the Law Offices of Paul Toepel Attorney –

The Dirty Truth

A story based on actions, set forth our right to our opinion

Paul Toepel Jr. opinion and review of the Paul Toepel the man behind AttorneyPaul.com

Paul Toepel is a liar.  He will lie and lie and lie as it suits him.  Paul Toepel is lazy and does not do his work carefully.  Paul Toepel will accuse people of things they never have done.  Paul Toepel has an unfamiliarity with being completely honest or even honesty at all.  Paul Toepel will lie. Paul Toepel will lack truth in the tribunal. Paul Toepel will help his client lie and mislead the courts until it gets out of control due to shit mr. Paul Toepel starts.

Paul Toepel – AttorneyPaul.com visit him if you want a great attorney lol

In my opinion Paul Toepel has no conscience! He definitely manipulates the truth!

Gun to his sons head is one of his greatest lines (click here to read his own words via transcript and here him say another opposite verbally 2 faced lying snake)! another is that Mr. Zullo and his Mother were arrested at one of his cleints work… Kaiser Los Angeles… these lies he speaks are in trnascripts! all under penalty of perjury liar! lying (click here) as a laywer is a crime, Penal  Code 118PC Perjury and California Penal Code 126 states that perjury is punishable by imprisonment for two, three, or four years under subdivision (h) of Section 1170 making it a criminal offense when he is finally prosecuted one day for this felony

yet check out the photo proof Click here to see all the proof of Toepel’s Doing

Paul Toepel has no conscience! He definitely manipulates the truth!

The Streisand Effect: Why Hiding Information Backfires

Paul Toepel if he gets himself in a bind will manipulate until he cannot manipulate anymore and when he gets in a bind too deep to handle it… he will bail on you as a client, as he did with Marcia.  He will recuse himself and leave you holding not only a smaller money bag but forced to deal with what he allowed you to get yourself into. An Attorney has a duty to the client and also to not aid perjury or commit perjury himslef!. Paul Toepel will leave you at the climax of  your case leaving you forced to find a new lawyer.  Paul Toepel knew he was making the case worse a proceeded without care or caution for his career or his clients well being legally or his clients childs feelings morally and logically.

He knew he was sent via email the video links of his client repeatedly letting HER ADULT SON, a wanted fugitive sex offender, ordered by the courts to move out and stay away from my son, who was 8. yet repeadely over a year let him come over daily. It wasnt even hard to catch, every time a PI was hired, there was new video of mother breaking the judges order which is contempt. Paul helped his client evade the penalties of this contempt which set of a chain of events he couldnt handle!

in my honest opinion Paul Toepel will not be a good lawyer for you if you plan on winning with merit!

“the Dirty Truth” is our opinion we base our opinion on court transcripts, police records, police reports and his spoke words and behaiors.

Paul Toepel might drop you or be forced to recuse himself. You may win at first but if you win by lying and manipulation its not a permanent win, its a temporary win that has consequences that can harm your parental rights. Paul Toepel will leaving you will the possibility of law suits and criminal charges for what he allowed you to do to  you because he forget his role as a sworn officer of the court

When we report that Paul Toepel will LIE… this is based on his prior and current behavior towards the tribunal, Garden Grove PD and opposing client.  When you lie the world should know. win with merit or have your ass handed to you with merit of truth

Paul Toepel is not a morally sound individual in our opinion based on his actoins and lies,
he has mislead authority, judges and openly lied!

Thanks for pissing of a SIGMA with an IQ of 168 you arrogant liar! Enjoy the truthful account of you,PAUL!

Healthy Eating Habits – How They Affect Our Kids

Learn more about the nefarious actions and consequences of Paul Toepel Criminal Lawyer (LIAR)

Learn more about personalities you do not understand

The Sigma Male Explained: Understanding the Lone Wolf

What Sigma Men Hate – The Ultimate Guide to Sigma Males

Alpha vs Sigma: The Dominant Sigma Male’

and learn more about Paul D. Toepel here

Evidence Locker Below – Access Denied

Click Photo if to Access only if you know you have access, all other clicks will be considered trespassing by US Government

all references, thoughts, words and ideas are opinions not facts.  but the lies from Pauls mouth thtat is fact! thanks for taking the time to get to the bottom of the page “the Dirty Truth” is our opinion we base our opinion on court transcripts, police records, police reports and his spoke words and behaiors.

