Tue. May 21st, 2024
A Section 1983 lawsuit is a civil rights lawsuit that can be filed by someone whose civil rights have been violated.A Section 1983 lawsuit is a civil rights lawsuit that can be filed by someone whose civil rights have been violated.

118.1 PC – Police Officers Filing False Reports

Can Police Lye on Affidavits  – Short Answer, NO! THAT IS A VIOLATION OF PC 118.1

Not if they Value their Career & Freedom and Don’t want civil responsibility

Police have no expectation of privacy on phone calls.  Police lines are recorded expectations end there!

Under Penal Code 118.1 PC, it is a crime for peace officers to make a knowingly false statement in a crime report, even if it is not a “sworn statement” made under oath. A violation is a wobbler that prosecutors can charge as either a misdemeanor or a felony.

Normally, a false assertion is only a criminal act if it is made under a declaration of perjury. This section makes it a crime even if the officer did not certify it as true or sign the report under penalty of perjury.

The language of the statute reads that:

118.1. (a) Every peace officer who, in their capacity as a peace officer, knowingly and intentionally makes, or causes to be made, any material statement in a peace officer report, or to another peace officer and the statement is included in a peace officer report, regarding the commission or investigation of any crime, knowing the statement to be false, is guilty of filing a false report, punishable by imprisonment in the county jail for up to one year, or in the state prison for one, two, or three years.

(b) This section does not apply to a peace officer writing or making a peace officer report, with regard to a false statement that the peace officer included in the report that is attributed to any other person, unless the peace officer writing or making the report knows the statement to be false and is including the statement to present the statement as being true.


  • an officer stating that a suspect had cocaine in his pocket (when he really had no drugs).
  • a law enforcement officer reporting that the accused resisted arrest (when he really did not).
  • a police officer stating that he saw the suspect with a gun in his hand (when he really found it in some nearby bushes).


An officer can fight a false reporting charge with a legal defense. A few common defenses are:

  • mistake,
  • falsity relates to an immaterial matter, and/or
  • false information by a third party.


As a misdemeanor, the crime is punishable by:

As a felony, the offense is punishable by:

Our California criminal defense attorneys will discuss the following in this article:

Police jotting down notes. A false statement on the crime report can lead to 118.1 PC charges.

It is a crime for a police officer to file a false report on a criminal matter.

1. When is filing a false report a crime?

Penal Code 118.1 PC is the California statute that makes it a crime for a police officer to file a false report on a criminal matter.1

A prosecutor must prove the following to prove a case under this code section:

  1. the defendant is a police officer and while acting in his official capacity,
  2. wrote a report in a criminal matter,
  3. the report included false information about a material matter, and
  4. the officer acted knowingly when he entered the false information in the report.2

Note that if the above are proven true, an officer is guilty even if he did not sign the report under penalty of perjury.

Questions often arise under this statute on the meaning of:

  • official capacity,
  • criminal matter,
  • material matter, and
  • knowingly.

1.1 Official capacity

This law only applies to those reports an officer files when he is acting as a police officer. It does not apply to any reports that he makes in his personal capacity.

In addition, it only applies to those reports he makes to the agency that employs him.

Example: Nicole is an officer with the LAPD. She writes two reports. One in her personal capacity on the recent rise in crime that she presents to her son’s grade school class. The other is on a criminal matter for the FBI.

Here, Nicole is unlikely guilty of a crime if she includes false information in either report. The first report is written in her personal capacity. The second is written for the FBI and not the LAPD.

1.2. Criminal matter

This code section only applies to criminal matters. Many times, police officers write reports in connection with purely civil or administrative matters, such as:

  • traffic accidents,
  • fires, or
  • earthquakes.

If an officer is not reporting on a crime specifically, this section does not apply.

1.3. Material matter

For a guilty charge under PC 118.1, the false statement must be “material.” This means it must relate to something of significance or importance. This is opposed to a matter that is trivial or incidental in nature.3

Example: San Francisco police officer Jones is eating lunch at a diner. He gets a report of a shooting. He races to the crime scene and does not see the suspect. He later files a report. In it, he says he was eating in his car when he learned of the crime.

Here, Jones is not guilty of a crime. While it is false that he was eating in his car, this is of a trivial matter. He would be guilty, though, if he reports that he saw the suspect when he arrived at the crime scene. This is false information of a material matter.

1.4. Knowingly

An officer is only guilty under this law if he knowingly enters false information.

According to California criminal law, a person acts knowingly if he understands that facts exist which bring his actions within the provisions of this code section.4

Police often write their reports hours or even days after witnessing or investigating a crime. Memory does fade and falter. Honest mistakes in reporting are not criminal.5

Example: Nia is a San Diego police officer. She gets called to the scene of an assault case. The victim has a bloody nose. Nia files a report later that day and does not remember where the victim was bleeding. She states in her report that she believed the victim had blood over one eye.

