclude that the officer has not fairly and impartially performed, or will not fairly and impartially perform, their law enforcement duties.(B) An officer engaging in racial profiling in violation of Penal Code section 13519.4 is demonstrating bias because profiling casts suspicion on a class of people without individualized suspicion as to the person being stopped.(6) Acts that violate the law and are sufficiently egregious or repeated as to be inconsistent with a peace officer's obligation to uphold the law or respect the rights of members of the public, as determined by the Commission.(7) Participation in a law enforcement gang. For the purpose of this paragraph, a "law enforcement gang" means a group of peace officers within a law enforcement agency who may identify themselves by a name and may be associated with an identifying symbol, including, but not limited to, matching tattoos, and who engage in a pattern of on-duty behavior that intentionally violates the law or fundamental principles of professional policing, including, but not limited to, excluding, harassing, or discriminating against any individual based on a protected category under federal or state antidiscrimination laws, engaging in or promoting conduct that violates the rights of other employees or members of the public, violating agency policy, the persistent practice of unlawful detention or use of excessive force in circumstances where it is known to be unjustified, falsifying police reports, fabricating or destroying evidence, targeting persons for enforcement based solely on protected characteristics of those persons, theft, unauthorized use of alcohol or drugs on duty, unlawful or unauthorized protection of other members from disciplinary actions, and retaliation against other officers who threaten or interfere with the activities of the group.(8) Failure to cooperate with an investigation into potential police misconduct, including an investigation conducted pursuant to Chapter 1 of Title 4 of Part 4 of the Penal Code. For purposes of this paragraph, the lawful exercise of rights granted under the United States Constitution, the California Constitution, or any other law shall not be considered a failure to cooperate.(9) Failure to intercede when present and observing another officer using force that is clearly beyond that which is necessary, as determined by an objectively reasonable officer under the circumstances, taking into account the possibility that other officers may have additional information regarding the threat posed by a subject. Cal. Code Regs. Tit. 11, § 1205 Note: Authority cited: Sections 13506 and 13510.8, Penal Code. Reference: Section 13510.8, Penal Code. Note: Authority cited: Sections 13506 and 13510.8, Penal Code. Reference: Section 13510.8, Penal Code. 1. New section filed 12-30-2022; operative 1/1/2023 pursuant to Government Code section 11343.4(b)(3) (Register 2022, No. 52). 2. New subsections (a)(5)(A)-(B) filed 4-18-2024; operative 4/18/2024 pursuant to Government Code section 11343.4(b)(3) (Register 2024, No. 16). Abuse & Neglect - The Reporters (Police, D.A & Medical & the Bad Actors) If You Would Like to Learn More About: The California Mandated Reporting Law Click Here To Read the Penal Code § 11164-11166 - Child Abuse or Neglect - California Penal Code 11164-11166 Article 2.5. Child Abuse and Neglect Reporting Act (CANRA) Click Here ALL POLICE CHIEFS, POLICE , SHERIFFS andCOUNTY WELFARE DEPARTMENTS INFORMATION BULLETIN click here Officers and DA's for (Procedure to Follow) NEED THIS fill out this hard to find Mandated Reporter FORM ss_8572 CLICK HERE Suspected Child Abuse (YOU MUST MAKE A REPORT NO CHOICE)! PC 288 - Bigamy, Incest, and the Crime Against Nature - READ LAW PC 288.2 - SEXTING (Moving Digital Porn to OR from a CHILD DEVICE) - READ LAW If You Would Like to Learn More About: The California Mandated Reporting Law Click Here It Only Takes a Minute to Make a Difference in the Life of a Child You can learn more here California Child Abuse and Neglect Reporting Law its a PDF files taken from Abuse & Neglect Quick Study Guide THE PDF VERSION HERE SINCE YOU GUYS HAVE FAILED MAYBE YOU NEED TRAINING https://mandatedreporterca.com/ SINCE YOU GUYS HAVE FAILED MAYBE YOU NEED PHONE NUMBERS California Emergency Response Child Abuse Reporting Telephone Numbers JUST IN CASE YOU ARE TOO DUMB TO DO YOU DUE DILLEGENCE HERE IS HOW YOU REPORT, YOU START WITH AN EDUCATION OF WHAT IT IS https://goodshepherdmedia.net/mandated-reporter-laws/ JUST IN CASE YOU ARE TOO DUMB TO DO YOU DUE DILLEGENCE HERE IS HOW YOU REPORT... HINT, YOU HAVE TO FILE A FORM :) Reporting Form for LEAs Who Use Alternative Training For Mandatory Reporting MAYBE AS LAW MEN AND WOMEN YOU ARE INHERITNLY DONT CARE AND NOT BRUSHED UP ON LAW Penal Code 288 PC – Lewd and Lascivious Acts with a Minor Child Penal Code 288.2 PC- Sending Harmful Material to Seduce a Minor Child Abuse Reporting Guidelines capc.sccgov.org/child-abuse-reporting-guidelines Myths and Facts About Sexual Assault meganslaw.ca.gov/mobile/Education_MythsAndFacts.aspx Where to report child sexual abuse d2l.org/reporting-child-abuse-california/ NOW THIS SEX OFFENDER IS MY SONS BROTHER, NO ONE WANTS HIM IN PRISON OR JAIL... THERE IS NO HELP FOR HIS ISSUES THERE! BUT WE DO WANT HIM BOOKED, ARRESTED, CHARGED AND THEN GET HELP IN A COMFORTABLE SETTING LIKE A HOSPITAL UNTIL A PSYCHOLOGIST IS WILLING TO PUT HIS DOCTORATE ON THE LINE AND SAY "NIGEL ROBERTSON IS SEXUALLY SAFE AROUND ALL CHILDREN" UNTIL THAT HAPPENS HE SHULD NOT BE AROUND MY SON! HE HAS A COURT ORDER THAT NO ONE LISTENS TOO! HE IS ORDERED OUT OF THAT HOUSE BY JUDGE JOHN FLYNN III YET NO ONE HONORS THE SAFETY AND WELL BEING OF MY MINOR SON, NOW A VICTIM THEY NEVER RELEASE BODY CAM FOOTAGE WHICH SHOWS OFFICER HUNTLEMAN DOING THE FOLLOWING Penal Code 135 PC – Destroying or Concealing Evidence Penal Code 141 PC – Planting or Tampering with Evidence in California Penal Code 31 PC – Aiding and Abetting Laws Penal Code 142 PC – Peace Officer Refusing to Arrest or Receive Person Charged with Criminal Offense Evidence Locker Below - Access Denied Click Photo if to Access only if you know you have access, all other clicks will be considered trespassing by US Government YOU ARE WORTHLESS JEALOUS BUMBLING LYING MORONS INCAPABLE OF SURVIVAL WITHOUT A GOVERMENT JOB, TOO DUMB TO SURVIVE LIKE A CIVILLIAN YOU ARE THE REASON PEOPLE SHOULD USE CONTRACEPTIVES, THE ONLY REASON, YOU ARE NOT NEEDED, YOU LIE YOU ARE DUMB AND CORRUPTED = USELESS! TO SPARE THE INTELLEGENT FROM DEALING WITH YOUR INSANITY OF YOUR INCOMPETANCE AND BIAS YOUR PARENTS WOULD HAVE SAVED THE GOVERMENT FROM A TORT YOU ARE GUILTY OF CAUSING LYING ABUSING YOUR POWER HARMING DISOBEYING A COURT ORDER AIDING AND ABETTING A FUGITIVE CHILD ENDANGERMENT AND HARM TOP MY CIVIL RIGHTS AND CONSPIRACY TO HARM MY CIVIL RIGHTS AND YOU ARE GUILTY ARE HARMING THE REALTIONSHIP TIME WITH MY SON. YOU HAVE HARMED THE REALTIONSHIP BETWEEN Daddy & Son - EACH ONE OF YOU WILL PAY $$ AND YOUR REPUTATION AND ACTIONS WILL BE FOREVER CEMENTED IN WEB HISTORY. https://goodshepherdmedia.net/daddy-son-suffer/ Obstruction of Justice and Abuse of Process What Is Considered Obstruction of Justice in California? ARE PEOPLE LYING ON YOU? CAN YOU PROVE IT? IF YES.... THEN YOU ARE IN LUCK! Penal Code 115 PC – Filing a False Document in California Penal Code 118 PC – California Penalty of “Perjury” Law Federal Perjury – Definition by Law Penal Code 132 PC – Offering False Evidence Penal Code 134 PC – Preparing False Evidence Crimes Against Public Justice Penal Code 118.1 PC – Police Officer$ Filing False Report$ Spencer v. Peters– Police Fabrication of Evidence – 14th Amendment Lying Cop or Citizen - PC 129 – Preparing False Statement or Report Under Oath Penal Code 132 PC – Offering False Evidence Penal Code 134 PC – Preparing False Evidence Penal Code 135 PC – Destroying or Concealing Evidence Lying Cop or Citizen - PC 129 – Preparing False Statement or Report Under Oath Penal Code 141 PC – Planting or Tampering with Evidence in California Penal Code 142 PC - Peace Officer Refusing to Arrest or Receive Person Charged with Criminal Offense PC 146 Penal Code - False Arrest Penal Code 148.5 PC – Making a False Police Report in California Misuse of the Warrant System – California Penal Code § 170 Penal Code 182 PC – “Criminal Conspiracy” Laws & Penalties Penal Code § 236 PC – False Imprisonment Penal Code 664 PC – “Attempted Crimes” in California Penal Code 31 PC – Aiding and Abetting Laws Penal Code 32 PC – Accessory After the Fact What is Abuse of Process? What is a Due Process Violation? - 4th Amendment & 14th Amendment What’s the Difference between Abuse of Process, Malicious Prosecution and False Arrest? Defeating Extortion and Abuse of Process in All Their Ugly Disguises The Use and Abuse of Power by Prosecutors (Justice for All) Maybe CIU should investigate SIU, LHPD, GGPD and the Head DA Todd Spitzer as he is the superior who through pecking order oversees the subordinates under his control. DA Bradbury (subordinate noun/adjective/verb) subordination and subordinate control of my case has committed Malicious Prosecution, he is guilty too of not watching his subordinate as his elected office has duties he is clearly failing and other duties he clearly violates and does run pay to play games as well. "Personal involvement in deprivation of constitutional rights is prerequisite to award of damages, but defendant may be personally involved in constitutional deprivation by direct participation, failure to remedy wrongs after learning about it, creation of a policy or custom under which unconstitutional practices occur or gross negligence in managing subordinates who cause violation." (Gallegos v. Haggerty, N.D. of New York, 689 F. Supp. 93 (1988). This ruling make DA Todd Spitzer Negligent and a conspirator 18 U.S. Code § 241 to the violation of my (42-us-code-1983-civil-action ) civil rights and is a violation of code 18 U.S. Code § 242 Before we place the stigma of a criminal conviction upon any such citizen the legislative mandate must be clear and unambiguous. Accordingly that which Chief Justice Marshall has called 'the tenderness of the law Page 11 of 48 for the rights of individuals' [FN1] entitles each person, regardless of economic or social status, to an unequivocal warning from the legislature as to whether he is within the class of persons subject to vicarious liability. Congress cannot be deemed to have intended to punish anyone who is not 'plainly and unmistakably' within the confines of the statute. United States v. Lacher, 134 U.S. 624, 628, 10 S. Ct. 625, 626, 33 L. Ed. 1080; United States v. Gradwell, 243 U.S. 476,485, 37 S. Ct. 407, 61 L. Ed. 857. FN1 United States v. Wiltberger, 5 Wheat. 76, 95, 5 L.Ed. 37. We do not overlook those constitutional limitations which, for the protection of personal rights, must necessarily attend all investigations conducted under the authority of Congress. Neither branch of the legislative department, still less any merely administrative body, established by Congress, possesses, or can be invested with, a general power of making inquiry into the private affairs of the citizen. Kilbourn v. Thompson, 103 U. S. 168,196 [26: 377, 386]. We said in Boyd v. United States, 116 U. S. 616, 630 [29: 746, 751]—and it cannot be too often repeated—that the principles that embody the essence of constitutional liberty and security forbid all invasions on the part of the government and its employes of the sancity of a man's home, and the privacies of his life. As said by Mr. Justice Field in Re Pacific R. Commission, 32 Fed. Rep. 241,250, "of all the rights of the citizen, few are of greater importance or more essential to his peace and happiness than the right of personal security, and that involves, not merely protection of his person from assault, but exemption of his private affairs, books, and papers from the inspection and scrutiny of others. Without the enjoyment of this right, all others would lose half their value." "Ignorance of the law does not excuse misconduct in anyone, least of all in a sworn officer of the law." In re McCowan (1917), 177 C. 93, 170 P. 1100. "All are presumed to know the law." San Francisco Gas Co. v. Brickwedel (1882), 62 C. 641; Dore v. Southern Pacific Co. (1912), 163 C. 182, 124 P. 817; People v. Flanagan (1924), 65 C.A. 268, 223 P. 1014; Lincoln v. Superior Court (1928), 95 C.A. 35, 271 P. 1107; San Francisco Realty Co. v. Linnard (1929), 98 C.A. 33, 276 P. 368. "It is one of the fundamental maxims of the common law that ignorance of the law excuses no one." Daniels v. Dean (1905), 2 C.A. 421, 84 P. 332. In Galbraith v. County of Santa Clara, 307 F.3d 1119 (9th Cir. 2002.) held that a malicious criminal prosecution was a naked constitutional tort, and was actionable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 under the 4th Amendment. They just said it, basically out of thin air. FRAUD BY GOVERNMENT McNally v. U.S., 483 U.S. 350, 371-372 (1987), McNally v. U.S., 483 U.S. 350, 371-372 (1987), Quoting U.S. v. Holzer, 816 F.2d. 304, 307: “Fraud in its elementary common law sense of deceit - and this is one of the meanings that fraud bears in the statute, see United States v. Dial, 757 F.2d 163, 168 (7th Cir. 1985) - includes the deliberate concealment of material information in a setting of fiduciary obligation. A public official is a fiduciary toward the public, including, in the case of a judge, the litigants who appear before him, and if he deliberately conceals material information from them he is guilty of fraud. BURDEN OF PROOF " The law creates a presumption, where the burden is on a party to prove a material fact peculiarly within his knowledge and he fails without excuse to testify, that his testimony, if introduced, would be adverse to his interests." citing Meier v. CIR, 199 F 2d 392, 396 (8th Cir. 1952) quoting 20 Am Jur, Evidence, Sec 190, page 193 Notification of legal responsibility is "the first essential of due process of law". See also: U.S. v. Tweel, 550 F.2d.297. "Silence can only be equated with fraud where there is a legal or moral duty to speak or when an inquiry left unanswered would be intentionally misleading.” Clearfield Doctrine "Governments descend to the Level of a mere private corporation, and take on the characteristics of a mere private citizen...where private corporate commercial paper [Federal Reserve Notes] and securities [checks] is concerned. ... For purposes of suit, such corporations and individuals are regarded as entities entirely separate from government." NO IMMUNITY “Sovereign immunity does not apply where (as here) government is a lawbreaker or jurisdiction is the issue.” Arthur v. Fry, 300 F.Supp. 622 “Knowing failure to disclose material information necessary to prevent statement from being misleading, or