Paul Toepel Criminal Lawyer (LIAR)

Paul Toepel Attorney

PEACEFUL PUBLIC ASSEMBLY IS REAL AND LET THE MAN PAUL KNOW THAT SEX OFFENDERS SHOULD NOT BE NEXT TO CHILDREN AND USING HIS LAW DEGREE TO LIE IN COURT AND HELP A WANTED FUGITIVE SEX OFFENDER AROUND A PROTECTIVE ORDER PROTECTING THE MINOR VICTIM IS OK TO LET HIM KNOW PEACEFULLY our rights to be vocal WE DO THIS THROUGH PEACEFUL ASSEMBLY AND LETTING HIM KNOW, MAYBE HE WAS NEVER TOLD AND THAT IS OK, WE ALL DO NOT GET GREAT PARENTS

To FIND OUT WHERE THE PEACEFUL PROTEST WILL TAKE PLACE CLICK HERE

https://sexualdeviantsoforangecounty.com/gregory-nigel-robertson-nudity-indecent-exposure/

To FIND OUT WHERE THE PEACEFUL PROTEST WILL TAKE PLACE CLICK HERE

 Jude 1:11

(11) Woe to them! For they have gone in the way of Cain, have run greedily in the error of Balaam for profit, and perished in the rebellion of Korah.The video above is about genius’, the video is not about Paul Toepel, it has nothing to do with him just an entertaining video of genius’

WANT TO SEE ALL OF PAUL’S VIOLATIONS IN THAT IN OUR OPINION HE HAS COMITTED IS HERE 

Paul Toepel Criminal Lawyer (LIAR) IS OUR OPINION

This man has no relationship with the truth and that is provable by callus blatant lies to Garden Grove Police, Judges and Courts

HAVE YOU HAD TO DEAL WITH SCUM? READ THIS Quotes for Those Strong and of Good Nature 

Honest Opinion Paul Toepel is Criminal Lying Attorney – 

Soon to be Sued and should and must be Disbarred fight aint over cheating liar!

he abuses elerly people with lawsuits they are not responsible for he is a chump lil bitch a reject

HIS OWN WORDS & DOINGS AT GARDEN GROVE POLICE STATION POINT THIS WAY

How to Sue and Take Care of A Malicious Lawyer – Use His Actions, Use His Words AGAINST HIM

“He put a gun to his sons head, I think!“ once said the lying Paul Toepel

These are only some of the lying words out of this mans mouth that he has said about me

He comfortably defames a mans fatherhood in open court with straight up lies! Tells lies about me while also lying about the whereabouts of a wanted fugitive sex offender in my sons mothers house (against a Judges orders)! He has told the judge himself Nigel is never is with Michael and has moved out!
yet check out the photo proof Click here to see all the proof of what Toepel helped keep around children The toepel doings

In my opinion Paul Toepel has no conscience! He definitely manipulates the truth!

Gun to his sons head is one of his greatest lines (click here to read his own words via transcript and here him say another opposite verbally 2 faced lying snake)! another is that Mr. Zullo and his Mother were arrested at one of his cleints work… Kaiser Los Angeles… these lies he speaks are in trnascripts! all under penalty of perjury liar! lying (click here) as a laywer is a crime, Penal  Code 118PC Perjury and California Penal Code 126 states that perjury is punishable by imprisonment for two, three, or four years under subdivision (h) of Section 1170 making it a criminal offense when he is finally prosecuted one day for this felony

yet check out the photo proof Click here to see all the proof of Toepel’s Doing

Paul Toepel has no conscience! He definitely manipulates the truth!

 Check out a Child Friendly read about LYING

WINNERS ARE TOO BUSY WINNING TO NOTICE YOU! Check out  creative way to deal with morons ! Creative writing !

https://goodshepherdreading.com

The Streisand Effect: Why Hiding Information Backfires

hey big fellow play the video below so you can figure life out lawyer boy!

Anti-SLAPP Law in California

are you all slow or just easily conned by this lying defamatory man Mr. Paul Toepel Jr.
HINT! the rabbit hole will not conceal the lies he has told, it reveals them!

