Business Opinions & Optics Corruption Over the Years Legal News The Motivation Top Stories Zee Truthful News

Our Opinion of EPGR Lawyers Review – Morally Integrity or Not? You Decide – Reviews

ByThe Truth News

Feb 4, 2025 #are EPGR Lawyers any good?, #do EPGR Lawyers suck ?, #EPGR Lawyer Review, #EPGR Lawyers Review, #EPGR Lawyers Reviews, #Review of EPGR Lawyers

Our Opinion of EPGR Lawyers Review – Morally Integrity or Not? You Decide – Reviews

EPGR Lawyers Review

They hired Paul Toepel and with just a brief Google Search you can see his reputation is shit by landing on sites reading the material and doing due dillegence on the new attorney hire. looksing up police reports that are posted on this site is easy

police reports that prove Mr. Paul Toepel lies in police reports.

Most likely because throwing shade on people he intends to victimize by maniplating the law into seeing a persona he created

if they cannot do a basic google search and find trash on the first page they are not diligent in our opinion

Paul Toepel is a shitty attorney in our opinion and a liar as fact!

EPGR Lawyers Review

are EPGR Lawyers any good?

2024 THEY APPEARD TO BE 2.3 LOSERS BY OPINION OF COMMON SENSE WHEN VIEWING A RATING, later they APPEARD TO HAVE closed the listing above MAYBE THE SHITTY RATING OF 2.3 MAYBE NOT ?

NOW THEY APPEAR TO BE 5 STAR STUNNERS WOW SUCH SCUM WITH NO INTEGRITY IN MY OPININON

THIS IS SHADY IN MY HONEST OPINION BUT WAIT THERES MORE………

IF YOUR LOOKING FOR A GOOD ATTORNEY I PERSONALLY WOULD START OF WITH 3 THINGS

LONG STANDING REPUTATION THAT HAS STOOD THE TEST OF TIME

MORAL INTEGRITY

ASK WOULD YOU LIE TO WIN

CHECK THE BAR FOR DISCIPLINARY

CLEAR SET PRICE VIA CONTRACT

ANSWERS SHOULD BE

GREAT

VISIBLE

NO

NONE

CLEAR

IF YOU THINK THE ACTIONS AND BEHAVIORS SEEN HERE ARE GOOD, THEN HIRE THEM, I would if I agreed with that statement. I have not done any business with them at all. I PERONALLY WOULD NEVER CHOOSE PEOPLE WHO OPERATE IN A WAY THAT DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE CLEAR UPFRONT HONEST AND WITH INTEGRITY… IT COULD BE JUST ME SO WE GATHERED THIS INFO TO LET YOU AS POSSIBLE PONTETNIAL CLIENTS DECIDE!

the more info to make an informed decision is great for the outcome, your $$, and peace of mind!

choose them if you like to or not decide with your brain that way the public info gathered here can elighten your mind.

Finding a lawyer now a days is hard with all this google stuff.

To be quite frank, I often wonder about 5 star reveiws as well.

Were they made too long ago?

Were they made frequently close days or weeks like a pattern?
Were they hot for a cool week or month or 2 then fell off with reviews ?
did they have a past reveiw page that was negative ?

did they start a new lsitng and have an old one or just start a new business ?

these are things I also would look into

either way its your life, your time, your money!

WHO KNOWS WHY EPGR HAD 3 REVIEWS THAT TOTALED A 2.3 STAR 4 YEARS AGO

NOW THEY HAVE 2 REVIEWS 5 STAR STUNNERS AND THEY ARE NOT 4 YEARS OLD. SEEMS LIKE LOTS OF PEOPLE DECIEVE IN MY OPINION!|

1 LESS REVEIW AND A PERFECT RATING LOOKS FISHY LIKE! NOW THEY CAN SAY THEY MOVED ADDRESS, BUT GOOGLE ALLOWS A BUSINESS LISTING TO MOVE Google requires that businesses reverify their listings after certain edits BY MAILING A POSTCARD TO THE UPDATED ADDRESS SO THAT COULD NOT BE THE REASON IN MY OPINION. CLOSING A GOOGLE LISTING AND BURNING IT! CREATING A NEW ONE AT A NEW ADDRESS WILL GET AROUND THE BAD REVIEWS THIS IS A FACTUAL WAY ANYONE CAN DO THAT! IN ANYONES OPINION LOOKING AT THIS WHAT DO YOU THINK ?