making representation despite knowledge that it has no reasonable basis in fact, are actionable as fraud under law.” Rubinstein v. Collins, 20 F.3d 160, 1990 [a] “Party in interest may become liable for fraud by mere silent acquiescence and partaking of benefits of fraud.” Bransom v. Standard Hardware, Inc., 874 S.W.2d 919, 1994 Ex dolo malo non oritur actio. Out of fraud no action arises; fraud never gives a right of action. No court will lend its aid to a man who founds his cause of action upon an immoral or illegal act. As found in Black's Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition, page 509. “Fraud destroys the validity of everything into which it enters,” Nudd v. Burrows, 91 U.S 426. “Fraud vitiates everything” Boyce v. Grundy, 3 Pet. 210 "Fraud vitiates the most solemn contracts, documents and even judgments." U.S. v. Throckmorton, 98 US 61 U.S. v. Lee, 106 U.S. 196, 220 1 S. Ct. 240, 261, 27 L. Ed 171 (1882) "No man in this country is so high that he is above the law. No officer of the law may set that law at defiance with impunity. All the officers of the government, from the highest to the lowest, are creatures of the law and are bound to obey it. " Civil Rights Torts Thompson v. Clark 2022 - MALICIOUS PROSECUTOR & OFFICER Holding: Larry Thompson's showing that his criminal prosecution ended without a conviction satisfies the requirement to demonstrate a favorable termination of a criminal prosecution in a Fourth Amendment claim under Section 1983 for malicious prosecution; an affirmative indication of innocence is not needed. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), the U.S. Supreme Court held that federal officials can be sued personally for money damages for on-the-job conduct that violates the Constitution. Cases in which federal employees face personal liability cut across everything the government does in all three branches of government. Whether they are engaging in every-day law enforcement, protecting our borders, addressing national security, or implementing other critical government policies and functions, federal employees of every rank face the specter of personal liability. When a Citizen challenges the acts of a federal or state official as being illegal, that official cannot just simply avoid liability based upon the fact that he is a public official. In United States v. Lee, 106 U.S.196, 220, 221, 1 S.Ct. 240, 261, the United States claimed title to Arlington, Lee's estate, via a tax sale some years earlier, held to be void by the Court. In so voiding the title of the United States, the Court declared: "No man in this country is so high that he is above the law. No officer of the law may set that law at defiance with impunity. All the officers of the government, from the highest to the lowest, are creatures of the law and are bound to obey it. It is the only supreme power in our system of government, and every man who by accepting office participates in its functions is only the more strongly bound to submit to that supremacy, and to observe the limitations which it imposes upon the exercise of the authority which it gives. "Shall it be said... that the courts cannot give remedy when the citizen has been deprived of his property by force, his estate seized and converted to the use of the government without any lawful authority, without any process of law, and without any compensation, because the president has ordered it and his officers are in possession? If such be the law of this country, it $anction$ a tyranny which has no existence in the monarchies of Europe, nor in any other government which has a just claim to well-regulated liberty and the protection of personal rights." Sullivan v. County of Los Angeles - 12 Cal.3d 710 - Mon, 11-04-1974 - MALICIOUS PROSECUTOR & OFFICER Section 815.2 provides: "(a) A public entity is liable for injury proximately caused by an act or omission of an employee of the public entity within the scope of his employment if the act or omission would, apart from this section, have given rise to a cause of action against that employee or his personal representative. [8] Malicious prosecution "consists of initiating or procuring the arrest and prosecution of another under lawful process, but from malicious motives and without probable cause. ... [Italics in original.] The test is whether the defendant was actively instrumental in causing the prosecution." (4 Witkin, Summary of Cal. Law (8th ed. 1974) Torts, § 242, pp. 2522-2523.) Cases dealing with actions for malicious prosecution against private persons require that the defendant has at least sought out the police or prosecutorial authorities and falsely reported facts to them indicating that plaintiff has committed a crime. (Rupp v. Summerfield (1958) 161 Cal.App.2d 657, 663 [326 P.2d 912]; Centers v. Dollar Markets (1950) 99 Cal.App.2d 534, 544-545 [222 P.2d 136].) Similarly the suits against government employees or entities cited by the Senate Committee in commenting upon section 821.6 all involve the government employees' acts in filing charges or swearing out affidavits of criminal activity against the plaintiff. fn. 9 No case has predicated a finding of malicious prosecution on the holding of a person in jail beyond his term or beyond the completion of all criminal proceedings against him.United States v. Wiltberger cited https://goodshepherdmedia.net/sullivan-v-county-of-los-angeles/ Civil Rights Boyd v. United, 116 U.S. 616 at 635 (1885) Justice Bradley, "It may be that it is the obnoxious thing in its mildest form; but illegitimate and unconstitutional practices get their first footing in that way; namely, by silent approaches and slight deviations from legal modes of procedure. This can only be obviated by adhering to the rule that constitutional provisions for the security of persons and property should be liberally construed. A close and literal construction deprives them of half their efficacy, and leads to gradual depreciation of the right, as if it consisted more in sound than in substance. It is the duty of the Courts to be watchful for the Constitutional Rights of the Citizens, and against any stealthy encroachments thereon. Their motto should be Obsta Principiis." Downs v. Bidwell, 182 U.S. 244 (1901) "It will be an evil day for American Liberty if the theory of a government outside supreme law finds lodgement in our constitutional jurisprudence. No higher duty rests upon this Court than to exert its full authority to prevent all violations of the principles of the Constitution." Duncan v. Missouri, 152 U.S. 377, 382 (1894) "Due process of law and the equal protection of the laws are secured if the laws operate on all alike, and do not subject the individual to an arbitrary exercise of the powers of government." Giozza v. Tiernan, 148 U.S. 657, 662 (1893), Citations Omitted "Undoubtedly it (the Fourteenth Amendment) forbids any arbitrary deprivation of life, liberty or property, and secures equal protection to all under like circumstances in the enjoyment of their rights... It is enough that there is no discrimination in favor of one as against another of the same class. ...And due process of law within the meaning of the (Fifth and Fourteenth) amendment is secured if the laws operate on all alike, and do not subject the individual to an arbitrary exercise of the powers of government." Kentucky Railroad Tax Cases, 115 U.S. 321, 337 (1885) "The rule of