DEFFEND YOUR PERJURY TO THE BAR ASSHOLE

NEXT WILL BE A TORT CLAIM TO  YOU AND YOUR LAW FIRM THE WHACKED LAW OFFICES OF PAULD TOEPEL JR.  PUNK BOY

Zullo has been known to recruit the assistance of his mother. On or around June 22, 2022,

Zullo’s mother, Theresa Zullo, was arrested for trespassing at a Kaiser mental health facility

in downtown Los Angeles. At the time of her arrest, Theresa was caught trying to access the

building with the intention of passing out hundreds of flyers she had in her possession.

The flyers contained derogatory content against and Zullo’s ex-wife, who at the time, worked at

that Kaiser facility. did not have a police report number to reference at the time of this interview.

This never happened like dozens of his claims and false statements and here is a copy of my mother’s criminal record for the last 12 years! So, what is it that he is doing in a police station giving false statement in paperwork (perjury) that will lead to a court proceeding, this is rule 8.4misconduct He literally filed charges that I robbed his bank account for $7500 as well in the same report! He should be arrested in court today for all he has caused to my freedoms!

A SIMPLE ARREST SEARCH ON THAT TIME FRAM FOR BOTH PERSONS WOULD HAVE SOLVED THAT LIE, DUMB LOW IQ POLICE WITH NO DETECTIVE SKILLS, NO FORETHOUGHT, JUST EATING UP PAULY’S LIES, and writing them down, NICE PERJURY PAUL!

I BELIEVE HE HAS COMMITTED SOME SERIOUS CRIMES BELOW BUT WE ARE NOT LAWYERS SO YOU CAN DECIDE IF LYING TO POLICE SAYING A CLIENT OF YOURS HAD A SPECIFIC MAN COME TO HIS CLIENTS WORK (A HOSPITAL) WITH SPECIFIC MANS MOTHER AND GOT ARRESTED TRYING TO GET INTO THE FACILTIY ! THIS FALSE SCENARIO THAT IS EASILY RESEARCHED WITH ANY ARREST SEARCH, HE USED THS TO FRAME A MAN AS A STALKER TO ONE OF HIS CLIENTS THEN USED THIS SCENARIO TO SAY THIS SPECIFIC MAN IS NOT STALKING HIM USING A FALSE PATTER OF AN EVENT THAT NEVER HAPPENED WHICH LED TO SPECIFIC MAN RECEIVNG A FALSE CHARGE OF STALKING ON SPECIFIC MAN DUE TO PAUL TOEPELS PURJURY! Penal Code 118 PC – California Penalty of “Perjury” Law, Penal Code 115 PC – Filing a False Document in California, Penal Code 132 PC – Offering False Evidence, Penal Code 134 PC – Preparing False Evidence, Lying Cop or Citizen – PC 129 – Preparing False Statement or Report Under Oath, Penal Code 141 PC – Planting or Tampering with Evidence in California , Penal Code 148.5 PC –  Making a False Police Report in California, WHICH THEN LED TO PC 146 Penal Code – False Arrest Misuse of the Warrant System – California Penal Code § 170 , Penal Code 182 PC – “Criminal Conspiracy” Laws & Penalties , Penal Code § 236 PC – False Imprisonment

WE at Good Shepherd BELIEVE HE HAS COMMITTED SOME SERIOUS CRIMES BELOW BUT WE ARE NOT LAWYERS SO YOU CAN DECIDE IF LYING TO POLICE SAYING A CLIENT OF YOURS HAD A SPECIFIC MAN COME TO HIS CLIENTS WORK (A HOSPITAL) WITH SPECIFIC MANS MOTHER AND GOT ARRESTED TRYING TO GET INTO THE FACILTIY ! THIS FALSE SCENARIO THAT IS EASILY RESEARCHED WITH ANY ARREST SEARCH, HE USED THS TO FRAME A MAN AS A STALKER TO ONE OF HIS CLIENTS THEN USED THIS SCENARIO TO SAY THIS SPECIFIC MAN IS NOT STALKING HIM USING A FALSE PATTER OF AN EVENT THAT NEVER HAPPENED WHICH LED TO SPECIFIC MAN RECEIVNG A FALSE CHARGE OF STALKING ON SPECIFIC MAN DUE TO PAUL TOEPELS PURJURY! Penal Code 118 PC – California Penalty of “Perjury” Law, Penal Code 115 PC – Filing a False Document in California, Penal Code 132 PC – Offering False Evidence, Penal Code 134 PC – Preparing False Evidence, Lying Cop or Citizen – PC 129 – Preparing False Statement or Report Under Oath, Penal Code 141 PC – Planting or Tampering with Evidence in California , Penal Code 148.5 PC –  Making a False Police Report in California, WHICH THEN LED TO PC 146 Penal Code – False Arrest , Penal Code 182 PC – “Criminal Conspiracy” Laws & Penalties , Penal Code § 236 PC – False Imprisonment

