Paul Toepel Criminal Lawyer (LIAR)
Paul Toepel Attorney
He lives here, maybe the local community should get together AND LET THE MAN KNOW THAT SEX OFFENDERS SHOULD NOT BE NEXT TO CHILDREN AND USING HIS LAW DEGREE TO LIE IN COURT AND HELP A SEX OFFENDER AROUND A PROTECTIVE ORDER PROTECTING THE MINOR VICTIM IS OK TO LET HIM KNOW PEACEFULLY our rights to be vocal WE DO THIS THROUGH PEACEFUL ASSEMBLY AND LETTING HIM KNOW, MAYBE HE WAS NEVER TOLD AND THAT IS OK, WE ALL DO NOT GET GREAT PARENTS
13381 Mitchell Ave.
Garden Grove, CA 92843
(714) 534-5243
WE HAVE THE RIGHT AS US CITIZENS TO PEACEFULLY ASSEMBLE QUIETLY AND NOT TRESPASS NOT BLOCK ACCESS TO ANY ROAD OR PATHWAY AND HAND OUT LEAFLETS OF TRUTHFUL INFORMATION THAT CONTAINS NEWS OF INDIVIDUALS AND THEIR TRUTHFUL ACTIONS, JUST LIKE FOX NEWS 11 AND THE BIDEN LAPTOP. BUT STILL PLEASE DONT BOTHER ANYONE HERE AT THE ADDRESS ABOVE
PEACEFUL PROTEST INVOLVES BEING KIND HOLDING YOUR SIGN OR LEAFLETS AND GETTING YOUR MESSAGE ACROSS. YOU CANNOT BLOCK SIDEWALK, SHE IS NOT BELOW. YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO BLOCK OTHERS MOVEMENT. SO STAY OUT OF PEOPLE’S WAY OF MOVEMENT AND BE CALM HOLD YOUR SIGN AND KEEP UP YOUR DOINGS !
Jude 1:11
(11) Woe to them! For they have gone in the way of Cain, have run greedily in the error of Balaam for profit, and perished in the rebellion of Korah.
The video above is about genius’, the video is not about Paul Toepel, it has nothing to do with him just an entertaining video of genius’
WANT TO SEE ALL OF PAUL’S VIOLATIONS IN THAT IN OUR OPINION HE HAS COMITTED IS HERE
Paul Toepel Criminal Lawyer (LIAR) IS OUR OPINION
This man has no relationship with the truth and that is provable by callus blatant lies to Garden Grove Police, Judges and Courts
HAVE YOU HAD TO DEAL WITH SCUM? READ THIS Quotes for Those Strong and of Good Nature
Honest Opinion Paul Toepel is Criminal Lying Attorney –
Soon to be Sued and should and must be Disbarred fight aint over cheating liar!
HIS OWN WORDS & DOINGS AT GARDEN GROVE POLICE STATION POINT THIS WAY
How to Sue and Take Care of A Malicious Lawyer – Use His Actions, Use His Words AGAINST HIM
“He put a gun to his sons head, I think!“ once said the lying Paul Toepel
These are only some of the lying words out of this mans mouth that he has said about me
He comfortably defames a mans fatherhood in open court with straight up lies! Tells lies about me while also lying about the whereabouts of a wanted fugitive sex offender in my sons mothers house (against a Judges orders)! He has told the judge himself Nigel is never is with Michael and has moved out!
yet check out the photo proof Click here to see all the proof of what Toepel helped keep around children The toepel doings
In my opinion Paul Toepel has no conscience! He definitely manipulates the truth!
Gun to his sons head is one of his greatest lines (click here to read his own words via transcript and here him say another opposite verbally 2 faced lying snake)! another is that Mr. Zullo and his Mother were arrested at one of his cleints work… Kaiser Los Angeles… these lies he speaks are in trnascripts! all under penalty of perjury liar! lying (click here) as a laywer is a crime, Penal Code 118PC Perjury and California Penal Code 126 states that perjury is punishable by imprisonment for two, three, or four years under subdivision (h) of Section 1170 making it a criminal offense when he is finally prosecuted one day for this felony
yet check out the photo proof Click here to see all the proof of Toepel’s Doing
Paul Toepel has no conscience! He definitely manipulates the truth!
