Evidence – Page 8 – Good Shepherd News – Fastest Growing Religious, Free Speech & Political Content

Criminal Appeal Digital Discovery Evidence Family Appeals Case Law Laws Legal News The Motivation Motions Prosecution Standards Recusal & Conflicts of Interest Retaliatory Arrests & Prosecution Rights Sanctions & Attorney Fees Self Help Sex Crimes With Children Supreme Court - SCOTUS Tort

Major Exceptions To The Hearsay Rule

March 1, 2023 The Truth News

Major Exceptions To The Hearsay Rule REVIEW OF THE CALIFORNIA HEARSAY RULE – EVIDENCE CODE 1200 California’s “hearsay rule,” defined under Evidence Code 1200, is a law that states that…

Digital Discovery Evidence Laws Legal News The Motivation Motions Prosecution Standards Retaliatory Arrests & Prosecution Rights Self Help

Rules of Admissibility – Evidence Admissibility

January 31, 2023 The Truth News

RULES OF ADMISSIBILITY Evidence Admissibility WHAT ARE THE RULES OF ADMISSIBILITY IN CALIFORNIA CRIMINAL CASES? In any criminal trial, the prosecution bears the burden of proving the defendant’s guilt beyond…

Anti-SLAPP Law in California

January 16, 2023 The Truth News

Anti-SLAPP Law in California 1st Amendment Freedom of Press & Speech What is Anti-SLAPP? Short for strategic lawsuits against public participation, SLAPPs have become an all-too-common tool for intimidating and…

Corruption Over the Years Criminal Appeal Evidence Laws Legal News The Motivation Motions Prosecution Standards Recusal & Conflicts of Interest Retaliatory Arrests & Prosecution Rights Sanctions & Attorney Fees Self Help Tort

Removing Corrupt Judges, Prosecutors, Jurors and other Individuals & Fake Evidence from Your Case

January 14, 2023 The Truth News

Removing Corrupt Judges, Prosecutors, Jurors and other Individuals & Fake Evidence from Your Case A defendant in a criminal case does not choose which district attorney will be assigned. Nor…

Conviction Integrity Unit (“CIU”) of the Orange County District Attorney OCDA

January 8, 2023 The Truth News

Conviction Integrity Unit The wrongful conviction of an innocent person should be every prosecutor’s greatest concern (FUCKING LAUGHABLE AT BEST OC DA IS A HARD NOSED ASHOLE MORON VINDICTIVE 2…

14th Amendment 4th Amendment 5th Amendment Discovery Evidence Family Appeals Case Law Legal News The Motivation Motions Rights Self Help

Policy 814: Discovery Requests – Orange County Sheriff-Coroner Department

December 29, 2022 The Truth News

Policy 814: Discovery Requests – Orange County Sheriff-Coroner Department Policy 814 Orange County Sheriff-Coroner Department Orange County SD Policy Manual Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2021/02/26, All Rights Reserved. Published with permission…

Clarence Brandenburg, 48, an officer in the Ku Klux Klan, left, and Richard Hanna, 21, admitted member of the American Nazi Party, pose for a picture following their arrests, Aug. 8, 1964, Cincinnati, Ohio. Brandenburg was arrested in connection with a KKK meeting in which he made anti-Semitic and anti-black statements and advocated for the possibility of "revengeance." The Supreme Court threw out his conviction and issued a new test: Advocacy could be punished only "where such advocacy is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action." (AP Photo)

1st Amendment Corruption Over the Years Evidence Guidelines and help Laws Legal News The Motivation Rights Self Help Supreme Court - SCOTUS Tort

The ‘Brandenburg test’ for incitement to violence – 1st Amendment

November 7, 2022 The Truth News

The ‘Brandenburg test’ for incitement to violence In 1969, the U.S. Supreme Court made history by ruling that, to merit conviction, the violence advocated must be intended, likely and imminent.…

An anti-Vietnam War protester, Robert Watts, was prosecuted and convicted for threatening President Lyndon B. Johnson after he said at an anti-war rally, "If they ever make me carry a rifle, the first man I want to get in my sights in L.B.J." The case went to the Supreme Court, which said that Watts' remark was the sort of "political hyperbole" that did not constitute a true threat, and ruled the statute that criminalized threats against the president as unconstitutional on its face. Later, courts used the "Watts factors" in true-threat analysis, considering the context of the threat, the conditional nature and reaction of the listeners. The Watts case came during a time of multiple marches and protests against the war, as the one shown here in Washington D.C. in October 1967 where a sign reads "GET THE HELLicopters OUT OF VIETNAM." (Photo, public domain via Wikimedia Commons)

1st Amendment Corruption Over the Years Evidence Laws Legal News The Motivation Rights Self Help Supreme Court - SCOTUS Tort

True Threats – Virginia v. Black is most comprehensive Supreme Court definition – 1st Amendment

November 5, 2022 The Truth News

True Threats – Virginia v. Black is most comprehensive Supreme Court definition By Kevin Francis O’Neill (Updated June 2017 by David L. Hudson Jr.) In legal parlance a true threat…

Criminal Appeal Evidence Laws Legal News The Motivation Motions Rights Self Help

CR-120 Notice of Appeal – Felony 1237, 1237.5, 1538.5(m)

October 29, 2022 The Truth News

CR-120 Notice of Appeal – Felony 1237, 1237.5, 1538.5(m) Notice of Appeal—Felony (Defendant) (CR-120) Tells the trial court and the other party that the defendant wants to appeal the trial…

1st Amendment Discovery Evidence Family Appeals Case Law Motions Retaliatory Arrests & Prosecution Self Help Tort

CPRA Request Report / BodyCam Release / Incident Report Request / Other Data from for Orange County California

October 29, 2022 The Truth News

CPRA Request Report / BodyCam Release / Incident Report Request / Other Data from for California and the OCSD WHAT IS THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RECORDS ACT? In 1968, the California…