California Penal Code § 236 PC defines the crime of “false imprisonment” as unlawfully restraining, detaining, or confining a person against his or her will. The offense can be charged as either a misdemeanor or felony and is punishable by up to three years in jail.

Examples

• grabbing a spouse by her shoulders during an argument and preventing her from leaving a room.
• locking a person in a closet.
• a police officer arresting and detaining a suspect without a warrant or legal authority.

Defenses

Criminal defense lawyers draw upon several defense strategies to contest false imprisonment charges. Some of these include showing:

• you had the legal authority to restrain the alleged victim,
• the “victim” consented to the imprisonment,
• you were acting in self-defense,
• the shopkeeper’s privilege applies, and/or
• you were exercising your parental rights.

Penalties

Many violations of California Penal Code Section 236 are charged as misdemeanors. The potential penalties include:

• custody in county jail for up to one year, and/or
• a maximum fine of $1,000.

A prosecutor could charge the crime as a felony if you restrained someone while using

• violence,
• menace,
• fraud or
• deceit.

Felony false imprisonment is punishable by up to three years in jail.

1. How does California law define “false imprisonment”?

California’s false imprisonment laws set forth two forms of false imprisonment. These include:

• misdemeanor false imprisonment, and
• felony false imprisonment.

A prosecutor must prove the following elements to convict you of misdemeanor false imprisonment successfully:

1. you intentionally and unlawfully restrained, detained, or confined a person, and
2. your act made that person stay or go somewhere against that person’s will.¹

Example: Married couple Patty and Harry are having a fight while in their car. Harry tries to leave but Patty turns on the child’s lock so Harry cannot escape.

This qualifies as misdemeanor false imprisonment because Harry is deprived of his freedom of movement against his will. Even if Patty unlocks the door after a few seconds, she could still face charges for the short time she held Harry in the car against his will.

For felony false imprisonment, a prosecutor must prove the following to secure a conviction:

1. you intentionally and unlawfully restrained, confined, or detained someone by violence, menace, fraud, or deceit, and
2. you made the other person stay or go somewhere against that person’s will.²

A few definitions here are helpful:

• an act is done “against a person’s will” if that person does not consent to the act. To consent, a person must act freely and voluntarily and know the nature of the act.³
• “violence” means using physical force that is greater than the force reasonably necessary to restrain someone. Violence may include forms of domestic violence.⁴
• “menace” means a verbal or physical threat of harm, including using a deadly weapon. The threat of harm may be express or implied.⁵

Example: Married couple Patty and Harry are having a fight at home. Harry tries to leave, but Patty threatens to shoot him if he does, so Harry stays put. This qualifies as felony false imprisonment because Patty used “menace” to restrain Harry’s liberty.

Note that false imprisonment does not require that the person being restrained be confined in jail or state prison. False imprisonment can occur in any location.

Also note that false imprisonment is a general intent crime. This means you can be convicted of this crime even if you did not intend to confine someone unlawfully. All that matters is that your intentional actions resulted in the person being unlawfully confined.⁶

Example: Beth pranks Ben by telling him there was a chemical attack, and they take refuge in Beth’s basement for several hours. Beth never specifically intended to confine Ben against his will, though her lie made Ben think it was unsafe to leave. Therefore, Beth could face charges for false imprisonment.

2. What are some common defenses to Penal Code 236 PC?

You have the right to contest a charge of false imprisonment by raising a legal defense.

Six common defenses include:

1. legal authority to restrain.
2. consent.
3. self-defense.
4. shopkeeper’s privilege.
5. parental rights.
6. false allegations

2.1. Legal authority to restrain

This defense is often raised by police officers or law enforcement personnel in false imprisonment cases involving unlawful arrests and detainments. There can be no false imprisonment if you have the legal authority to restrain another person.

For example, a police officer will not face PC 236 charges if he stops and arrests a person while acting according to a valid arrest warrant.

Sometimes a civilian has the right to restrain another person by making a lawful citizen’s arrest.

2.2. Consent

It is always a valid defense for you to show that the so-called victim was there voluntarily and consented to be

• restrained,
• detained, or
• confined.

Helpful evidence to demonstrate consent may include:

• video or audio recordings,
• written communications (such as text messages or email), and
• eyewitness testimony.

2.3. Self-defense

California law allows you to use proportional force in defense of yourself and others if you reasonably believe in good faith that you or others are about to sustain immediate or great bodily injury.

If the victim was threatening to injure themself or commit suicide, you could claim “defense of others” if you confined them to a space where they could not inflict self-harm (and you then contacted help as soon as possible).