Anti-SLAPP Law in California
are you all slow or just easily conned by this lying defamatory man Mr. Paul Toepel Jr.
HINT! the rabbit hole will not conceal the lies he has told, it reveals them!
USE IN A SENTENCE:
- The amount of esoteric lies in that police report of his is tremendously atrocious! You would have to be one dumb slow non due diligent idiot to believe this guy Paul Toepel over here! Can you imagine he tells the police such an easily searchable lie like the one below.
- The esoteric facts are only for the intellects to sort out and when I do sort out the facts the world will know of them and your real doings…. there are laws for setting me up! remember that Paul, you are just a butt hurt with tiny feelings and a huge vindictive payback routine you have a completely failed at business and that’s your fault, not mine!
DEFFEND YOUR PERJURY TO THE BAR ASSHOLE
NEXT WILL BE A TORT CLAIM TO YOU AND YOUR LAW FIRM THE WHACKED LAW OFFICES OF PAULD TOEPEL JR. PUNK BOY
Here is PAUL TOEPEL LYING HIS LIES HERE IS A a VERBATIM copy of a portion of his testimony to Garden Grove Police THIS IS A CRIME!
028-077 GGPD #22022279 Page 9 GARDEN GROVE PD REPORT
Zullo has been known to recruit the assistance of his mother. On or around June 22, 2022,
Zullo’s mother, Theresa Zullo, was arrested for trespassing at a Kaiser mental health facility
in downtown Los Angeles. At the time of her arrest, Theresa was caught trying to access the
building with the intention of passing out hundreds of flyers she had in her possession.
The flyers contained derogatory content against and Zullo’s ex-wife, who at the time, worked at
that Kaiser facility. did not have a police report number to reference at the time of this interview.
This never happened like dozens of his claims and false statements and here is a copy of my mother’s criminal record for the last 12 years! So, what is it that he is doing in a police station giving false statement in paperwork (perjury) that will lead to a court proceeding, this is rule 8.4misconduct He literally filed charges that I robbed his bank account for $7500 as well in the same report! He should be arrested in court today for all he has caused to my freedoms!
A SIMPLE ARREST SEARCH ON THAT TIME FRAM FOR BOTH PERSONS WOULD HAVE SOLVED THAT LIE, DUMB LOW IQ POLICE WITH NO DETECTIVE SKILLS, NO FORETHOUGHT, JUST EATING UP PAULY’S LIES, and writing them down, NICE PERJURY PAUL!
WE BELIEVE HE HAS COMMITTED SOME SERIOUS CRIMES BELOW BUT WE ARE NOT LAWYERS SO YOU CAN DECIDE IF LYING TO POLICE SAYING A CLIENT OF YOURS HAD A SPECIFIC MAN COME TO HIS CLIENTS WORK (A HOSPITAL) WITH SPECIFIC MANS MOTHER AND GOT ARRESTED TRYING TO GET INTO THE FACILTIY ! THIS FALSE SCENARIO THAT IS EASILY RESEARCHED WITH ANY ARREST SEARCH, HE USED THS TO FRAME A MAN AS A STALKER TO ONE OF HIS CLIENTS THEN USED THIS SCENARIO TO SAY THIS SPECIFIC MAN IS NOT STALKING HIM USING A FALSE PATTER OF AN EVENT THAT NEVER HAPPENED WHICH LED TO SPECIFIC MAN RECEIVNG A FALSE CHARGE OF STALKING ON SPECIFIC MAN DUE TO PAUL TOEPELS PURJURY! Penal Code 118 PC – California Penalty of “Perjury” Law, Penal Code 115 PC – Filing a False Document in California, Penal Code 132 PC – Offering False Evidence, Penal Code 134 PC – Preparing False Evidence, Lying Cop or Citizen – PC 129 – Preparing False Statement or Report Under Oath, Penal Code 141 PC – Planting or Tampering with Evidence in California , Penal Code 148.5 PC – Making a False Police Report in California, WHICH THEN LED TO PC 146 Penal Code – False Arrest Misuse of the Warrant System – California Penal Code § 170 , Penal Code 182 PC – “Criminal Conspiracy” Laws & Penalties , Penal Code § 236 PC – False Imprisonment
