📰Christian Free Speech, 📰Political, 📰Social & 📰Legal News | 📰Ⓒ2023 Good News Media LLC | Shepherd for the Herd! God 1st Programming - Displaying & Displacing The OC Deviants
The wrongful conviction of an innocent person should be every prosecutor’s greatest concern (FUCKING LAUGHABLE AT BEST OC DA IS A HARD NOSED ASHOLE MORON VINDICTIVE 2 FACED PAY TO PLAY CRIMINAL HIMSELF, SO YEAH I CALL BULLSHIT CIU).
A prosecutor’s highest priority should be ensuring innocent people are never prosecuted.
The Conviction Integrity Unit (“CIU”) of the OCDA investigates claims of factual innocence presented by defendants who were convicted in the County of Orange, California.
A defendant or attorney seeking to have a conviction reviewed should complete the Conviction Integrity Intake Form and submit it to the OCDA
ABOUT THE C.I.U.
(THIS C.I.U. IT$ ALL A $HOW, THEY PUT THI$ UNIT HERE TO MAKE THE CITIZEN FEEL LIKE THEY CHECK UP ON $TUFF!
IT$ OBVIOU $ A$ ACTION$ SPEAK LOUDER THAN WORD$, WHICH PROVE$ C.I.U. ARE USELE$$ AND DO NOTHING…. PROVE ME WRONG!)
The wrongful conviction of an innocent person should be every prosecutor’s greatest concern. A prosecutor’s highest priority should be ensuring innocent people are never prosecuted.
The Conviction Integrity Unit (“CIU”) of the OCDA investigates claims of factual innocence presented by defendants who were convicted in the County of Orange, California.
A defendant or attorney seeking to have a conviction reviewed should complete the Conviction Integrity Intake Form and submit it to the OCDA.
The global stipulation (Administrative Order 20/24) is applicable to the Public Defender, but it is also available to other defense counsel and pro per defendants that choose to abide by its terms. As the Administrative Order states, “The process described in the Stipulation is equally available to other defense counsel upon agreement to be bound by the terms of the applicable protective order as set forth by the stipulation.”
If private counsel or pro per defendants wish to abide by the stipulation, they can receive the relevant discovery directly from the DA’s Office without the need for a Pitchess motion or other court order.
Simply complete and submit the Evidence Audit Stipulation (“Agreement Regarding Disclosure of Evidence Audit Records, Remedy Record Printouts and Associated Reports”).
Conviction Integrity Unit (“CIU”) of the Orange County District Attorney OCDA
Bureau of Investigation
OCDA OFFICE BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
The Orange County District Attorney’s Office – Bureau of Investigation supports the prosecutorial and law enforcement endeavors of the District Attorney. It provides a wide range of policing services tasked with suppressing crime and ensuring all criminal cases filed in Orange County are thoroughly investigated.
The Bureau of Investigation (Bureau) is the Orange County District Attorney’s Office (OCDA) law enforcement division. The Bureau is comprised of more than 130 sworn police Investigators who are seasoned law enforcement professionals recruited from other law enforcement agencies. District Attorney Investigators have extensive investigative experience, highly developed technical skills, exemplary work records, and an outstanding personal history. The Bureau also employs 90 non-sworn support team members.
Investigators assist prosecutors in trial by developing leads and locating additional witnesses, uncooperative or reluctant witnesses, ensuring the safety of victims and witnesses, and engaging in trial strategy with their prosecutor partners.
Their work is extensive, includes writing and serving search and arrest warrants, investigating original cases in complex matters, and going the extra mile to ensure the law is enforced in a just, honest, efficient, and ethical manner.
The Bureau’s “Special Assignments” unit responds to and investigates officer-involved shootings, custodial deaths, police officer criminal misconduct allegations, public corruption, and other sensitive or complex investigations. In addition, OCDA Investigators are assigned and participate on 10 different local, state, and federal task forces. These task forces allow law enforcement to leverage the abilities and expertise of the various participating agencies, which results in coordinated and effective investigations of the highest level crimes.
OCDA Investigator TRUE Expertise as opposed to what they claim in their bullshit spiel above
(expertise at not protecting you the citizen who pays taxes and their salary as a public servant)
(expertise at not protecting your constitutional rights as the citizen who pays taxes and their salary as a public servant)
(expertise at not protecting you the citizen from their own! They have no problem allowing malicious prosecutors to work with malicous police and collude, coordinate, and conspire against your rights, they say FUCK YOUR RIGHTS AND FUCK THE LAW WHEN IT COMES TO THEIR OWN, they want your to EAT SHIT YOU!….. who pays taxes and their salary as a public servant)
(expertise at not helping you secure evidence out of your own cases they hold the evidence to, to prove your point of their illegal activity, they instead TRY TO frame you add cases that clearly violated the constitution in hopes of slinging so much shit your way you cannot afford and think your way out, but IQ 168 this aint a problem for me the citizen who pays taxes and their salary as a public servant)
(expertise at making frivolous malicious cases piled thick as a way to control your rights as a citizen that they do not like your exercising as the citizen who pays taxes and their salary as a public servant)
YOU ARE WORTHLESS JEALOUS BUMBLING LYING MORONS INCAPABLE OF SURVIVAL WITHOUT A GOVERMENT JOB, TOO DUMB TO SURVIVE LIKE A CIVILLIAN
YOU ARE THE REASON PEOPLE SHOULD USE CONTRACEPTIVES,THE ONLY REASON, YOU ARE NOT NEEDED, YOU LIE YOU ARE DUMB AND CORRUPTED = USELESS! TO SPARE THE INTELLEGENT FROM DEALING WITH YOUR INSANITY OF YOUR INCOMPETANCE AND BIAS
YOUR PARENTS WOULD HAVE SAVED THE GOVERMENT FROM A TORT
YOU ARE GUILTY OF CAUSING LYING ABUSING YOUR POWER HARMING DISOBEYING A COURT ORDER AIDING AND ABETTING A FUGITIVE CHILD ENDANGERMENT AND HARM TOP MY CIVIL RIGHTS AND CONSPIRACY TO HARM MY CIVIL RIGHTS
AND YOU ARE GUILTY ARE HARMING THE REALTIONSHIP TIME WITH MY SON. YOU HAVE HARMED THE REALTIONSHIP BETWEEN Daddy & Son – EACH ONE OF YOU WILL PAY $$ AND YOUR REPUTATION AND ACTIONS WILL BE FOREVER CEMENTED IN WEB HISTORY.