Here, Nia is not guilty of a crime. While she was wrong in reporting on the location of the blood, this falsity was due to a mistake in recollection. She did not knowingly falsify the information.

2. Cops Lying 118.1 PC

2.1. Mistake

An officer is only guilty under this law if he knowingly includes false information in a report. This means it is a defense for an accused to show that:

  • while he may have entered false information in a police report,
  • he did so mistakenly and not on purpose.

2.2. Falsity relates to an immaterial matter

There can only be a PC 118.1 guilty charge if an officer falsified information on a material matter. This is opposed to information that is deemed trivial in nature. Therefore, it is a defense for a defendant to show that the false information was not on anything material to the case.

2.3. False information by third party

A police officer is not guilty of a crime if:

  • he files a report of a crime, and
  • includes in it false information given by a witness or other third party.

An officer is only guilty for his own false information.

Example: Marcos is an officer and responds to the scene of a battery. A witness lies and tells Marcos that he saw the suspect hit the victim “with his own eyes.” Marcos includes this information in his report of the case.

Here, Marcos is not guilty under PC 118.1. While his report includes false information, Marcos did not falsify anything. He just recorded a lie that was made by a witness.

3. What are the penalties?

A violation of this code section is a wobbler offense. This means the district attorney can charge it as either a misdemeanor or a felony.

As a misdemeanor, the crime is punishable by:

  • custody in the county jail for up to one year, or
  • misdemeanor (or summary) probation.6

As a felony, the offense is punishable by:

  • imprisonment in state prison for up to three years, or
  • felony (or formal) probation.7

4. Can an officer get a conviction expunged?

An officer convicted of this crime is entitled to an expungement if he:

  1. successfully completes probation, or
  2. completes a jail term (whichever is relevant).

If a party violates a probation term, he could still possibly get the offense expunged. But this would be in the judge’s discretion.

Under Penal Code 1203.4, an expungement releases an individual from virtually “all penalties and disabilities” arising out of the conviction.8

5. Does a conviction affect an officer’s gun rights?

A conviction under this statute may have a negative effect on a defendant officer’s gun rights.

According to California law, convicted felons are prohibited from acquiring or possessing a gun in California.

This means that:

  • if an officer violates the law and the prosecutor charges him with a felony, and
  • the accused is convicted of the same,

the defendant will lose his rights to own and possess a gun.

6. What can a person do if the victim of a false police report?

There are several things a person can do if he is the victim of a false police report. These include:

  1. cross-examine the officer – a criminal defense attorney would do this during a California jury trial. The lawyer would hopefully be able to make the officer provide information that is inconsistent with his report.
  2. file a complaint – a person can file a police misconduct complaint with the officer’s department. If the person was charged with a crime because of the report, a complaint may result in the reduction or dismissal of charges.
  3. run a Pitchess motion – a Pitchess motion is a request by the defense to access an officer’s personnel record. This access is sought to see if other people have complained about the officer committing similar misconduct.
  4. Sue the police  – there’s always the possibility of filing a lawsuit against the police officer, his department and the city. This is usually only a viable option if a person can prove that the officer lied and that the false statement caused him to be wrongly arrested, convicted and/or jailed. Many of these lawsuits get brought under United States Code 1983.

7. Are there related offenses?

There are three laws related to Penal Code 118.1. These are:

  1. perjury – PC 118,
  2. malicious prosecution, and
  3. false report of a crime – PC 148.5.

7.1. Perjury – PC 118

Perjury is a crime in California per Penal Code 118 PC. California law defines “perjury” as deliberately giving false information while under oath.

Note that this crime can be committed by:

  1. police officers, and
  2. non-officers alike.

7.2. Malicious prosecution

Malicious prosecution is a civil lawsuit filed by a person that is the victim of another’s:

  • meritless, and
  • harmful claim.

To succeed in the suit, the plaintiff must prove:

  • the defendant made a frivolous claim against the plaintiff,
  • the lawsuit was filed not to win, but rather for some other purpose, and
  • the plaintiff suffered damages as a result of the frivolous claim.

Unlike malicious prosecution, a charge under PC 118.1 is criminal in nature and filed by the state.

7.3. False report of a crime – PC 148.5

Penal Code 148.5 PC is the California law against making a false report of a crime. Specifically, this section applies when a person makes a false report of a crime to a:

  • police officer,
  • prosecutor,
  • grand jury, or
  • state or local employee assigned to accept reports from citizens (such as a 911 operator).

Note that while PC 118.1 applies to police officers, PC 148.5 applies to only non-officers.

For additional guidance or to discuss your case with a criminal defense attorney, we invite you to contact us at Shouse Law Group. We serve clients throughout the state, including Los Angeles, Orange County, Santa Monica, Santa Clarita, Burbank, Palmdale, and more.