equality... requires the same means and methods to be applied impartially to all the constitutents of each class, so that the law shall operate equally and uniformly upon all persons in similar circumstances". Butz v. Economou, 98 S. Ct. 2894 (1978); United States v. Lee, 106 U.S. at 220, 1 S. Ct. at 261 (1882) "No man [or woman] in this country is so high that he is above the law. No officer of the law may set that law at defiance with impunity. All the officers of the government from the highest to the lowest, are creatures of the law, and are bound to obey it." Olmstad v. United States, (1928) 277 U.S. 438 "Crime is contagious. If the Government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy." Mallowy v. Hogan, 378 U.S. 1 "All rights and safeguards contained in the first eight amendments to the federal Constitution are equally applicable." U.S. v. Lee, 106 U.S. 196, 220 1 S. Ct. 240, 261, 27 L. Ed 171 (1882) "No man in this country is so high that he is above the law. No officer of the law may set that law at defiance, with impunity. All the officers of the government, from the highest to the lowest, are creatures of the law are bound to obey it." "It is the only supreme power in our system of government, and every man who, by accepting office participates in its functions, is only the more strongly bound to submit to that supremacy, and to observe the limitations which it imposes on the exercise of the authority which it gives." Murdock v. Penn., 319 US 105, (1943) "No state shall convert a liberty into a privilege, license it, and attach a fee to it." Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham, 373 US 262, (1969) "If the state converts a liberty into a privilege, the citizen can engage in the right with impunity." Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, (1966) "Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation, which would abrogate them." Norton v. Shelby County, 118 U.S. 425, (1886) "An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed." Miller v. U.S., 230 F.2d. 486 ,489 "The claim and exercise of a Constitutional right cannot be converted into a crime." Brady v. U.S., 397 U.S. 742, 748,(1970) "Waivers of Constitutional Rights, not only must they be voluntary, they must be knowingly intelligent acts done with sufficient awareness." Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1, 78 S.Ct. 1401 (1958). "No state legislator or executive or judicial officer can war against the Constitution without violating his undertaking to support it. The constitutional theory is that we the people are the sovereigns, the state and federal officials only our agents." When any court violates the clean and unambiguous language of the Constitution, a fraud is perpetrated and no one is bound to obey it. (See 16 Ma. Jur. 2d 177, 178) State v. Sutton, 63 Minn. 147, 65 NW 262, 30 L.R.A. 630 Am. 459. "The 'liberty' guaranteed by the constitution must be interpreted in the light of the common law, the principles and history of which were familiar and known to the framers of the constitution. This liberty denotes the right of the individual to engage in any of the common occupations of life, to locomote, and generally enjoy those rights long recognized at common law as essential to the orderly pursuit of happiness by free men." Myer v. Nebraska, 262 U .S. 390, 399; United States v. Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649, 654. "An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed." Norton vs. Shelby County, 118 US 425 p. 442. "The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it. "No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it." 16 Am Jur 2nd, Sec 177 late 2d, Sec 256. All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void. Chief Justice Marshall, Marbury vs Madison, 5, U.S. (Cranch) 137, 174, 176 (1803). It cannot be assumed that the framers of the constitution and the people who adopted it, did not intend that which is the plain import of the language used. When the language of the constitution is positive and free of all ambiguity, all courts are not at liberty, by a resort to the refinements of legal learning, to restrict its obvious meaning to avoid the hardships of particular cases. We must accept the constitution as it reads when its language is unambiguous, for it is the mandate of the sovereign power. Cook vs Iverson, 122, N.M. 251. It is a fundamental principle in our institutions, indispensable to the preservation of public liberty, that one of the separate departments of government shall not usurp powers committed by the Constitution to another department. Mugler v. Kansas, 123 U.S. 623, 662. An unconstitutional law is not a law, it confers no rights, imposes no duties, and affords no protection. Norton vs. Shelby County, 118 US 425. “Primacy of position in our state constitution is accorded the Declaration of Rights; thus emphasizing the importance of those basic and inalienable rights of personal liberty and private property which are thereby reserved and guaranteed to the people and protected from arbitrary invasion or impairment from any governmental quarter. The Declaration of Rights constitutes a limitation upon the powers of every department of the state government. State ex rel. Davis v. Stuart. 64 A.L.R. 1307, 97 Fla. 69, 120 So. 335. "The rights of the individual are not derived from governmental agencies, either municipal, state, or federal, or even from the Constitution. They exist inherently in every man, by endowment of the Creator, and are merely reaffirmed in the Constitution, and restricted only to the extent that they have been voluntarily surrendered by the citizenship to the agencies of government. The people's rights are not derived from the government, but the government's authority comes from the people. The Constitution but states again these rights already existing, and when legislative encroachment by the nation, state, or municipality invade these original and permanent rights, it is the duty of the courts to so declare, and to afford the necessary relief. City of Dallas, et al. v. Mitchell, 245 S. W. 944, 945-46 (1922). The US Constitution is designated as a supreme enactment, a fundamental act of legislation by the people of the state. The constitution is legislation direct from the people acting in their sovereign capacity, while a statute is legislation from their representatives, subject to limitations prescribed by the superior authority. Ellingham v. Dye, 178 Ind. 336; NE 1; 231 U.S. 250; 58 L. Ed. 206; 34 S. Ct. 92; Sage v. New York, 154 NY 61; 47 NE 1096. "Owner has constitutional right to use and enjoyment of his property." Simpson v. Los Angeles (1935), 4 C.2d 60, 47 P.2d 474. "We find it intolerable that one constitutional right should have to be surrendered in order to assert another". SIMMONS v US, supra. "When rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them." Miranda vs. Arizona, 384 US 436 p. 491. "The claim and exercise of a Constitutional right cannot be converted into a crime." Miller v. U.S. 230 F 2d 486, 489. "History is clear that the first ten amendments to the Constitution were adopted to secure certain common law rights of the people, against invasion by the Federal Government." Bell v. Hood, 71 F.Supp., 813, 816 (1947) U.S.D.C. -- So. Dist. CA. you spoiled my right to a relationship with my son by perjurious statements in court and scheming to irritate, detract and divert