WE BELIEVE HE HAS COMMITTED SOME SERIOUS CRIMES BELOW BUT WE ARE NOT LAWYERS SO YOU CAN DECIDE IF LYING TO POLICE SAYING A CLIENT OF YOURS HAD A SPECIFIC MAN COME TO HIS CLIENTS WORK (A HOSPITAL) WITH SPECIFIC MANS MOTHER AND GOT ARRESTED TRYING TO GET INTO THE FACILTIY ! THIS FALSE SCENARIO THAT IS EASILY RESEARCHED WITH ANY ARREST SEARCH, HE USED THS TO FRAME A MAN AS A STALKER TO ONE OF HIS CLIENTS THEN USED THIS SCENARIO TO SAY THIS SPECIFIC MAN IS NOT STALKING HIM USING A FALSE PATTER OF AN EVENT THAT NEVER HAPPENED WHICH LED TO SPECIFIC MAN RECEIVNG A FALSE CHARGE OF STALKING ON SPECIFIC MAN DUE TO PAUL TOEPELS PURJURY! Penal Code 118 PC – California Penalty of “Perjury” Law, Penal Code 115 PC – Filing a False Document in California, Penal Code 132 PC – Offering False Evidence, Penal Code 134 PC – Preparing False Evidence, Lying Cop or Citizen – PC 129 – Preparing False Statement or Report Under Oath, Penal Code 141 PC – Planting or Tampering with Evidence in California , Penal Code 148.5 PC – Making a False Police Report in California, WHICH THEN LED TO PC 146 Penal Code – False Arrest Misuse of the Warrant System – California Penal Code § 170 , Penal Code 182 PC – “Criminal Conspiracy” Laws & Penalties , Penal Code § 236 PC – False Imprisonment
READ IT, the police report BOYS! 028-077 GGPD #22022279 Page 9 GARDEN GROVE PD REPORT THEN DO YOU DUE DILLEGENCE AND HANCUFF MR TOEPEL FOR LEADING YOU ON WITH PERJURY! you got set up by an attorney for a tort claim officers, or you can just arrest him! PAUL TOEPEL is (should be was AND disbarred) a sworn officer of the courts. He has a duty to testify truthfully 100% in all paperwork leading to a court proceeding, and a police incident crime report would be just that! also Paul….. im sure, he had to sign his statement and that would have been under penalty of perjury REMINDER, as a sworn officer its REQUIRED TO BE TRUTHFUL no reminder necessary!
still comunicating with a person represented by an attorney 2/3/2025 this occured to an elderly 77 year old lady victim of 1 stroke and 2 aneurysms
still comunicating with a person represented by an attorney 2/3/2025 this occured to an elderly 84 year old man victim of 2 strokes
CLICK CLOWN VIDEO ABOVE TO HEAR WHAT HE REALLY WAS UP TO!
NOW WATCH THIS SCUM BAG DELLUSIONALLY OR INTENIONALLY LYING ABUOT HIS INTENT OF THE CALL ABOVE!
still being unfair to oppoing party below!
Will You Matter to me? Never! Will I matter to you? Everyday it seems!
Who has free rent inside your little weasel mind ? That you voluntarily give up due to lacking of control of you and your mind, your greed, your selfishness Paul it seems so sad to see you abuse elderly for things they made and you you still have no house from what i see! and with the traffic EPGR gets you all eat top ramen maybe not sure but their aint much moving on the net!
aside from perjury,
California Code, Penal Code – PEN § 182
Current as of January 01, 2023 | Updated by FindLaw Staff
(a) If two or more persons conspire:
(1) To commit any crime.
(2) Falsely and maliciously to indict another for any crime, or to procure another to be charged or arrested for any crime.
(3) Falsely to move or maintain any suit, action, or proceeding.
(4) To cheat and defraud any person of any property, by any means which are in themselves criminal, or to obtain money or property by false pretenses or by false promises with fraudulent intent not to perform those promises.
(5) To commit any act injurious to the public health, to public morals, or to pervert or obstruct justice, or the due administration of the laws.
(6) To commit any crime against the person of the President or Vice President of the United States, the Governor of any state or territory, any United States justice or judge, or the secretary of any of the executive departments of the United States.