still comunicating with a person represented by an attorney 2/3/2025 this occured to an elderly 77 year old lady  victim of 1 stroke and 2 aneurysms

still comunicating with a person represented by an attorney 2/3/2025 this occured to an elderly 84 year old man victim of 2 strokes

CLICK CLOWN VIDEO ABOVE TO HEAR WHAT HE REALLY WAS UP TO!

NOW WATCH THIS SCUM BAG DELLUSIONALLY OR INTENIONALLY LYING ABUOT HIS INTENT OF THE CALL ABOVE!

still being unfair to oppoing party below!

Will You Matter to me? Never! Will I matter to you? Everyday it seems!

Who has free rent inside your little weasel mind ? That you voluntarily give up due to lacking of control of you and your mind, your greed, your selfishness Paul it seems so sad to see you abuse elderly for things they made and you you still have no house from what i see! and with the traffic EPGR gets you all eat top ramen maybe not sure but their aint much moving on the net!

aside from perjury,

WE BELIEVE HE HAS COMMITTED SOME SERIOUS CRIMES BELOW BUT WE ARE NOT LAWYERS SO YOU CAN DECIDE IF LYING TO POLICE SAYING A CLIENT OF YOURS HAD A SPECIFIC MAN COME TO HIS CLIENTS WORK (A HOSPITAL) WITH SPECIFIC MANS MOTHER AND GOT ARRESTED TRYING TO GET INTO THE FACILTIY ! THIS FALSE SCENARIO THAT IS EASILY RESEARCHED WITH ANY ARREST SEARCH, HE USED THS TO FRAME A MAN AS A STALKER TO ONE OF HIS CLIENTS THEN USED THIS SCENARIO TO SAY THIS SPECIFIC MAN IS NOT STALKING HIM USING A FALSE PATTER OF AN EVENT THAT NEVER HAPPENED WHICH LED TO SPECIFIC MAN RECEIVNG A FALSE CHARGE OF STALKING ON SPECIFIC MAN DUE TO PAUL TOEPELS PURJURY! Penal Code 118 PC – California Penalty of “Perjury” Law, Penal Code 115 PC – Filing a False Document in California, Penal Code 132 PC – Offering False Evidence, Penal Code 134 PC – Preparing False Evidence, Lying Cop or Citizen – PC 129 – Preparing False Statement or Report Under Oath, Penal Code 141 PC – Planting or Tampering with Evidence in California , Penal Code 148.5 PC –  Making a False Police Report in California, WHICH THEN LED TO PC 146 Penal Code – False Arrest Misuse of the Warrant System – California Penal Code § 170 , Penal Code 182 PC – “Criminal Conspiracy” Laws & Penalties , Penal Code § 236 PC – False Imprisonment

click here to read the council minutes

Paul Toepel NO fireworks FUN FOR ANYONE is his request ban fireworks! its our opinion he thinks that adults are not comptetant and can NOT handle fun FIREWORKS safely

Non compos mentis “having control/mastery of one’s mind.”  – meaning nothing can harm or influence ones mind that is sound and strong – if a man has a real mans personality one should re-read this line and call themself a man only after………. Non compos mentis “having control/mastery of one’s mind.”

Marriage of Willis v. Costa-Willis

IN RE: the Marriage of RICKY ALLAN WILLIS (2023)

That portion of the DVRO modifying the judgment’s joint legal and physical custody provisions to award Shauna sole legal and physical custody is reversed

The method used in my opinion by Paul D. Toepel is to SECURE DVRO against FATHER, then STRIP FATHER of visitation and rights to fatherhood.