attention from the real problem and paint me into a problem you sir will be SUED IN A CIVIL COURT when you get SUED WITH A TORT CLAIM on your department and county because you conspired to deprive me of my rights , by depriving me of 9.32 Particular Rights - Fourteenth Amendment - Interference with Parent/Child Relationship you will be held accountable I DO NOT CARE YOU ARE A COP, YOU WONT BE FOREVER YOU WILL PAY, BUT WALMART IS HIRING AFTER ALL THIS SO DONT WORRY YOU STILL HAVE A SHIT LIFE JUST AT A DIFFERENT PLACE, A PLACE THAT DOES NOT ALLOW A PERSON WITH TRUST & POWER TO CORRUPT! YOU WILL BE A POWERLESS LOW PAID WORKER WHEN AS YOU AGE, YOU ARE A LYING CORRUPT ASS PIG YOU WILL PAY MONETARILY & REPUTATION WISE you harmed me, my son, his grandparents and his brother (my other son) FRAUD$ BY GOVERNMENT McNally v. U.S., 483 U.S. 350, 371-372 (1987), McNally v. U.S., 483 U.S. 350, 371-372 (1987), Quoting U.S. v. Holzer, 816 F.2d. 304, 307: “Fraud in its elementary common law sense of deceit - and this is one of the meanings that fraud bears in the statute, see United States v. Dial, 757 F.2d 163, 168 (7th Cir. 1985) - includes the deliberate concealment of material information in a setting of fiduciary obligation. A public official is a fiduciary toward the public, including, in the case of a judge, the litigants who appear before him, and if he deliberately conceals material information from them he is guilty of fraud. BURDEN OF PROOF " The law creates a presumption, where the burden is on a party to prove a material fact peculiarly within his knowledge and he fails without excuse to testify, that his testimony, if introduced, would be adverse to his interests." citing Meier v. CIR, 199 F 2d 392, 396 (8th Cir. 1952) quoting 20 Am Jur, Evidence, Sec 190, page 193 Notification of legal responsibility is "the first essential of due process of law". See also: U.S. v. Tweel, 550 F.2d.297. "Silence can only be equated with fraud where there is a legal or moral duty to speak or when an inquiry left unanswered would be intentionally misleading.” Clearfield Doctrine "Governments descend to the Level of a mere private corporation, and take on the characteristics of a mere private citizen...where private corporate commercial paper [Federal Reserve Notes] and securities [checks] is concerned. ... For purposes of suit, such corporations and individuals are regarded as entities entirely separate from government." 42 U.S.C.A. Sec. 1983." Trezevant v. City of Tampa (1984) 741 F.2d 336, hn. 5 Mattox v. U.S., 156 US 237,243. (1895) "We are bound to interpret the Constitution in the light of the law as it existed at the time it was adopted." S. Carolina v. U.S., 199 U.S. 437, 448 (1905)."The Constitution is a written instrument. As such, its meaning does not alter. That which it meant when it was adopted, it means now." SHAPIRO vs. THOMSON, 394 U. S. 618 April 21, 1969 .Further, the Right to TRAVEL by private conveyance for private purposes upon the Common way can NOT BE INFRINGED. No license or permission is required for TRAVEL when such TRAVEL IS NOT for the purpose of [COMMERCIAL] PROFIT OR GAIN on the open highways operating under license IN COMMERCE. Juri$diction [U.S. v. Gernie, 228 F.Supp. 329 (D.C.N.Y. 1964)] Jurisdiction of court may be challenged at any stage of the proceeding, and also may be challenged after conviction and execution of judgment by way of writ of habeas corpus. Ableman v. Booth, 21 Howard 506 (1859) "No judicial process, whatever form it may assume, can have any lawful authority outside of the limits of the juri$diction of the court or judge by whom it is issued; and an attempt to enforce it beyond these boundaries is nothing less than lawless violence." "Juri$diction, once challenged, cannot be assumed and must be decided." Maine v. Thiboutot, 100 S. Ct. 250 [U.S. v. Rogers, 23 F. 658 (D.C.Ark. 1885)] In a criminal proceeding lack of subject matter jurisdiction cannot be waived and may be asserted at any time by collateral attack. WHAT TO KNOW ABOUT THE TRUTH CLICK HERE TO LEARN MORE MALICIOU$ PRO$ECUTOR$ = OCDA OFFICE THE WHOLE THING IS OFF CHILD ENDANGERMENT, FAILURE TO ACT MALICIOUS PROSECUTION AS WELL Never helping Me or My son with a bonified Child Sex Crime of PC 288 and PC 288.2 i still have the APPLE BACKUP OF THE DEVICE WHICH CLEARLY HAS ALL THE PHONE CALLS AND TEXTS BETWEEN ME AND MY SON ON HIS PRIMARY COMMUNICATION DEVICE THAT I ALSO FOUND HIS ADULT BROTHER DICK ALL OVER THAT WERE TAKEN IN PUBLIC PARKS. CAITLYN IS SO DUMB OF A CUNT SHE THOUGHT I WAS REPORTING THE CRIME OF DICK PICS IN A PARK! WOW DUMB CUNT YOU WERE TOLD THAT THEY WERE DICK PICS ON MY SON'S PHONE THE LOCATION TAKEN DOES NOT MATTER, THAT CRIME WOULD HAVE BEEN INDECENT EXPOSURE REQUIRING A VICTIM IN THE PARK TO REPORT THAT MISDEMEANOR. I WAS NOT REPORTING THAT DUMB CUNT! I WAS REPORTING THE FACT THE PHOTOS WERE FOUND ON MY SONS PHONE, HE DOES NOT NEED TO SEE THEM WITH HIS EYES FOR THE CRIME TO HAVE BEEN COMITTED. THE MERE TAKING OF MY SONS PRIMARY COMMUNITCATION DEVICE , TAKING SAID BORROWED/STOLEN PHONE AS AN ADULT TO A PARK TO PHOTO HIS COCK AND DO THIS OVER A MULTITUDE OF TIMES, DAYS, AND LOCATIONS WOULD, MEANWHILE MY SON HAS RECEIVED THE PHONE BACK MANY TIMES WHERE HE PROCEEDS TO TEXT, CALL ME AND USE THE PHOTO APP FOR HIS POWN PHOTOS WHERE I CAN SEE HIS PHOTOS IN BETWEEN ADULT DICK PHOTOS YOU FAILED TO PROTECT MY MINOR SON, THE CRIME WAS COMMITTED Never helping Me or My son with a bonified Child Sex Crime of PC 288 and PC 288.2 YOU THEN BECAME A VINDICTIVE CUNT AS ALL WORTHLESS DUMB WOMEN ALWAYS DO, THEN YOU GOT SOME LOW BALL BETA MALE TO HELP YOU PUT A CASE ON ME AND YOUR CLUCK WAS BRADBURY THE BETA BITCH MALICOUS IDIOT WHO IS CAPTAIN SAVE A BLONDE DUMB CUNT HOE! DA Caitlyn Harrington & Detective Jason Forgash & Officer Montano & a Watch commander (all recorded by me) did this to me! She is the "dumb worthless young wet behind the ear cunt" I called her, SHE IS SO DUMB she puts it in her 653(m) vindictive prosecution of me that she never answered my complaint of Gregory and his dick pics on my sons phone because their office is now vindictively prosecuting me for Montano the lying pig that not only put a temporary restraining order for Marcia (baby mama) he lied and said he served me, but he did not, i never lived with Marcia. I lived at the time in Santa Clarita. Then this Dbag Montano is one of the same officers sent to investigate DICK PICS ON MY SONS PHONE, which as him being in officer in both instances one for the mother one against the mother and no help to me is proof of bias as well. read all their reports....! Marcia ask LHPD to let her know if I call them (LHPD) to report anything at which in the report the officer in one of Marcia's complaints has a "We told her we would notify her" wow so she gets warnings calls from LHPD when I call to report her violating the court order and allowing the sex offender in the home. Huntleman can't even honor Judge's stay away orders protecting my son from a wanted sex offender. He also does not arrest sex offenders with fugitve bench warrants as he is too insubordinate and incapable of being able and apt to carry out his duty as a sworn officer of the constitution first, then federal law, the state law 424 F.2d 1021 US v. Horton R. PRUDDEN,No. 28140. . United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.April 1970 Silence can only be equated with fraud where there is a