They are punishable as follows:
When they conspire to commit any crime against the person of any official specified in paragraph (6), they are guilty of a felony and are punishable by imprisonment pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 1170 for five, seven, or nine years.
When they conspire to commit any other felony, they shall be punishable in the same manner and to the same extent as is provided for the punishment of that felony. If the felony is one for which different punishments are prescribed for different degrees, the jury or court which finds the defendant guilty thereof shall determine the degree of the felony the defendant conspired to commit. If the degree is not so determined, the punishment for conspiracy to commit the felony shall be that prescribed for the lesser degree, except in the case of conspiracy to commit murder, in which case the punishment shall be that prescribed for murder in the first degree.
If the felony is conspiracy to commit two or more felonies which have different punishments and the commission of those felonies constitute but one offense of conspiracy, the penalty shall be that prescribed for the felony which has the greater maximum term.
When they conspire to do an act described in paragraph (4), they shall be punishable by imprisonment in a county jail for not more than one year, or by imprisonment pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 1170, or by a fine not exceeding ten thousand dollars ($10,000), or by both that imprisonment and fine.
When they conspire to do any of the other acts described in this section, they shall be punishable by imprisonment in a county jail for not more than one year, or pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 1170, or by a fine not exceeding ten thousand dollars ($10,000), or by both that imprisonment and fine. When they receive a felony conviction for conspiring to commit identity theft, as defined in Section 530.5, the court may impose a fine of up to twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000).
All cases of conspiracy may be prosecuted and tried in the superior court of any county in which any overt act tending to effect the conspiracy shall be done.
(b) Upon a trial for conspiracy, in a case where an overt act is necessary to constitute the offense, the defendant cannot be convicted unless one or more overt acts are expressly alleged in the indictment or information, nor unless one of the acts alleged is proved; but other overt acts not alleged may be given in evidence.
WE BELIEVE HE HAS COMMITTED SOME SERIOUS CRIMES BELOW BUT WE ARE NOT LAWYERS SO YOU CAN DECIDE IF LYING TO POLICE SAYING A CLIENT OF YOURS HAD A SPECIFIC MAN COME TO HIS CLIENTS WORK (A HOSPITAL) WITH SPECIFIC MANS MOTHER AND GOT ARRESTED TRYING TO GET INTO THE FACILTIY ! THIS FALSE SCENARIO THAT IS EASILY RESEARCHED WITH ANY ARREST SEARCH, HE USED THS TO FRAME A MAN AS A STALKER TO ONE OF HIS CLIENTS THEN USED THIS SCENARIO TO SAY THIS SPECIFIC MAN IS NOT STALKING HIM USING A FALSE PATTER OF AN EVENT THAT NEVER HAPPENED WHICH LED TO SPECIFIC MAN RECEIVNG A FALSE CHARGE OF STALKING ON SPECIFIC MAN DUE TO PAUL TOEPELS PURJURY! Penal Code 118 PC – California Penalty of “Perjury” Law, Penal Code 115 PC – Filing a False Document in California, Penal Code 132 PC – Offering False Evidence, Penal Code 134 PC – Preparing False Evidence, Lying Cop or Citizen – PC 129 – Preparing False Statement or Report Under Oath, Penal Code 141 PC – Planting or Tampering with Evidence in California , Penal Code 148.5 PC – Making a False Police Report in California, WHICH THEN LED TO PC 146 Penal Code – False Arrest Misuse of the Warrant System – California Penal Code § 170 , Penal Code 182 PC – “Criminal Conspiracy” Laws & Penalties , Penal Code § 236 PC – False Imprisonment
click here to read the council minutes
Paul Toepel NO fireworks FUN FOR ANYONE is his request ban fireworks! its our opinion he thinks that adults are not comptetant and can NOT handle fun FIREWORKS safely
Non compos mentis “having control/mastery of one’s mind.” – meaning nothing can harm or influence ones mind that is sound and strong – if a man has a real mans personality one should re-read this line and call themself a man only after………. Non compos mentis “having control/mastery of one’s mind.”
Marriage of Willis v. Costa-Willis
IN RE: the Marriage of RICKY ALLAN WILLIS (2023)
That portion of the DVRO modifying the judgment’s joint legal and physical custody provisions to award Shauna sole legal and physical custody is reversed
The method used in my opinion by Paul D. Toepel is to SECURE DVRO against FATHER, then STRIP FATHER of visitation and rights to fatherhood.