A man named Philip is another one of his victims of this exact behavior.

in our opinion its a pattern

learn MORE:

These laws are permissible under the First Amendment if drafted in a way that meets the high bar set by the Supreme Court in a series of cases, starting with New York Times Co. v. Sullivan. 

Learn what the Supreme Court View and Decision reagarding threats is True Threats – Virginia v. Black is most comprehensive Supreme Court definition – 1st Amendment and their decision to create a TRUE THREAT TEST Watts v. United States – True Threat Test – 1st Amendment

also hating an individual is not illegal Supreme Court unanimously reaffirms: There is “NO HATE SPEECH’ exception to the First Amendment

and literature that has words that may bother you, the lines of threats are drawn here Counterman v. Colorado – Supreme Court sets higher bar for prosecuting threats under First Amendment

Paglia & Associates Construction v. Hamilton – Public Internet Posts & Public Criticisms – Bad Reviews

The Consumer Review Fairness Act – What It Is & Why It Matters

Publius v. Boyer-Vine – 1st Amendment- Posting Police or citizens private real Address

 Salinas v. Cruz; The 2nd Court of Appeals of California Reverses Restraining Order Because Cross-Examination Was Barred

Right to Record Government Officials Engaged in the Exercise of their Official Duties

​

Those were Bar and Business Code Violations
(with Penal attachments for code violation)

Rule 3.1 Meritorious Claims and Contentions

Rule 1.1 Competence 

Rule 5-100 Threatening Criminal, Administrative, or Disciplinary Charges Caitly had her CHUMP PUNK PIG ABUSE BRUCE BLANK (BRAIN DEAD MORON)

Rule 3.3 Candor Toward the Tribunal
(1) Make a false statement of fact or law to a tribunal or fail to correct a false statement of material fact or law previously made to the tribunal by the lawyer;
(2) Fail to disclose to the tribunal legal authority in the controlling jurisdiction known to the lawyer to be directly adverse to the position of the client and not disclosed by opposing counsel; or
(3) Offer evidence that the lawyer knows to be false. If a lawyer, the lawyer’s client or a witness called by the lawyer has offered material evidence and the lawyer comes to know of its falsity, the lawyer shall take reasonable remedial measures, including, if necessary, disclosure to the tribunal. A lawyer may refuse to offer evidence, other than the testimony of a defendant in a criminal matter that the lawyer reasonably believes is false.

Rule 4.1 Truthfulness in Statements to Others I HAVE ATTACHED ALL HIS LIES
Truthfulness in Statements to Others also covers the duty of candor. He actually tells statements he knows to be false which is not allowed even when protecting confidentiality

Rules 1.2.1 [Advising or Assisting the Violation of Law) HE HELPED NIGEL STAY IN HOME