legal or moral duty to speak or where an inquiry left unanswered would be intentionally misleading. U.S. v. Tweel, 550 F. 2d. 297, 299, 300 (1977) Silence can only be equated with fraud when there is a legal and moral duty to speak or when an inquiry left unanswered would be intentionally misleading. We cannot condone this shocking conduct... If that is the case we hope our message is clear. This sort of deception will not be tolerated and if this is routine it should be corrected immediately. Morrison v. Coddington, 662 P. 2d. 155, 135 Ariz. 480(1983). Fraud and deceit may arise from silence where there is a duty to speak the truth, as well as from speaking an untruth. In regard to courts of inferior jurisdiction, “if the record does not show upon its face the facts necessary to give jurisdiction, they will be presumed not to have existed.” OFFICER HUNTLEMAN WONT BE A COP LONG. HE IS A LIAR, A FRAMER, AND A CONSTITUTINOAL RIGHTS VIOLATOR. HE IS A POOR BANKRUPT CRIMINAL NOT A COP BUT A PIG 🐖 🐷 WALMART IS ALWAYS HIRING BRYAN, YOU WILL BE ADDRESS BY A FIRST NAME NAMECARD AS WALMART EMPLOYEE, THEY HAVE RETIREMENT PLANS, ALBEIT NOT AS GOOD AS THE POLICE DEPARTMENT WHEN THE LAST TIME YOU ROAMED THE OCEAN ON YOUR BOAT WITH YOUR KID? WHEN THE LAST TIME YOU HAD YOUR KID DRIVE IN YOUR LAMBO? WHEN THE LAST TIME YOUR FLEW A HELICOPTER? AND BESIDE MONEY WHICH I TRUMP YOUR PUNK BROKE BANKRUPT ASS IN... MONEY MEANS NOTHING TO ME MONEY IS A TOOL FOR LIVING, YOU NEED IT, I DO NOT! GOD HAS BLESSED ME FOR HARD WORK AND DEDICATION AND PREACHING HIS WORD. GOD WORKS ON THOSE WHO WORK FOR HIM YOU KNONW WHY? GOD IS TAUGHT IN MY HOME FROM DAY 1 I HAVE THE RESEPCT AND LOVE OF MY SON AND NOT TO MANY FATHERS CAN SAY THAT YOU INTERUPTED AND PARTICIPATED IN DESTRUCTION OF A FAMILY UNIT AND LETTING EVIL AROUND A CHILD MY CHILD, LAWS WERE SET IN PLACE AND YOU IGNORED BOTH THE WARRANT AND JUDGES ORDER TO NOT HAVE THE SEX OFFENDER THERE! YOU ARE A FUCK WAD AND FINISHED IN LAW, GO TO WALMART SIGNUP EARLY YOU WILL NEED PLAN B NOW!@ YOU HAVE FUCKED UP TIME FOR GETTING A NEW CARRER AFTER YOU ARE HELD ACCOUNTABLE To Learn More.... Read MORE Below and click the links Below Abuse & Neglect - The Mandated Reporters (Police, D.A & Medical & the Bad Actors) Mandated Reporter Laws - Nurses, District Attorney's, and Police should listen up If You Would Like to Learn More About: The California Mandated Reporting LawClick Here To Read the Penal Code § 11164-11166 - Child Abuse or Neglect Reporting Act - California Penal Code 11164-11166Article 2.5. (CANRA) Click Here Mandated Reporter formMandated ReporterFORM SS 8572.pdf - The Child Abuse ALL POLICE CHIEFS, SHERIFFS AND COUNTY WELFARE DEPARTMENTS INFO BULLETIN: Click Here Officers and DA's for (Procedure to Follow) It Only Takes a Minute to Make a Difference in the Life of a Child learn more below You can learn more here California Child Abuse and Neglect Reporting Law its a PDF file Learn More About Police, The Government Officials and You.... $$ Retaliatory Arrests and Prosecution $$ Anti-SLAPP Law in California Freedom of Assembly – Peaceful Assembly – 1st Amendment Right Supreme Court sets higher bar for prosecuting threats under First Amendment 2023 SCOTUS We also have the Brayshaw v. City of Tallahassee – 1st Amendment - Posting Police Address We also have the Publius v. Boyer-Vine –1st Amendment - Posting Police Address We also have the Lozman v. City of Riviera Beach, Florida (2018) – 1st Amendment – Retaliatory Police Arrests We also have the Nieves v. Bartlett (2019) - 1st Amendment – Retaliatory Police Arrests We also have the Hartman v. Moore (2006) - 1st Amendment - Retaliatory Police Arrests Retaliatory Prosecution Claims Against Government Officials - 1st Amendment We also have the Reichle v. Howards (2012) - 1st Amendment - Retaliatory Police Arrests Retaliatory Prosecution Claims Against Government Officials - 1st Amendment Can You Annoy the Government? – 1st Amendment Freedom of the Press - Flyers, Newspaper, Leaflets, Peaceful Assembly - 1$t Amendment - Learn More Here Vermont's Top Court Weighs: Are KKK Fliers - 1st Amendment Protected Speech We also have the Insulting letters to politician’s home are constitutionally protected, unless they are ‘true threats’ – Letters to Politicians Homes - 1st Amendment We also have the First Amendment Encyclopedia very comprehensive – 1st Amendment Paglia & Associates Construction v. Hamilton - Public Internet Posts & Public Criticisms - Bad Reviews – 1st Amendment Learn More About True Threats Here below.... Counterman v. Colorado – Supreme Court sets higher bar for prosecuting threats under First Amendment We also have the The Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969) – 1st Amendment CURRENT TEST = We also have the The ‘Brandenburg test’ for incitement to violence – 1st Amendment We also have the The Incitement to Imminent Lawless Action Test– 1st Amendment We also have the True Threats – Virginia v. Black is most comprehensive Supreme Court definition – 1st Amendment We also have the Watts v. United States - True Threat Test – 1st Amendment We also have the Clear and Present Danger Test – 1st Amendment We also have the Gravity of the Evil Test – 1st Amendment We also have the Elonis v. United States (2015) - Threats – 1st Amendment Learn More About What is Obscene.... be careful about education it may enlighten you We also have the Miller v. California - 3 Prong Obscenity Test (Miller Test) – 1st Amendment We also have the Obscenity and Pornography – 1st Amendment Mi$Conduct - Pro$ecutorial Mi$Conduct Prosecutor$ Attorney Rule$ of Engagement - Government (A.K.A. THE PRO$UCTOR) and Public/Private Attorney What is a Fiduciary Duty; Breach of Fiduciary Duty The Attorney’s Sworn Oath Malicious Prosecution / Prosecutorial Misconduct – Know What it is! New Supreme Court Ruling – makes it easier to sue police Possible courses of action Prosecutorial Misconduct Misconduct by Judges & Prosecutor - Rules of Professional Conduct Functions and Duties of the Prosecutor - Prosecution Conduct Standards on Prosecutorial Investigations - Prosecutorial Investigations Information On Prosecutorial Discretion Why Judges, District Attorneys or Attorneys Must Sometimes Recuse Themselves Fighting Discovery Abuse in Litigation - Forensic & Investigative Accounting - Click Here Criminal Motions § 1:9 - Motion for Recusal of Prosecutor Pen. Code, § 1424 - Recusal of Prosecutor Removing Corrupt Judges, Prosecutors, Jurors and other Individuals & Fake Evidence from Your Case National District Attorneys Association puts out its standards National Prosecution Standards - NDD can be found here The Ethical Obligations of Prosecutors in Cases Involving Postconviction Claims of Innocence ABA - Functions and Duties of the Prosecutor - Prosecution Conduct Prosecutor's Duty Duty to Disclose Exculpatory Evidence Fordham Law Review PDF Chapter 14 Disclosure of Exculpatory and Impeachment Information PDF Mi$Conduct - Judicial Mi$Conduct Judge$ Prosecution Of Judges For Corrupt Practice$ Code of Conduct for United States Judge$ Disqualification of a Judge for Prejudice Judicial Immunity from Civil and Criminal Liability Recusal of Judge - CCP § 170.1 - Removal a Judge - How to Remove a Judge l292 Disqualification of Judicial Officer - C.C.P. 170.6 Form How to File a Complaint Against a Judge in California? Commission on Judicial Performance - Judge Complaint Online Form Why