EPGR LAWYERS FOR YOU ?

NOW CHECK OUT THIS PLAQUE AS THE COMPANY WHO SELLS THE, FOR A MEMBERSHIP

https://www.lawyersofdistinction.com/benefits/custom-plaque/

WHERE THEY BOUGHT A MEMBERSHIP TO RECEIVE THIS ACCORDING TO THE LITERATURE

IT CLEARLY SAYS ON THE SITE THESE SMUCKS BOUGHT IT AT THAT ALL TIERS GET ONE

one of the founders ERWIN paid for 1 too!

and at times there server appears unsecure

one of their attorneys who frames people and openly commit heinous perjury has a business of his own that looks dead to us ? you take a look

YOU VS ME

OUR SMALL NEWSPAPER HAS A $9 AD CLICK VALUYE THAT WE CAN CHARGE PER CLICK ON HOSTED ADS

READ THEIRS ABOVE 0 CENTS AND 0.1 CENTS RESPECTIVELY

Paul toepel a man who harasses elderly parents of a past opposing client

he has framed that man

perjured himself to police

he is a manipulator in my honest opinion

EPGR Lawyers did hire this man so I beleive Paul Toepel comits criminal acts to gain an advantage

he lacks morals and violates bar rules and penal codes in my opinion.

Rule 1.1 Competence

Rule 1.2.1 Advising or Assisting the Violation of Law – LYING TO COPS SO THEY COMMIT A CRIME AGAINST ME LIKE MISUSE OF THE WARRANT SYSTEM DUE TO LIES AND MANIPULATION PERPETRATED BY THIS BITCH ASS MAN Misuse of the Warrant System – California Penal Code § 170 – Crimes Against Public Justice – 4th, 5th, & 14th Amendment AND THIS Penal Code 118.1 PC – Police Officer$ Filing False Report$

Rule 1.3 Diligence

Rule 2.122. Conduct Towards Other Attorneys, the Court and Participants

Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information PAUL TOEPEL got our family information from a case he was hired by me EX Marcia Robertson via a Family Law Case, he took that information he obtained from that family law case and used it against me elsewhere.

Rule 3.3: Candor Toward the Tribunal

– USING THIS IN FAMILY COURT AND CRIMINAL COURT HIS CRAZY LIE AND his false claims and email are proof of his nefarious behavior, now I know why my family law attorneys would quit a few days after signing up, he pumps them with fear! a fear monger tyring to leave me defenseless this is misconduct at the highest order especially wnen he lies to get his point across. THE CASE WILL BE INFRONT OF A JUDGE ONE DAY SO HE SHOULD KNOW HE ADDED ANOTHER VIOLATION IN FUTURE!

Rule 3.4 Fairness to Opposing Party and Counsel – his false claims and email are proof of his nefarious behavior, now I know why my family law attorneys would quit a few days after signing up, he pumps them with fear! a fear monger tyring to leave me defenseless this is misconduct at the highest order especially wnen he lies to get his point across.
Rule 3.5 Impartiality and Decorum of the Tribunal
Rule 3.7 Lawyer as Witness

Rule 4.1 Truthfulness in Statements to Others – – his false claims and email are proof of his nefarious behavior, now I know why my family law attorneys would quit a few days after signing up, he pumps them with fear! a fear monger tyring to leave me defenseless this is misconduct at the highest order especially wnen he lies to get his point across.

Rule 4.4 Respect for Rights of Third Persons – his false claims and email are proof of his nefarious behavior, now I know why my family law attorneys would quit a few days after signing up, he pumps them with fear! a fear monger tyring to leave me defenseless this is misconduct at the highest order especially wnen he lies to get his point across.