2.4. Shopkeeper’s privilege

This defense is available to store owners and shopkeepers who have probable cause that a customer is guilty of shoplifting. The privilege allows you to detain the suspect to investigate. The investigation, though, must be carried out

• for a reasonable time and
• in a reasonable manner.⁷

“Reasonableness” will be determined by the facts of a specific case.

2.5. Parental rights

Parents have the right to discipline their children in ways that restrict their freedom of movement, such as

• “grounding” them or
• imposing “timeouts.”

As long as the children do not sustain injuries or undue suffering, you can lawfully confine your children against their will. This also ensures that you are not acting with any criminal or malicious intent.

2.6. False allegations

Perhaps someone is falsely accusing you out of anger, jealousy, revenge, or a misunderstanding. Or perhaps you are a victim of mistaken identity, and the victim incorrectly picked you out of a lineup.

Video and eyewitness evidence would be invaluable for proving you did nothing wrong.

3. What are the penalties?

California Penal Code 237 is the State’s statute that sets forth the penalties for false imprisonment. Under this section, false imprisonment is a type of wobbler offense, meaning that it can be punished as either

• a misdemeanor or
• a felony.

Misdemeanor false imprisonment, which is false imprisonment accomplished without violence or menace, is punishable by:

• a fine not exceeding $1,000, and/or
• imprisonment in the county jail for not more than one year.⁸

False imprisonment will be charged as a felony when the crime is effected by violence, menace, fraud, or deceit.

Felony false imprisonment is punishable by up to three years in jail and up to $10,000.⁹ The maximum sentence is four years if the victim was :

• an elderly person, or
• a dependent adult.¹⁰

Note sentencing enhancements apply to this crime:

source

PC 236 FALSE IMPRISONMENT LAW – CALIFORNIA PENAL CODE 236

The crime of “false imprisonment” is described under California Penal Code 236. A false imprisonment charge can be filed against you in a situation where you unlawfully deprive someone of their personal liberty. This essentially means intentionally detaining another person without a legal right to do so, and they aren’t allowed to leave when they want to. This would be considered falsely imprisoned.

Penal Code 236 false imprisonment is similar to Penal Code 207 kidnapping charges. However, a kidnapping charge requires moving someone a substantial distance. When someone is simply held or restrained against their will, it’s a false imprisonment offense.

Our criminal defense lawyers have seen a wide range of situations where individuals have been charged with PC 236 false imprisonment. For example, these criminal charges are common in domestic violence incidents. For instance, during a heated confrontation, a husband might grab his wife to prevent her from leaving the home.

Another Penal Code 236 false imprisonment offense includes a situation where married couples are riding in a car and become involved in a heated argument. The wife, wanting to get away from the argument asks to be let out of the vehicle.

The husband refuses and continues with the confrontation. In this scenario, this act could be considered the crime of false imprisonment.

It should be noted that PC 236 false imprisonment can be charged when confinement, detention, or restraint only lasted for a short amount of time.

It’s also important to note that while a false imprisonment charge is not considered as serious as a kidnapping charge, it is still a serious offense that can carry harsh penalties.

Penal Code 236 false imprisonment is a California “wobbler” offense that can be charged as either a misdemeanor or felony crime, depending on the facts and circumstances of the case. Aggravated trespassing is defined under Penal Code 601 PC.

To give readers a better understanding of false imprisonment law described under Penal Code 236, our criminal defense attorneys are providing an overview below.

DEFINITION OF PENAL CODE 236 FALSE IMPRISONMENT

California Penal Code 236 PC defines false imprisonment as the unlawful violation of the personal liberty of someone else. To violate someone’s person’s liberty means a sustained restriction of their freedom using violence, duress, fraud, deceit.

It also includes using a threat of unlawful injury in circumstances where someone receiving the threat reasonably believes the person making the threat has the ability to carry it out.

In order for the prosecutor to convict you of misdemeanor a false imprisonment charge, they must be able to prove all the elements of the crime listed under CALCRIM 1242 Jury Instructions:

• You intentionally and unlawfully detained, restrained, or confined someone
• Your act made someone stay or go somewhere against their will

An act is done against someone’s will if that person didn’t consent to the act freely and voluntarily and knew the nature of the act.

PENALTIES FOR PENAL CODE 236 FALSE IMPRISONMENT

If convicted of Penal Code 236 false imprisonment, it’s normally a misdemeanor offense that carries up to one year in a county jail, and fine up to $1,000.

However, you could face felony false imprisonment charges, see CALCRIM 1240, if violence, menace, fraud, or deceit was used in the restraint.  Menace is the threat of violence, but doesn’t always have to be verbal threats, but could be implied by your behavior.

If convicted of a PC 236 felony crime, you are facing up to three years in a California state prison, and a fine up to $10,000. source

California Penal Code 236/237: False Imprisonment

Legal Definition: False imprisonment is the unlawful violation of the personal liberty of another.