Legal References:

  1. California Penal Code 118.1 PC.
  2. See same.
  3. For a discussion of materiality in the context of perjury law, see People v. Feinberg, (1997) 51 Cal.App.4th 1566.
  4. California Penal Code 7.
  5. See California Jury Instruction – Criminal 7.24.
  6. California Penal Code 118.1 PC.
  7. See same.
  8. California Penal Code section 1203.4 PC.


cited https://www.shouselaw.com/ca/defense/penal-code/118-1/



To Learn More…. Read MORE Below and click the links

Learn More About True Threats Here below….

We also have the The Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969)1st Amendment

CURRENT TEST = We also have the TheBrandenburg testfor incitement to violence 1st Amendment

We also have the The Incitement to Imminent Lawless Action Test 1st Amendment

We also have the True Threats – Virginia v. Black is most comprehensive Supreme Court definition – 1st Amendment

We also have the Watts v. United StatesTrue Threat Test – 1st Amendment

We also have theClear and Present Danger Test – 1st Amendment

We also have theGravity of the Evil Test – 1st Amendment

We also have the Elonis v. United States (2015) – Threats – 1st Amendment

Learn More About What is Obscene….

We also have the Miller v. California 3 Prong Obscenity Test (Miller Test) – 1st Amendment

We also have the Obscenity and Pornography – 1st Amendment

Learn More About Police, The Government Officials and You….

We also have theBrayshaw v. City of Tallahassee1st Amendment Posting Police Address

We also have thePublius v. Boyer-Vine –1st Amendment Posting Police Address

We also have the Lozman v. City of Riviera Beach, Florida (2018) – 1st Amendment – Retaliatory Police Arrests

We also have the Nieves v. Bartlett (2019)1st Amendment – Retaliatory Police Arrests

We also have the Freedom of the Press – Flyers, Newspaper, Leaflets, Peaceful Assembly – 1st Amendment

We also have the Insulting letters to politician’s home are constitutionally protected, unless they are ‘true threats’ – 1st Amendment

We also have the Introducing TEXT & EMAILDigital Evidencein California Courts  1st Amendment

We also have the First Amendment Encyclopedia very comprehensive 1st Amendment


We also have the Penal Code 118 PC – California Penalty of “Perjury” Law

We also have theFederal Perjury – Definition by Law

We also have the Penal Code 132 PCOffering False Evidence

We also have the Penal Code 134 PCPreparing False Evidence

We also have thePenal Code 118.1 PCPolice Officers Filing False Reports

We also have the Spencer v. PetersPolice Fabrication of Evidence – 14th Amendment

We also have the Penal Code 148.5 PC –  Making a False Police Report in California

We also have the Penal Code 115 PC – Filing a False Document in California

Know Your Rights Click Here (must read!)

 Under 42 U.S.C. $ection 1983 – Recoverable Damage$

42 U.S. Code § 1983Civil Action for Deprivation of Right$

$ection 1983 LawsuitHow to Bring a Civil Rights Claim

18 U.S. Code § 242Deprivation of Right$ Under Color of Law

18 U.S. Code § 241Conspiracy against Right$

$uing for MisconductKnow More of Your Right$

Police Misconduct in CaliforniaHow to Bring a Lawsuit

New Supreme Court Ruling – makes it easier to sue police



We also have the 9.3 Section 1983 Claim Against Defendant as (Individuals) — 14th Amendment thisCODE PROTECTS all US CITIZENS

We also have the  Amdt5. – Parental and Children’s Rights 5th Amendment thisCODE PROTECTS all US CITIZENS

We also have the 9.32 Interference with Parent / Child Relationship – 14th Amendment thisCODE PROTECTS all US CITIZENS

We also have the California Civil Code Section 52.1Interference with exercise or enjoyment of individual rights

We also have the Parent’s Rights & Children’s Bill of RightsSCOTUS RULINGS FOR YOUR PARENT RIGHTS

We also have a SEARCH of our site for all articles relatingfor PARENTS RIGHTS Help!

Contesting / Appeal an Order / Judgment / Charge

Options to Appealing– Fighting A Judgment Without Filing An Appeal Settlement Or Mediation 

Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 1008 Motion to Reconsider

Penal Code 1385Dismissal of the Action for Want of Prosecution or Otherwise

Penal Code 1538.5Motion To Suppress Evidence in a California Criminal Case

CACI No. 1501 – Wrongful Use of Civil Proceedings

Penal Code “995 Motions” in California –  Motion to Dismiss

WIC § 700.1If Court Grants Motion to Suppress as Evidence

 Epic Criminal / Civil Rights SCOTUS Help Click Here

At issue in Rosenfeld v. New Jersey (1972) was whether a conviction under state law prohibiting profane language in a public place violated a man's First Amendment's protection of free speech. The Supreme Court vacated the man's conviction and remanded the case for reconsideration in light of its recent rulings about fighting words. The man had used profane language at a public school board meeting. (Illustration via Pixabay, public domain) Epic Parents SCOTUS Ruling Parental Rights Help Click Here