Rule 8.3 Reporting Professional Misconduct ( some attorney should report him) maybe a DA should! they are an attorney and they like TRUTH I believe! maybe tell on yourself bitch!

Rule 8.4 Misconduct

California Rule of Professional Conduct 5-200(B) prohibits lawyers from misleading a judge, judicial officer, or jury by artifice or false statement . Rule 5-200 also requires lawyers to use means that are consistent with truth.
Business and Professions Code § 6106 – Dishonesty, whether or not committed while acting as an attorney, is considered an act of moral turpitude and is prohibited.
California Code, Business and Professions Code – BPC § 6068It is the duty of an attorney to do all of the following:
1. To support the Constitution and laws of the United States and of this state.
2. To maintain the respect due to the courts of justice and judicial officers.
3. To counsel or maintain those actions, proceedings, or defenses only as appear to him or her legal or just, except the defense of a person charged with a public offense.
4. To employ, for the purpose of maintaining the causes confided to him or her those means only as are consistent with truth, and never to seek to mislead the judge or any judicial officer by an artifice or false statement of fact or law.
6. To advance no fact prejudicial to the honor or reputation of a party or witness, unless required by the justice of the cause with which he or she is charged.
7. Not to encourage either the commencement or the continuance of an action or proceeding from any corrupt motive of passion or interest.
Business and Professions Code – BPC § 6067 – Every person on his admission shall take an oath to support the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of California, and faithfully to discharge the duties of any attorney at law to the best of his knowledge and ability.

as a reminder here is some basics

Preamble: A Lawyer’s Responsibilities

[1] A lawyer, as a member of the legal profession, is a representative of clients, an officer of the legal system and a public citizen having special responsibility for the quality of justice.

[2] As a representative of clients, a lawyer performs various functions. As advisor, a lawyer provides a client with an informed understanding of the client’s legal rights and obligations and explains their practical implications. As advocate, a lawyer zealously asserts the client’s position under the rules of the adversary system. As negotiator, a lawyer seeks a result advantageous to the client but consistent with requirements of honest dealings with others. As an evaluator, a lawyer acts by examining a client’s legal affairs and reporting about them to the client or to others.

[3] In addition to these representational functions, a lawyer may serve as a third-party neutral, a nonrepresentational role helping the parties to resolve a dispute or other matter. Some of these Rules apply directly to lawyers who are or have served as third-party neutrals. See, e.g., Rules 1.12 and 2.4. In addition, there are Rules that apply to lawyers who are not active in the practice of law or to practicing lawyers even when they are acting in a nonprofessional capacity. For example, a lawyer who commits fraud in the conduct of a business is subject to discipline for engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation. See Rule 8.4.

[4] In all professional functions a lawyer should be competent, prompt and diligent. A lawyer should maintain communication with a client concerning the representation. A lawyer should keep in confidence information relating to representation of a client except so far as disclosure is required or permitted by the Rules of Professional Conduct or other law.

[5] A lawyer’s conduct should conform to the requirements of the law, both in professional service to clients and in the lawyer’s business and personal affairs. A lawyer should use the law’s procedures only for legitimate purposes and not to harass or intimidate others. A lawyer should demonstrate respect for the legal system and for those who serve it, including judges, other lawyers and public officials. While it is a lawyer’s duty, when necessary, to challenge the rectitude of official action, it is also a lawyer’s duty to uphold legal process. source

and they took the following OATH

OATH ON ADMISSION

I, , DO SOLEMNLY SWEAR THAT AS AN ATTORNEY AND AS A COUNSELOR OF
THIS COURT I WILL CONDUCT MYSELF UPRIGHTLY AND ACCORDING TO LAW, AND THAT I WILL SUPPORT THE CONSTITUTION OF
THE UNITED STATES.

source

Rule 3.4 Fairness to Opposing Party and Counsel

his false claims and email are proof of his nefarious behavior, now I know why my family law attorneys would quit a few days after signing up, he pumps them with fear! a fear monger tyring to leave me defenseless this is misconduct at the highest order especially wnen he lies to get his point across.