Judges, District Attorneys or Attorneys Must Sometimes Recuse Themselves Removing Corrupt Judges, Prosecutors, Jurors and other Individuals & Fake Evidence from Your Case DUE PROCESS READS>>>>>> Due Process vs Substantive Due Process learn more HERE Understanding Due Process - This clause caused over 200 overturns in just DNA alone Click Here Mathews v. Eldridge - Due Process - 5th, & 14th Amendment Mathews Test - 3 Part Test- Amdt5.4.5.4.2 Mathews Test “Unfriending” Evidence - 5th Amendment At the Intersection of Technology and Law We also have the Introducing TEXT & EMAIL Digital Evidence in California Courts – 1st Amendment so if you are interested in learning about Introducing Digital Evidence in California State Courts click here for SCOTUS rulings Right to Travel freely - When the Government Obstructs Your Movement - 14th Amendment & 5th Amendment What is Probable Cause? and.. How is Probable Cause Established? Misuse of the Warrant System - California Penal Code § 170 - Crimes Against Public Justice - 4th, 5th, & 14th Amendment What Is Traversing a Warrant (a Franks Motion)? Dwayne Furlow v. Jon Belmar - Police Warrant - Immunity Fail - 4th, 5th, & 14th Amendment Obstruction of Justice and Abuse of Process What Is Considered Obstruction of Justice in California? ARE PEOPLE LYING ON YOU? CAN YOU PROVE IT? IF YES.... THEN YOU ARE IN LUCK! Penal Code 115 PC – Filing a False Document in California Penal Code 118 PC – California Penalty of “Perjury” Law Federal Perjury – Definition by Law Penal Code 132 PC – Offering False Evidence Penal Code 134 PC – Preparing False Evidence Crimes Against Public Justice Penal Code 118.1 PC – Police Officer$ Filing False Report$ Spencer v. Peters– Police Fabrication of Evidence – 14th Amendment Lying Cop or Citizen - PC 129 – Preparing False Statement or Report Under Oath Penal Code 132 PC – Offering False Evidence Penal Code 134 PC – Preparing False Evidence Penal Code 135 PC – Destroying or Concealing Evidence Lying Cop or Citizen - PC 129 – Preparing False Statement or Report Under Oath Penal Code 141 PC – Planting or Tampering with Evidence in California Penal Code 142 PC - Peace Officer Refusing to Arrest or Receive Person Charged with Criminal Offense PC 146 Penal Code - False Arrest Penal Code 148.5 PC – Making a False Police Report in California Misuse of the Warrant System – California Penal Code § 170 Penal Code 182 PC – “Criminal Conspiracy” Laws & Penalties Penal Code § 236 PC – False Imprisonment Penal Code 664 PC – “Attempted Crimes” in California Penal Code 31 PC – Aiding and Abetting Laws Penal Code 32 PC – Accessory After the Fact What is Abuse of Process? What is a Due Process Violation? - 4th Amendment & 14th Amendment What’s the Difference between Abuse of Process, Malicious Prosecution and False Arrest? Defeating Extortion and Abuse of Process in All Their Ugly Disguises The Use and Abuse of Power by Prosecutors (Justice for All) Misconduct by Government Know Your Rights Click Here [embed]https://youtu.be/bbltqycR5BY?t=163[/embed] Under 42 U.S.C. $ection 1983 – Recoverable Damage$ 42 U.S. Code § 1983 – Civil Action for Deprivation of Right$ 18 U.S. Code § 242 – Deprivation of Right$ Under Color of Law 18 U.S. Code § 241 – Conspiracy against Right$ Section 1983 Lawsuit – How to Bring a Civil Rights Claim Suing for Misconduct – Know More of Your Right$ Police Misconduct in California – How to Bring a Lawsuit How to File a complaint of Police Misconduct? (Tort Claim Forms here as well) Deprivation of Rights - Under Color of the Law What is Sua Sponte and How is it Used in a California Court? Removing Corrupt Judges, Prosecutors, Jurors and other Individuals & Fake Evidence from Your Case Anti-SLAPP Law in California Freedom of Assembly – Peaceful Assembly – 1st Amendment Right How to Recover “Punitive Damages” in a California Personal Injury Case Pro Se Forms and Forms Information(Tort Claim Forms here as well) What is Tort? Tort Claims Form File Government Claim for Eligible Compensation Complete and submit the Government Claim Form, including the required $25 filing fee or Fee Waiver Request, and supporting documents, to the GCP. See Information Guides and Resources below for more information. Tort Claims - Claim for Damage, Injury, or Death (see below) Federal - Federal SF-95 Tort Claim Form Tort Claim online here or download it here or here from us California - California Tort Claims Act - California Tort Claim Form Here or here from us Complaint for Violation of Civil Rights (Non-Prisoner Complaint) and also UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT PDF Taken from the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Forms source WRITS and WRIT Types in the United States How do I submit a request for information? To submit a request send the request via mail, fax, or email to the agency. Some agencies list specific departments or people whose job it is to respond to PRA requests, so check their websites or call them for further info. Always keep a copy of your request so that you can show what you submitted and when. Templates for Sample Requests Incident Based Request: Use this template if you want records related to a particular incident, like the investigative record for a specific police shooting, an arrest where you believe an officer may have been found to have filed a false report, or to find out whether complaint that an officer committed sexual assault was sustained. ACLU Download Word document | ACLU Download PDF or from us Download Word document | or from us Download PDF Officer Based Request: Use this template if you want to find any public records of misconduct related to a particular officer or if he or she has been involved in past serious uses of force. ACLU Download Word document | ACLU Download PDF or from us Download Word document | or from us Download PDF The First Amendment Coalition also has some useful information to help explain the PRA process. Sample Letter | SB 1421 & SB 16 Records Download Word document | Download PDF Appealing/Contesting Case/Order/Judgment/Charge/ Suppressing Evidence First Things First: What Can Be Appealed and What it Takes to Get Started - Click Here Options to Appealing– Fighting A Judgment Without Filing An Appeal Settlement Or Mediation Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 1008 Motion to Reconsider Penal Code 1385 - Dismissal of the Action for Want of Prosecution or Otherwise Penal Code 1538.5 - Motion To Suppress Evidence in a California Criminal Case CACI No. 1501 – Wrongful Use of Civil Proceedings Penal Code “995 Motions” in California – Motion to Dismiss WIC § 700.1 - If Court Grants Motion to Suppress as Evidence Suppression Of Exculpatory Evidence / Presentation Of False Or Misleading Evidence - Click Here Notice of Appeal — Felony (Defendant) (CR-120) 1237, 1237.5, 1538.5(m) - Click Here California Motions in Limine – What is a Motion in Limine? Petition for a Writ of Mandate or Writ of Mandamus (learn more...) PC 1385 - Dismissal of the Action for Want of Prosecution or Otherwise Retrieving Evidence / Internal Investigation Case Pitchess Motion & the Public Inspection of Police Records Conviction Integrity Unit (“CIU”) of the Orange County District Attorney OCDA - Click Here Fighting Discovery Abuse in Litigation - Forensic & Investigative Accounting - Click Here Orange County / LA County Data, BodyCam, Police Report, Incident Reports, and all other available known