Rule 8.4 Misconduct

• To bring an action, conduct a defense, assert a position in litigation, or take an appeal, without probable cause and for the purpose of harassing or maliciously injuring any person; or
• To present a claim or defense in litigation that is not warranted under existing law, unless it can be supported by a good faith argument for an extension, modification, or reversal of such existing law.
  Id. at Rule 3-200; see also Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 6068.Subsection (c) provides that an attorney must counsel only just actions or defenses except if the client is charged with a public offense. Subsection (d) embodies the duty of candor and provides that may only do such things that are consistent with the truth. A violation of these rules could subject the attorney to suspension or disbarment. Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 6103.
• California Rule of Professional Conduct 5-200, Trial Conduct, states that in presenting a matter to a tribunal, a member:
  • • • Shall employ, for the purpose of maintaining the causes confided to the member, such means only as are consistent with truth; told the court Nigel has moved out even though I had emailed him surveillance and I presented to the court evidence contrary to his statements he denied my claims and mislead the court and bold face lied to them
      • Shall not seek to mislead the judge, judicial officer or jury by an artifice or false statement of fact or law; told through suggestion to the judge by not returning my son who fears moms home that I am kidnapping my son, even though I have police incident reports I show up to each exchange and the child refuses to go even after speaking with the sheriff and he said I put a gun to my sons head
      • Shall not intentionally misquote to a tribunal the language of a book, statute or decision; he did this by telling the court flat out lies on several instances including misleading by misquoting the tribunal decision previously  the CONTENTS OF THE JUDGES ORDER TO PROTECT MY SON. Mr. Toepel also told the courts this with vexatious litigant told the court I fit the criteria which is lying and misleading the Tribunal. Mr. Toepel had the court make an erroneous decision and declare me a Vexatious litigant. I NEVER FIT ANY CRITERIA! Code of Civil Procedure section 391(b) clearly states – Vexatious litigant requires in a 7-year period maintained in propria persona at least 5 litigations other than small claims court that has been finally determined adversely to the person. I have exactly 0 cases that fall into this classification. I have testimony from Mr. Toepel via transcripts of numerous attempts to mislead the judge to declare me a vexatious litigant
      • he used this order to criminally cause issues for me and still completely lock me out of communication and the ability to fight for my rights to fatherhood he helps take from me by grossly misleading to the court on every occasion he attended
      • Shall not, knowing its invalidity, cite as authority a decision that has been overruled or a statute that has been repealed or declared unconstitutional; and he tried to seek a restraining order against flyer distribution which is my 1^st amendment rights to send out regarding information that is factual news about members of the community (judge denied him)
        He attempts to get restraining orders one for himself and one for his client he received both under a complete lie and false pretenses. He misleads the court about the physical danger he and his client were in. Never once did I threaten their physical safety however I did exercise my 1^st amendment rights, my freedom of speech allows me to complain on Google Reveiws, Yelp, and any supervisory person incharge of either their license of them if they are in commission of a violation of their sworn duties. I cannot be prevent or punished from complaining unless they are fake or false.  He also told the court that he will communicate with me, as I am PRO PER, for legal matters only if the judge issues the restraining order, he issued it and I tried communicating over 50 times via email and voice message to no avail. He lied to the issuing judge and used this order to criminally cause issues for me and still completely lock me out of communication and the ability to fight for my rights to fatherhood he helps take from me by grossly misleading to the court on every occasion he attended
        Rule 5-200 provides that an attorney will present in front of the court using only those means that are consistent with the truth and shall not act to mislead the judge, judicial officer or jury through a false statement of the law or fact, nor shall the attorney intentionally misquote a source or knowingly cite invalid authority.
        Cal. Rule of Prof. Conduct 5-200 provides that “[i]n presenting a matter to a tribunal, a member: (b) shall not seek to mislead the judge, judicial officer, or jury by an artifice or false statement of fact or law.” See also Mendez v. Superior Court, 162 Cal. App.4th 827 (2009) (observing that “‘“ [c]ounsel should not forget that they are officers of the court, and while it is their duty to protect and defend the interests of their clients, the obligation is equally imperative to aid the court in avoiding error and in determining the cause in accordance with justice and the established rules of practice.”’”)
        Id. at Rule 5-200. For a discussion of the duty of candor, and its application in questions about witnesses, client perjury, and citing authority, see Wendy Patrick Mazzarella, Lawyer’s Duty of Candor: Zealous representation can lead attorneys down a slippery slope right up to the ethical edge, CALIFORNIA BAR JOURNAL (April 2007), available at https://archive.calbar.ca.gov/archive/Archive.aspx?articleId=84844&categoryId=84645&month=4&year=2007If you are reading this in print and the link is too hard I have shortened it with a link shortening service by TINYURL in which will redirect you too the actual CALBAR link above  https://tinyurl.com/truthcalbarCal. Rules Prof. Conduct, 5-200.
        People v. Davis, 48 Cal.2d 241, 257 (1957); In re Branch, 70 Cal.2d 200, 210-211 (1969); Cal. Penal Code § 127. “Every person who willfully procures another person to commit perjury is guilty of subornation of perjury. . . .” and may be punished as if he had perjured himself, which includes a prison term of two, three or four years. Cal. Penal Code §§ 126-27. 475 U.S. 157 (where defendant, in presenting claim of self-defense shortly before trial that he’d seen something metallic in the victim’s hand and told his attorney that “[i]f I don’t say I saw a gun, I’m dead”, the defendant did not render ineffective assistance of counsel when he told his client he would tell the court and withdraw as his attorney if the client so perjured himself; the client did not present the perjured testimony as was convicted).
        Nix, supra 475 U.S. at 169-70.
        People v. Johnson, 62 Cal.App.4th 608 (1998) (finding it error when attorney told court he had an “ethical conflict” calling him as a witness and the court prevented the defendant from testifying).
        Cal. Rules Prof. Conduct 3-310(B)(4) provides that an attorney can’t accept or continue representation of a client without providing written disclosure when has or has had legal, business, financial or professional interest in the subject matter of the representation.
        ABA Model Rules 4.1(a) (2008).
        ABA Model Rules 4.1 cmt. 2 (2008).
        Cal. Evid. Code § 1126. 17 ABA Model Rules 3.3(a)(2) (2008).