Maybe CIU should investigate SIU, LHPD, GGPD and the Head DA Todd Spitzer as he is the superior who through pecking order oversees the subordinates under his control. DA Bradbury (subordinate noun/adjective/verb) subordination and subordinate control of my case has committed Malicious Prosecution, he is guilty too of not watching his subordinate as his elected office has duties he is clearly failing and other duties he clearly violates and does run pay to play games as well.
“Personal involvement in deprivation of constitutional rights is prerequisite to award of damages, but defendant may be personally involved in constitutional deprivation by direct participation, failure to remedy wrongs after learning about it, creation of a policy or custom under which unconstitutional practices occur or gross negligence in managing subordinates who cause violation.”(Gallegos v. Haggerty, N.D. of New York, 689 F. Supp. 93 (1988). This ruling make DA Todd Spitzer Negligent and a conspirator18 U.S. Code § 241 to the violation of my (42-us-code-1983-civil-action ) civil rights and is a violation of code 18 U.S. Code § 242
Before we place the stigma of a criminal conviction upon any such citizen the legislative mandate must be clear and unambiguous. Accordingly that which Chief Justice Marshall has called ‘the tenderness of the law Page 11 of 48 for the rights of individuals’ [FN1] entitles each person, regardless of economic or social status, to an unequivocal warning from the legislature as to whether he is within the class of persons subject to vicarious liability.Congress cannot be deemed to have intended to punish anyone who is not ‘plainly and unmistakably’ within the confines of the statute. United States v. Lacher, 134 U.S. 624, 628, 10 S. Ct. 625, 626, 33 L. Ed. 1080; United States v. Gradwell, 243 U.S. 476,485, 37 S. Ct. 407, 61 L. Ed. 857. FN1 United States v. Wiltberger, 5 Wheat. 76, 95, 5 L.Ed. 37.
We do not overlook those constitutional limitations which, for the protection of personal rights, must necessarily attend all investigations conducted under the authority of Congress. Neither branch of the legislative department, still less any merely administrative body, established by Congress, possesses, or can be invested with, a general power of making inquiry into the private affairs of the citizen. Kilbourn v. Thompson, 103 U. S. 168,196 [26: 377, 386]. We said in Boyd v. United States, 116 U. S. 616, 630 [29: 746, 751]—and it cannot be too often repeated—that the principles that embody the essence of constitutional liberty and security forbid all invasions on the part of the government and its employes of the sancity of a man’s home, and the privacies of his life.
As said by Mr. Justice Field in Re Pacific R. Commission, 32 Fed. Rep. 241,250, “of all the rights of the citizen, few are of greater importance or more essential to his peace and happiness than the right of personal security, and that involves, not merely protection of his person from assault, but exemption of his private affairs, books, and papers from the inspection and scrutiny of others. Without the enjoyment of this right, all others would lose half their value.”
“Ignorance of the law does not excuse misconduct in anyone, least of all in a sworn officer of the law.” In re McCowan(1917), 177 C. 93, 170 P. 1100.
“All are presumed to know the law.” San Francisco Gas Co. v. Brickwedel (1882), 62 C. 641; Dore v. Southern Pacific Co. (1912), 163 C. 182, 124 P. 817; People v. Flanagan (1924), 65 C.A. 268, 223 P. 1014; Lincoln v. Superior Court (1928), 95 C.A. 35, 271 P. 1107; San Francisco Realty Co. v. Linnard (1929), 98 C.A. 33, 276 P. 368.
“It is one of the fundamental maxims of the common law that ignorance of the law excuses no one.” Daniels v. Dean (1905), 2 C.A. 421, 84 P. 332.
We also have the Hartman v. Moore (2006) – 1st Amendment – Retaliatory Police Arrests
Retaliatory Prosecution ClaimsAgainstGovernment Officials – 1st Amendment
We also have the Reichle v. Howards (2012) – 1st Amendment – Retaliatory Police Arrests
Retaliatory Prosecution ClaimsAgainstGovernment Officials – 1st Amendment
We also have the Freedom of the Press – Flyers, Newspaper, Leaflets, Peaceful Assembly – 1st Amendment
We also have the Insulting letters to politician’s home are constitutionally protected, unless they are ‘true threats’ – Letters to Politicians Homes – 1st Amendment
We also have theFirst Amendment Encyclopedia very comprehensive – 1st Amendment
ARE PEOPLE LYING ON YOU? CAN YOU PROVE IT? IF YES…. THEN YOU ARE IN LUCK!
We also have thePenal Code 118 PC – California Penalty of “Perjury” Law
The proposed Parental Rights Amendment will specifically add parental rights in the text of the U.S. Constitution, protecting these rights for both current and future generations.
The Parental Rights Amendment is currently in the U.S. Senate, and is being introduced in the U.S. House.