requests for data below: SEARCH SB-1421 SB-16 Incidents of LA County, Oakland California Senate Bill 16 (SB 16) - 2023-2024 - Peace officers: Release of Records APPLICATION TO EXAMINE LOCAL ARREST RECORD UNDER CPC 13321 Click Here Learn About Policy 814: Discovery Requests OCDA Office - Click Here Request for Proof In-Custody Form Click Here Request for Clearance Letter Form Click Here Application to Obtain Copy of State Summary of Criminal HistoryForm Click Here Request Authorization Form Release of Case Information - Click Here Texts / Emails AS EVIDENCE: Authenticating Texts for California Courts Can I Use Text Messages in My California Divorce? Two-Steps And Voila: How To Authenticate Text Messages How Your Texts Can Be Used As Evidence? California Supreme Court Rules: Text Messages Sent on Private Government Employees Lines Subject to Open Records Requests case law: City of San Jose v. Superior Court - Releasing Private Text/Phone Records of Government Employees Public Records Practices After the San Jose Decision The Decision Briefing Merits After the San Jose Decision Rules of Admissibility - Evidence Admissibility Confrontation Clause - Sixth Amendment Exceptions To The Hearsay Rule - Confronting Evidence Prosecutor’s Obligation to Disclose Exculpatory Evidence Successful Brady/Napue Cases – Suppression of Evidence Cases Remanded or Hearing Granted Based on Brady/Napue Claims Unsuccessful But Instructive Brady/Napue Cases ABA – Functions and Duties of the Prosecutor – Prosecution Conduct Frivolous, Meritless or Malicious Prosecution - fiduciary duty Section 832.7 - Peace officer or custodial officer personnel records Senate Bill No. 1421 - California Public Records Act Assembly Bill 748 Makes Video Evidence Captured by Police Agencies Subject to Disclosure as Public Records SB 2, Creating Police Decertification Process and Expanding Civil Liability Exposure The Right To Know: How To Fulfill The Public's Right Of Access To Police Records How Access to California Police Records Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department SB-1421 Records SB1421 - Form Access to California Police Records California Statewide CPRA Requests Submit a CPRA Request Electronic Audio Recording Request of OC Court Hearings CPRA Public Records Act Data Request - Click Here Here is the Public Records Service Act Portal for all of CALIFORNIA Click Here Police BodyCam Footage Release Cleaning Up Your Record Tossing Out an Inferior Judgement - When the Judge Steps on Due Process - California Constitution Article VI - Judicial Section 13 Penal Code 851.8 PC – Certificate of Factual Innocence in California Petition to Seal and Destroy Adult Arrest Records - Download the PC 851.8 BCIA 8270 Form Here SB 393: The Consumer Arrest Record Equity Act - 851.87 - 851.92 & 1000.4 - 11105 - CARE ACT Expungement California – How to Clear Criminal Records Under Penal Code 1203.4 PC How to Vacate a Criminal Conviction in California - Penal Code 1473.7 PC Seal & Destroy a Criminal Record Cleaning Up Your Criminal Record in California (focus OC County) Governor Pardons -What Does A Governor’s Pardon Do How to Get a Sentence Commuted (Executive Clemency) in California How to Reduce a Felony to a Misdemeanor - Penal Code 17b PC Motion PARENT CASE LAW RELATIONSHIP WITH YOUR CHILDREN & YOUR CONSTITUIONAL RIGHT$ + RULING$ YOU CANNOT GET BACK TIME BUT YOU CAN HIT THOSE IMMORAL NON CIVIC MINDED PUNKS WHERE THEY WILL FEEL YOU = THEIR BANK Family Law Appeal - Learn about appealing a Family Court Decision Here 9.3 Section 1983 Claim Against Defendant as (Individuals) — 14th Amendment this CODE PROTECT$ all US CITIZEN$ Amdt5.4.5.6.2 - Parental and Children's Rights"> - 5th Amendment this CODE PROTECT$ all US CITIZEN$ 9.32 - Interference with Parent / Child Relationship - 14th Amendment this CODE PROTECT$ all US CITIZEN$ California Civil Code Section 52.1 Interference with exercise or enjoyment of individual rights Parent's Rights & Children’s Bill of Rights SCOTUS RULINGS FOR YOUR PARENT RIGHTS SEARCH of our site for all articles relating for PARENTS RIGHTS Help! Child's Best Interest in Custody Cases Are You From Out of State (California)? FL-105 GC-120(A) Declaration Under Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA) Learn More:Family Law Appeal Necessity Defense in Criminal Cases Can You Transfer Your Case to Another County or State With Family Law? - Challenges to Jurisdiction Venue in Family Law Proceedings GRANDPARENT CASE LAW Do Grandparents Have Visitation Rights? If there is an Established Relationship then Yes Third “PRESUMED PARENT” Family Code 7612(C) – Requires Established Relationship Required Cal State Bar PDF to read about Three Parent Law - The State Bar of California family law news issue4 2017 vol. 39, no. 4.pdf Distinguishing Request for Custody from Request for Visitation Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57 (2000) – Grandparents – 14th Amendment S.F. Human Servs. Agency v. Christine C. (In re Caden C.) 9.32 Particular Rights – Fourteenth Amendment – Interference with Parent / Child Relationship Child's Best Interest in Custody Cases When is a Joinder in a Family Law Case Appropriate? - Reason for Joinder Joinder In Family Law Cases - CRC Rule 5.24 GrandParents Rights To Visit Family Law Packet OC Resource Center Family Law Packet SB Resource Center Motion to vacate an adverse judgment Mandatory Joinder vs Permissive Joinder – Compulsory vs Dismissive Joinder When is a Joinder in a Family Law Case Appropriate? Kyle O. v. Donald R. (2000) 85 Cal.App.4th 848 Punsly v. Ho (2001) 87 Cal.App.4th 1099 Zauseta v. Zauseta (2002) 102 Cal.App.4th 1242 S.F. Human Servs. Agency v. Christine C. (In re Caden C.) Ian J. v. Peter M Family Treatment Court Best Practice Standards Download Here this Recommended Citation Sanctions and Attorney Fee Recovery for Bad Actors FAM § 3027.1 - Attorney's Fees and Sanctions For False Child Abuse Allegations - Family Code 3027.1 - Click Here FAM § 271 - Awarding Attorney Fees- Family Code 271 Family Court Sanction Click Here Awarding Discovery Based Sanctions in Family Law Cases - Click Here FAM § 2030 – Bringing Fairness & Fee Recovery – Click Here Zamos v. Stroud - District Attorney Liable for Bad Faith Action - Click Here Malicious Use of Vexatious Litigant - Vexatious Litigant Order Reversed Epic Criminal / Civil Right$ SCOTUS Help - Click Here Epic Parents SCOTUS Ruling - Parental Right$ Help - Click Here Judge's & Prosecutor's Jurisdiction- SCOTUS RULINGS on Prosecutional Misconduct - SCOTUS Rulings re: Prosecutors Please take time to learn new UPCOMING The PROPOSED Parental Rights Amendment to the US CONSTITUTION Click Here to visit their site The proposed Parental Rights Amendment will specifically add parental rights in the text of the U.S. Constitution, protecting these rights for both current and future generations. The Parental Rights Amendment is currently in the U.S. Senate, and is being introduced in the U.S. House. [embed]https://youtu.be/yZKvmEN3FB8[/embed] [video width="640" height="360" mp4="https://goodshepherdmedia.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Kid-Rock-We-The-People-ft-Tucker-Carlson-Made-with-Clipchamp.mp4" loop="true" preload="auto"][/video] [video width="285" height="700" mp4="https://goodshepherdmedia.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/GABRIEL-IGLESIAS-on-Police-cops-with-PRIUSES-😂-shorts.mp4" loop="true"][/video]