• 26 U.S. Code § 7206 – Fraud and false statements learn at Cornell Lawhere
• perjury when Paul Toepel attorney of law perjured himself in court  Perjury – California Penal Code 118 PC describes perjury as knowingly providing false testimony while under oath, which is a felony offense punishable by up to four years in jail.
• CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT LAW
  State Bar Court decision, In the Matter of Maloney and Virsik:
  “[The attorneys] committed acts of moral turpitude in wilful violation of section 6106 by knowingly making repeated misrepresentations to the Superior Court. It is well established that acts of moral turpitude include an attorney’s false or misleading statements to a court or tribunal…The actual intent to deceive is not necessary…Acts of moral turpitude include concealment as well as affirmative misrepresentations…
  [N]o distinction can be drawn among concealment, half-truth, and false statement of fact…Also, it is not necessary that [the attorneys] actually succeeded in perpetrating a fraud on the court…These [court] pleadings were permeated with half-truths, omissions, and outright misstatements of fact and law. The Supreme Court has denounced such misleading conduct and has not hesitated to impose discipline in such cases.”
  Lawyers have always had a duty to be honest and truthful pursuant to general ethical principles, as well as the State Bar Act. The newest version of the Rules of Professional Conduct, effective November 1, 2018, provides more specific guidance to lawyers relative to this duty. Rules 1.2.1, 1.6, 3.4, 4.1, 4.2, 4.3,7.1 through 7.5, and 8.4 are all implicated in this duty, as well as Business & Professions Code (“B&P”) sections 6068(d), 6106, and 6128, among others. This discussion will focus on the B&P Code sections, violations of which constitute cause for disbarment or other State Bar sanction, including but not limited to suspension, fines, and re-taking the Professional Responsibility examination.
  Lawyers are required to be truthful not only in dealing with the court and parties in litigation, but also in transactional matters and document preparation. Violations by a lawyer of these requirements can result in not only liability in tort — to one’s own client as well as opposing parties and counsel — but also in State Bar discipline.
  The B&P Code is the source that allows the State Bar to prosecute lawyers for violations of ethical requirements, and section 6068 contains a long list of an attorney’s duties: “It is the duty of an attorney to do all of the following: …

(d) to employ, for the purpose of meeting the causes confided to him or her those means only as are consistent with truth, and never to seek to mislead the judgeor any judicial officer by an artifice or false statement of fact or law. (Emphasis added.)
Opposing lawyers, as “officers of the court”, are duty-bound to not only tell the truth, but not to omit information that would cause the court or opposing counsel to be misled. This applies not only to litigated matters, but to “all causes confided to him or her”. See Shafer v. Berger, Kahn, et al. (2003) 107 Cal.App.4^th 54 for a lengthy discussion of attorney misrepresentations which were determined to be fraudulent, including statements made by counsel during settlement negotiations. These are opinions based on reading the bar ruless