For a person to be convicted of a violation of PC 236 the prosecution must prove the following:

1. You intentionally and unlawfully restrained/detained/confined a person; AND
2. Your act made that person stay or go somewhere against that person’s will.

What does this mean?

This doesn’t mean what you may think because of the word Imprisonment – there is no actual requirement that the person is actually restrained in some kind of jail or prison. For this charge to be a felony, in addition to the above, you must also use violence or menace against the other party you’re restraining. Violence in false imprisonment means when you use physical force against a person that is greater than the amount necessary to restrain a person. Menace means verbal or threatening actions that expressly/impliedly communicate a threat of harm. An example of using violence could be physically grabbing and holding another person, making them unable to leave. Using menace would be you telling another person that if they move, you will kill them.

The charge itself is relatively straightforward, it simply means you would allow another person to leave against their will, and without their consent. An act is done against a person’s will if that person does not consent to the act. In order to consent, a person must act freely and voluntarily and know the nature of the act.

Penalties

PC 236 is a wobbler offense. A wobbler offense is one that, based on certain mitigating or aggravating facts, can be charged as a misdemeanor offense, or a felony offense. If you are convicted of a misdemeanor offense, you could be sentenced to up to one year in County Jail. If you are convicted of a felony offense, you could be sentenced for upwards of 16 months, two years or three years in State Prison. You would be required to serve 50% of that sentence.

Common Defenses

1. Statute of Limitations
2. Insufficient Evidence
3. Mistake of Fact
4. Violation of your Rights

One of the most common ways to defend against this crime is to attack the allegation that you used violence or menace to restrain a person. Menace is easily dispelled if you never say anything to the other person. Violence is almost always arguable, but certain factors that matter are the size of yourself, and the victim, the history and relationship between you and the other party, and whether you have made threats to the other person in the past.

source

DUE PROCESS READS>>>>>>

Due Process vs Substantive Due Process learn more HERE

Understanding Due Process  – This clause caused over 200 overturns in just DNA alone Click Here

Mathews v. Eldridge – Due Process – 5th, & 14th Amendment

 Mathews Test – 3 Part Test– Amdt5.4.5.4.2 Mathews Test

“Unfriending” Evidence – 5th Amendment

At the Intersection of Technology and Law

What Is Traversing a Warrant (a Franks Motion)?

Dwayne Furlow v. Jon Belmar – Police Warrant – Immunity Fail – 4th, 5th, & 14th Amendment

Obstruction of Justice and Abuse of Process

What Is Considered Obstruction of Justice in California?

ARE PEOPLE LYING ON YOU?
CAN YOU PROVE IT? IF YES…. THEN YOU ARE IN LUCK!

Penal Code 115 PC – Filing a False Document in California

Penal Code 118 PC – California Penalty of “Perjury” Law

Federal Perjury – Definition by Law

Penal Code 132 PC – Offering False Evidence

Penal Code 134 PC – Preparing False Evidence

Crimes Against Public Justice

Penal Code 118.1 PC – Police Officer$ Filing False Report$

Spencer v. Peters– Police Fabrication of Evidence – 14th Amendment

Lying Cop or Citizen – PC 129 – Preparing False Statement or Report Under Oath

Penal Code 132 PC – Offering False Evidence

Penal Code 134 PC – Preparing False Evidence

Penal Code 135 PC – Destroying or Concealing Evidence

Lying Cop or Citizen – PC 129 – Preparing False Statement or Report Under Oath

Penal Code 141 PC – Planting or Tampering with Evidence in California

Penal Code 142 PC – Peace Officer Refusing to Arrest or Receive Person Charged with Criminal Offense

PC 146 Penal Code – False Arrest

Penal Code 148.5 PC –  Making a False Police Report in California

Misuse of the Warrant System – California Penal Code § 170

Penal Code 182 PC – “Criminal Conspiracy” Laws & Penalties

Penal Code § 236 PC – False Imprisonment

Penal Code 664 PC – “Attempted Crimes” in California

Penal Code 31 PC – Aiding and Abetting Laws

Penal Code 32 PC – Accessory After the Fact

What is Abuse of Process? 

What is a Due Process Violation? – 4th Amendment & 14th Amendment

What’s the Difference between Abuse of Process, Malicious Prosecution and False Arrest?