A man named Philip is another one of his victims of this exact behavior.
in our opinion its a pattern
learn MORE:
These laws are permissible under the First Amendment if drafted in a way that meets the high bar set by the Supreme Court in a series of cases, starting with New York Times Co. v. Sullivan.
Learn what the Supreme Court View and Decision reagarding threats is True Threats – Virginia v. Black is most comprehensive Supreme Court definition – 1st Amendment and their decision to create a TRUE THREAT TEST Watts v. United States – True Threat Test – 1st Amendment
also hating an individual is not illegal Supreme Court unanimously reaffirms: There is “NO HATE SPEECH’ exception to the First Amendment
and literature that has words that may bother you, the lines of threats are drawn here Counterman v. Colorado – Supreme Court sets higher bar for prosecuting threats under First Amendment
The Consumer Review Fairness Act – What It Is & Why It Matters
Publius v. Boyer-Vine – 1st Amendment- Posting Police or citizens private real Address
Right to Record Government Officials Engaged in the Exercise of their Official Duties
Those were Bar and Business Code Violations
(with Penal attachments for code violation)
Rule 3.1 Meritorious Claims and Contentions
Rule 1.1 Competence
Rule 5-100 Threatening Criminal, Administrative, or Disciplinary Charges Caitly had her CHUMP PUNK PIG ABUSE BRUCE BLANK (BRAIN DEAD MORON)
Rule 3.3 Candor Toward the Tribunal
(1) Make a false statement of fact or law to a tribunal or fail to correct a false statement of material fact or law previously made to the tribunal by the lawyer;
(2) Fail to disclose to the tribunal legal authority in the controlling jurisdiction known to the lawyer to be directly adverse to the position of the client and not disclosed by opposing counsel; or
(3) Offer evidence that the lawyer knows to be false. If a lawyer, the lawyer’s client or a witness called by the lawyer has offered material evidence and the lawyer comes to know of its falsity, the lawyer shall take reasonable remedial measures, including, if necessary, disclosure to the tribunal. A lawyer may refuse to offer evidence, other than the testimony of a defendant in a criminal matter that the lawyer reasonably believes is false.
Rule 4.1 Truthfulness in Statements to Others I HAVE ATTACHED ALL HIS LIES
Truthfulness in Statements to Others also covers the duty of candor. He actually tells statements he knows to be false which is not allowed even when protecting confidentiality
Rules 1.2.1 [Advising or Assisting the Violation of Law) HE HELPED NIGEL STAY IN HOME
Rule 8.4 Misconduct
- Business and Professions Code section 6106 discipline per Business and Professions Code section 6106 “for acts involving moral turpitude, dishonesty, or corruption, whether intentional, reckless, or grossly negligent.”
[1] A lawyer is required to be truthful when dealing with others on a client’s behalf, but generally has no affirmative duty to inform an opposing party of relevant facts. A misrepresentation can occur if the lawyer incorporates or affirms a statement of another person that the lawyer knows is false. Misrepresentations can also occur by partially true but misleading statements or omissions that are the equivalent of affirmative false statements. For dishonest conduct that does not amount to a false statement or for misrepresentations by a lawyer other than in the course of representing a client,Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 6106 I HAVE ATTACHED ALL HIS LIES to the family law case 17FL000138 which the courts will be getting soon again OCT 2022
Moral Turpitude: Deceit, Dishonesty, Half-Truths Under California law, most forms of deceit and dishonesty by an attorney are considered acts of moral turpitude, according to the State Bar. Under Business & Professions Code § 6106, the commission of any act of moral turpitude constitutes cause for disbarment from the practice of law.
Ca. Bus. and Proof’s. Code § 6106 California Business and Professions Code section 6106, which permits State Bar discipline for actions involving dishonesty (among other things) whether or not a licensed lawyer is practicing law I HAVE ATTACHED ALL HIS LIES
Added by Stats. 1939, Ch. 34.
Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 6106 “The commission of any act involving moral turpitude, dishonesty, or corruption whether the act is committed in the course of his relations as an attorney, and whether the act is a felony or misdemeanor or not, constitutes a cause for disbarment or suspension.” (Emphasis added.) “Moral turpitude” has been defined by the California Supreme Court as “anything done contrary to justice or honesty.” See Bryant v. State Bar of California (1942) 21 Cal.2d 285. - Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 6128 I HAVE ATTACHED ALL HIS LIES
Every attorney is guilty of a misdemeanor who either: Is guilty of any deceit or collusion, or consents to any deceit or collusion, with intent to deceive the court or any party. This actually imposes misdemeanor criminal liability on a lawyer who engages in or consents to any deceit or collusion “with intent to deceive the court or any party.” (BP 6128(a)) Punishment for violating this section is up to a six-month jail sentence or a fine of up to $2,500 or both (Emphasis added.).
The B&P Code governs the conduct of all lawyers, no matter what area or type of practice involved. Read together, the above-referenced sections make it clear that as officers of the court, sworn to “preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution” as all must be in order to practice law in the State of California, lawyers are required to be truthful in all of their dealings or be guilty of a misdemeanor. This isn’t a “fine line” — it is black letter law. An attorney who is guilty of criminal conduct — whether misdemeanor or felony — can be assured that it will negatively affect their ability to practice law going forward. - Rule 3-200 Prohibited Objectives of Employment
A member shall not seek, accept, or continue employment if the member knows or should know that the objective of such employment is:
- To bring an action, conduct a defense, assert a position in litigation, or take an appeal, without probable cause and for the purpose of harassing or maliciously injuring any person; or
- To present a claim or defense in litigation that is not warranted under existing law, unless it can be supported by a good faith argument for an extension, modification, or reversal of such existing law.
Id. at Rule 3-200; see also Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 6068.Subsection (c) provides that an attorney must counsel only just actions or defenses except if the client is charged with a public offense. Subsection (d) embodies the duty of candor and provides that may only do such things that are consistent with the truth. A violation of these rules could subject the attorney to suspension or disbarment. Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 6103. - California Rule of Professional Conduct 5-200, Trial Conduct, states that in presenting a matter to a tribunal, a member:
-
-
- Shall employ, for the purpose of maintaining the causes confided to the member, such means only as are consistent with truth; told the court Nigel has moved out even though I had emailed him surveillance and I presented to the court evidence contrary to his statements he denied my claims and mislead the court and bold face lied to them
- Shall not seek to mislead the judge, judicial officer or jury by an artifice or false statement of fact or law; told through suggestion to the judge by not returning my son who fears moms home that I am kidnapping my son, even though I have police incident reports I show up to each exchange and the child refuses to go even after speaking with the sheriff and he said I put a gun to my sons head
- Shall not intentionally misquote to a tribunal the language of a book, statute or decision; he did this by telling the court flat out lies on several instances including misleading by misquoting the tribunal decision previously the CONTENTS OF THE JUDGES ORDER TO PROTECT MY SON. Mr. Toepel also told the courts this with vexatious litigant told the court I fit the criteria which is lying and misleading the Tribunal. Mr. Toepel had the court make an erroneous decision and declare me a Vexatious litigant. I NEVER FIT ANY CRITERIA! Code of Civil Procedure section 391(b) clearly states – Vexatious litigant requires in a 7-year period maintained in propria persona at least 5 litigations other than small claims court that has been finally determined adversely to the person. I have exactly 0 cases that fall into this classification. I have testimony from Mr. Toepel via transcripts of numerous attempts to mislead the judge to declare me a vexatious litigant
- he used this order to criminally cause issues for me and still completely lock me out of communication and the ability to fight for my rights to fatherhood he helps take from me by grossly misleading to the court on every occasion he attended
- Shall not, knowing its invalidity, cite as authority a decision that has been overruled or a statute that has been repealed or declared unconstitutional; and he tried to seek a restraining order against flyer distribution which is my 1st amendment rights to send out regarding information that is factual news about members of the community (judge denied him)
He attempts to get restraining orders one for himself and one for his client he received both under a complete lie and false pretenses. He misleads the court about the physical danger he and his client were in. Never once did I threaten their physical safety however I did exercise my 1st amendment rights, my freedom of speech allows me to complain on Google Reveiws, Yelp, and any supervisory person incharge of either their license of them if they are in commission of a violation of their sworn duties. I cannot be prevent or punished from complaining unless they are fake or false. He also told the court that he will communicate with me, as I am PRO PER, for legal matters only if the judge issues the restraining order, he issued it and I tried communicating over 50 times via email and voice message to no avail. He lied to the issuing judge and used this order to criminally cause issues for me and still completely lock me out of communication and the ability to fight for my rights to fatherhood he helps take from me by grossly misleading to the court on every occasion he attended
Rule 5-200 provides that an attorney will present in front of the court using only those means that are consistent with the truth and shall not act to mislead the judge, judicial officer or jury through a false statement of the law or fact, nor shall the attorney intentionally misquote a source or knowingly cite invalid authority.