WE BELIEVE HE HAS COMMITTED SOME SERIOUS CRIMES BELOW BUT WE ARE NOT LAWYERS SO YOU CAN DECIDE IF LYING TO POLICE SAYING A CLIENT OF YOURS HAD A SPECIFIC MAN COME TO HIS CLIENTS WORK (A HOSPITAL) WITH SPECIFIC MANS MOTHER AND GOT ARRESTED TRYING TO GET INTO THE FACILTIY ! THIS FALSE SCENARIO THAT IS EASILY RESEARCHED WITH ANY ARREST SEARCH, HE USED THS TO FRAME A MAN AS A STALKER TO ONE OF HIS CLIENTS THEN USED THIS SCENARIO TO SAY THIS SPECIFIC MAN IS NOT STALKING HIM USING A FALSE PATTER OF AN EVENT THAT NEVER HAPPENED WHICH LED TO SPECIFIC MAN RECEIVNG A FALSE CHARGE OF STALKING ON SPECIFIC MAN DUE TO PAUL TOEPELS PURJURY! Penal Code 118 PC – California Penalty of “Perjury” Law, Penal Code 115 PC – Filing a False Document in California, Penal Code 132 PC – Offering False Evidence, Penal Code 134 PC – Preparing False Evidence, Lying Cop or Citizen – PC 129 – Preparing False Statement or Report Under Oath, Penal Code 141 PC – Planting or Tampering with Evidence in California , Penal Code 148.5 PC –  Making a False Police Report in California, WHICH THEN LED TO PC 146 Penal Code – False Arrest Misuse of the Warrant System – California Penal Code § 170 , Penal Code 182 PC – “Criminal Conspiracy” Laws & Penalties , Penal Code § 236 PC – False Imprisonment

Quick Links

Anti-SLAPP Law in California

Freedom of Assembly – Peaceful Assembly – 1st Amendment Right

Counterman v. Colorado – Supreme Court sets higher bar for prosecuting threats under First Amendment

We also have the The Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969) – 1st Amendment

CURRENT TEST = We also have the The ‘Brandenburg test’ for incitement to violence – 1st Amendment

We also have the The Incitement to Imminent Lawless Action Test– 1st Amendment

We also have the True Threats – Virginia v. Black is most comprehensive Supreme Court definition – 1st Amendment

We also have the Watts v. United States – True Threat Test – 1st Amendment

We also have the Clear and Present Danger Test – 1st Amendment

We also have the Gravity of the Evil Test – 1st Amendment

We also have the Elonis v. United States (2015) – Threats – 1st Amendment

Learn More About What is Obscene…. be careful about education it may enlighten you

We also have the Miller v. California – 3 Prong Obscenity Test (Miller Test) – 1st Amendment

We also have the Obscenity and Pornography – 1st Amendment

Penal Code 115 PC – Filing a False Document in California

Penal Code 118 PC – California Penalty of “Perjury” Law

Federal Perjury – Definition by Law

Penal Code 132 PC – Offering False Evidence

Penal Code 134 PC – Preparing False Evidence

Crimes Against Public Justice

Penal Code 118.1 PC – Police Officer$ Filing False Report$

Spencer v. Peters– Police Fabrication of Evidence – 14th Amendment

Lying Cop or Citizen – PC 129 – Preparing False Statement or Report Under Oath

Penal Code 135 PC – Destroying or Concealing Evidence

Lying Cop or Citizen – PC 129 – Preparing False Statement or Report Under Oath

Penal Code 141 PC – Planting or Tampering with Evidence in California

Penal Code 142 PC – Peace Officer Refusing to Arrest or Receive Person Charged with Criminal Offense

PC 146 Penal Code – False Arrest

Penal Code 148.5 PC –  Making a False Police Report in California

Misuse of the Warrant System – California Penal Code § 170

Penal Code 182 PC – “Criminal Conspiracy” Laws & Penalties

Penal Code § 236 PC – False Imprisonment

Penal Code 664 PC – “Attempted Crimes” in California

Penal Code 31 PC – Aiding and Abetting Laws

Penal Code 32 PC – Accessory After the Fact

What is Abuse of Process? 

What is a Due Process Violation? – 4th Amendment & 14th Amendment

What’s the Difference between Abuse of Process, Malicious Prosecution and False Arrest?

discipline is a state of mind that starts with core values not a closed mouth!

a disciplined man mind and body is strong and fit

they control cravings wether drugs or food or sex or gambling

vices are for no man

YOU SUCK DUE TO THE FOOD YOU FEED YOUR MIND AND THE KARMA THAT FOLLOWS LYING MANIPULATORS.. a NON-FAMOUS man said! THAT MY OPINION

FOOD FOR THOUGHT

REMEMBER THIS OPINION SHOULD BE READ TO ALLOW YOU TO THINK