did he forget Rule 3.4: Fairness to Opposing Party & Counsel?
or Rule 4.2 of the Rules of Professional Conduct governs communication with a represented person?

maybe he forgot his team and himself have to rat him out

Rule 8.3 Misconduct: According to California law, a lawyer is required to report another lawyer if they have credible evidence that the other lawyer has committed a serious ethical violation In California, if opposing counsel is attempting to get your lawyer to quit the case, they can only do so ethically by filing a formal motion with the court to have your lawyer removed, citing specific reasons like a conflict of interest, unethical conduct, or the lawyer’s inability to effectively represent you, which must be supported by evidence; otherwise, aggressive tactics aimed at pressuring your lawyer to withdraw could be considered unprofessional and potentially subject to disciplinary action by the State Bar of California

what kind of scum calls oposing coucnel to try and leave him without a lawyer ?

SCUM that what type. someone who tossed moral integrity and fairness in the trash! in our opinion

Will You Matter to me? Never! Will I matter to you? Everyday it seems!

Who has free rent inside your little weasel mind ? That you voluntarily give up due to lacking of control of you and your mind, your greed, your selfishness Paul it seems so sad to see you abuse elderly for things they made and you you still have no house from what i see! and with the traffic EPGR gets you all eat top ramen maybe not sure but their aint much moving on the net!

These are only some of the lying words out of this mans mouth that he has said about me

He comfortably defames a mans fatherhood in open court with straight up lies! Tells lies about me while also lying about the whereabouts of a wanted fugitive sex offender in my sons mothers house (against a Judges orders)! He has told the judge himself Nigel is never is with Michael and has moved out!
yet check out the photo proof Click here to see all the proof of what Toepel helped keep around children The toepel doings

In my opinion Paul Toepel has no conscience! He definitely manipulates the truth!

Gun to his sons head is one of his greatest lines (click here to read his own words via transcript and here him say another opposite verbally 2 faced lying snake)! another is that Mr. Zullo and his Mother were arrested at one of his cleints work… Kaiser Los Angeles… these lies he speaks are in trnascripts! all under penalty of perjury liar! lying (click here) as a laywer is a crime, Penal Code 118PC Perjury and California Penal Code 126 states that perjury is punishable by imprisonment for two, three, or four years under subdivision (h) of Section 1170 making it a criminal offense when he is finally prosecuted one day for this felony

yet check out the photo proof Click here to see all the proof of Toepel’s Doing

Paul Toepel has no conscience! He definitely manipulates the truth!

this is called PC 118 PERJURY and its to mislead police so that they can write a false implied story to a district attorney which will lead to a court hearing all on a false persona and image created by PAUL D TOEPEL JR. LIAR LAWYER

HERE IS THE VERBATIM PERJURY THE LAWYER NAMED PAUL TOEPEL DID DO

028-077 GGPD #22022279 Page 9 GARDEN GROVE PD REPORT

Zullo has been known to recruit the assistance of his mother. On or around June 22, 2022,

Zullo’s mother, Theresa Zullo, was arrested for trespassing at a Kaiser mental health facility

in downtown Los Angeles. At the time of her arrest, Theresa was caught trying to access the

building with the intention of passing out hundreds of flyers she had in her possession.

The flyers contained derogatory content against and Zullo’s ex-wife, who at the time, worked at

that Kaiser facility. did not have a police report number to reference at the time of this interview.

This never happened like dozens of his claims and false statements and here is a copy of my mother’s criminal record for the last 12 years! So, what is it that he is doing in a police station giving false statement in paperwork (perjury) that will lead to a court proceeding, this is rule 8.4misconduct He literally filed charges that I robbed his bank account for $7500 as well in the same report! He should be arrested in court today for all he has caused to my freedoms!

A SIMPLE ARREST SEARCH ON THAT TIME FRAM FOR BOTH PERSONS WOULD HAVE SOLVED THAT LIE, DUMB LOW IQ POLICE WITH NO DETECTIVE SKILLS, NO FORETHOUGHT, JUST EATING UP PAULY’S LIES, and writing them down, NICE PERJURY PAUL!