Defeating Extortion and Abuse of Process in All Their Ugly Disguises

The Use and Abuse of Power by Prosecutors (Justice for All)

 Under 42 U.S.C. $ection 1983 – Recoverable Damage$

42 U.S. Code § 1983 – Civil Action for Deprivation of Right$

18 U.S. Code § 242 – Deprivation of Right$ Under Color of Law

18 U.S. Code § 241 – Conspiracy against Right$

Section 1983 Lawsuit – How to Bring a Civil Rights Claim

 Suing for Misconduct – Know More of Your Right$

Police Misconduct in California – How to Bring a Lawsuit

How to File a complaint of Police Misconduct? (Tort Claim Forms here as well)

Deprivation of Rights – Under Color of the Law

What is Sua Sponte and How is it Used in a California Court? 

Removing Corrupt Judges, Prosecutors, Jurors
and other Individuals & Fake Evidence from Your Case 

Anti-SLAPP Law in California

Freedom of Assembly – Peaceful Assembly – 1st Amendment Right

How to Recover “Punitive Damages” in a California Personal Injury Case

Pro Se Forms and Forms Information(Tort Claim Forms here as well)

What is Tort?

Tort Claims Form
File Government Claim for Eligible Compensation

Complete and submit the Government Claim Form, including the required $25 filing fee or Fee Waiver Request, and supporting documents, to the GCP.

See Information Guides and Resources below for more information.

Tort Claims – Claim for Damage, Injury, or Death (see below)

Federal –  Federal SF-95 Tort Claim Form Tort Claim online here or download it here or here from us

California – California Tort Claims Act – California Tort Claim Form Here or here from us

Complaint for Violation of Civil Rights (Non-Prisoner Complaint) and also UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT PDF

Taken from the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Forms source

WRITS and WRIT Types in the United States

Can I Use Text Messages in My California Divorce?

Two-Steps And Voila: How To Authenticate Text Messages

How Your Texts Can Be Used As Evidence?

California Supreme Court Rules:
Text Messages Sent on Private Government Employees Lines
Subject to Open Records Requests

case law: City of San Jose v. Superior Court – Releasing Private Text/Phone Records of Government  Employees

Public Records Practices After the San Jose Decision

The Decision Briefing Merits After the San Jose Decision

Rules of Admissibility – Evidence Admissibility

Confrontation Clause – Sixth Amendment

Exceptions To The Hearsay Rule – Confronting Evidence

Prosecutor’s Obligation to Disclose Exculpatory Evidence

Successful Brady/Napue Cases – Suppression of Evidence

Cases Remanded or Hearing Granted Based on Brady/Napue Claims

Unsuccessful But Instructive Brady/Napue Cases

ABA – Functions and Duties of the Prosecutor – Prosecution Conduct

Frivolous, Meritless or Malicious Prosecution – fiduciary duty

Section 832.7 – Peace officer or custodial officer personnel records

Senate Bill No. 1421 – California Public Records Act

Assembly Bill 748 Makes Video Evidence Captured by Police Agencies Subject to Disclosure as Public Records

SB 2, Creating Police Decertification Process and Expanding Civil Liability Exposure

The Right To Know: How To Fulfill The Public’s Right Of Access To Police Records

How Access to California Police Records

Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department SB-1421 Records

 SB1421 – Form Access to California Police Records

California Statewide CPRA Requests Submit a CPRA Request 

Electronic Audio Recording Request of OC Court Hearings

Here is the Public Records Service Act Portal for all of CALIFORNIA Click Here

Police BodyCam Footage Release

GRANDPARENT CASE LAW 

Do Grandparents Have Visitation Rights? If there is an Established Relationship then Yes

Third “PRESUMED PARENT” Family Code 7612(C) – Requires Established Relationship Required

Cal State Bar PDF to read about Three Parent Law –
The State Bar of California family law news issue4 2017 vol. 39, no. 4.pdf

Distinguishing Request for Custody from Request for Visitation

Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57 (2000) – Grandparents – 14th Amendment

S.F. Human Servs. Agency v. Christine C. (In re Caden C.)

9.32 Particular Rights – Fourteenth Amendment – Interference with Parent / Child Relationship

Child’s Best Interest in Custody Cases

When is a Joinder in a Family Law Case Appropriate? – Reason for Joinder

Joinder In Family Law Cases – CRC Rule 5.24

GrandParents Rights To Visit
Family Law Packet OC Resource Center
Family Law Packet SB Resource Center

Motion to vacate an adverse judgment

Mandatory Joinder vs Permissive Joinder – Compulsory vs Dismissive Joinder

When is a Joinder in a Family Law Case Appropriate?

Kyle O. v. Donald R. (2000) 85 Cal.App.4th 848

Punsly v. Ho (2001) 87 Cal.App.4th 1099

Zauseta v. Zauseta (2002) 102 Cal.App.4th 1242

S.F. Human Servs. Agency v. Christine C. (In re Caden C.)

Ian J. v. Peter M

Download Here this Recommended Citation