<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Content Neutral Archives - Good Shepherd News - Fastest Growing Religious, Free Speech &amp; Political Content</title>
	<atom:link href="https://goodshepherdmedia.net/tag/content-neutral/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://goodshepherdmedia.net/tag/content-neutral/</link>
	<description>Christian, Political, ‎‏‏‎Social &#38; Legal Free Speech News &#124; Ⓒ2024 Good News Media LLC &#124; Shepherd for the Herd! God 1st Programming</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2022 12:20:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.1</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Content Neutral &#8211; 1st Amendment</title>
		<link>https://goodshepherdmedia.net/content-neutral-1st-amendment/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Truth News]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 May 2022 12:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self Help]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court - SCOTUS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1st amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Content Neutral]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://goodshepherdmedia.net/?p=5601</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Content Neutral &#8211; 1st Amendment Content neutral refers to laws that apply to all expression without regard to the substance or message of the expression. Such laws generally regulate only the time, place, and manner of speech in contrast to content-based laws, which regulate speech based on content. This distinction is important in First Amendment cases because courts hold content-based [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1 style="text-align: center;">Content Neutral &#8211; 1st Amendment</h1>
<p>Content neutral refers to laws that apply to all expression without regard to the substance or message of the expression.</p>
<p>Such laws generally regulate only the <a href="http://mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/1023/time-place-and-manner-restrictions">time, place, and manner</a> of speech in contrast to <a href="http://mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/935/content-based">content-based</a> laws, which regulate speech based on content. This distinction is important in First Amendment cases because courts hold content-based laws to <a href="https://mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/1966/strict-scrutiny" target="_blank" rel="noopener">strict scrutiny</a> — the highest form of judicial review — while holding content-neutral laws only to intermediate, or mid-level, scrutiny.</p>
<h2>Content neutral laws are often found to be constitutional</h2>
<p>Often, the distinction is determines the outcome of a case, as many content-based laws are struck down, but many content-neutral laws survive judicial inquiry.</p>
<p>Reviewing courts often label a law as <a href="https://mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/935/content-based" target="_blank" rel="noopener">content based</a> or content neutral by determining whether the government passed the law in order to suppress expression.</p>
<p>The Supreme Court explained in <a href="http://mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/370/ward-v-rock-against-racism">Ward v. Rock Against Racism </a>(1989) that “the principal inquiry in determining content neutrality, in speech cases generally . . . is whether the government has adopted a regulation of speech because of disagreement with the message it conveys.”</p>
<p>Content-neutral laws must regulate speech without reference to the speech’s substance, be <a href="http://mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/1001/narrowly-tailored-laws">narrowly tailored</a>, and leave open alternative avenues of expression.</p>
<h2>Examples of content-neutral laws that have been upheld</h2>
<p>Examples deemed content neutral by the Supreme Court include:</p>
<ul>
<li>a National Park Service regulation prohibiting camping (including as a form of protest) in certain federal parks, determined in <a href="http://mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/727/clark-v-community-for-creative-non-violence">Clark v. Community for Creative Non-Violence </a>(1984);</li>
<li>a city park permitting scheme requiring advance application for gatherings of more than 50 individuals, in <a href="http://mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/680/thomas-v-chicago-park-district">Thomas v. Chicago Park District </a>(2002); and</li>
<li>a Minnesota rule prohibiting the sale or distribution of any merchandise, including printed material, in parks, in <a href="http://mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/620/heffron-v-international-society-for-krishna-consciousness">Heffron v. International Society for Krishna Consciousness </a>(1981).</li>
</ul>
<p>By <a href="https://mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/937/content-neutral" target="_blank" rel="noopener">David L. Hudson Jr.</a> cited <a href="https://mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/937/content-neutral" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/937/content-neutral</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