Cal. Rule of Prof. Conduct 5-200 provides that “[i]n presenting a matter to a tribunal, a member: (b) shall not seek to mislead the judge, judicial officer, or jury by an artifice or false statement of fact or law.” See also Mendez v. Superior Court, 162 Cal. App.4th 827 (2009) (observing that “‘“ [c]ounsel should not forget that they are officers of the court, and while it is their duty to protect and defend the interests of their clients, the obligation is equally imperative to aid the court in avoiding error and in determining the cause in accordance with justice and the established rules of practice.”’”)
Id. at Rule 5-200. For a discussion of the duty of candor, and its application in questions about witnesses, client perjury, and citing authority, see Wendy Patrick Mazzarella, Lawyer’s Duty of Candor: Zealous representation can lead attorneys down a slippery slope right up to the ethical edge, CALIFORNIA BAR JOURNAL (April 2007), available at https://archive.calbar.ca.gov/archive/Archive.aspx?articleId=84844&categoryId=84645&month=4&year=2007If you are reading this in print and the link is too hard I have shortened it with a link shortening service by TINYURL in which will redirect you too the actual CALBAR link above https://tinyurl.com/truthcalbarCal. Rules Prof. Conduct, 5-200.
People v. Davis, 48 Cal.2d 241, 257 (1957); In re Branch, 70 Cal.2d 200, 210-211 (1969); Cal. Penal Code § 127. “Every person who willfully procures another person to commit perjury is guilty of subornation of perjury. . . .” and may be punished as if he had perjured himself, which includes a prison term of two, three or four years. Cal. Penal Code §§ 126-27. 475 U.S. 157 (where defendant, in presenting claim of self-defense shortly before trial that he’d seen something metallic in the victim’s hand and told his attorney that “[i]f I don’t say I saw a gun, I’m dead”, the defendant did not render ineffective assistance of counsel when he told his client he would tell the court and withdraw as his attorney if the client so perjured himself; the client did not present the perjured testimony as was convicted).
Nix, supra 475 U.S. at 169-70.
People v. Johnson, 62 Cal.App.4th 608 (1998) (finding it error when attorney told court he had an “ethical conflict” calling him as a witness and the court prevented the defendant from testifying).
Cal. Rules Prof. Conduct 3-310(B)(4) provides that an attorney can’t accept or continue representation of a client without providing written disclosure when has or has had legal, business, financial or professional interest in the subject matter of the representation.
ABA Model Rules 4.1(a) (2008).
ABA Model Rules 4.1 cmt. 2 (2008).
Cal. Evid. Code § 1126. 17 ABA Model Rules 3.3(a)(2) (2008).
-
-
- 26 U.S. Code § 7206 – Fraud and false statements learn at Cornell Lawhere
- perjury when Paul Toepel attorney of law perjured himself in court Perjury – California Penal Code 118 PC describes perjury as knowingly providing false testimony while under oath, which is a felony offense punishable by up to four years in jail.
- CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT LAW
State Bar Court decision, In the Matter of Maloney and Virsik:
“[The attorneys] committed acts of moral turpitude in wilful violation of section 6106 by knowingly making repeated misrepresentations to the Superior Court. It is well established that acts of moral turpitude include an attorney’s false or misleading statements to a court or tribunal…The actual intent to deceive is not necessary…Acts of moral turpitude include concealment as well as affirmative misrepresentations…
[N]o distinction can be drawn among concealment, half-truth, and false statement of fact…Also, it is not necessary that [the attorneys] actually succeeded in perpetrating a fraud on the court…These [court] pleadings were permeated with half-truths, omissions, and outright misstatements of fact and law. The Supreme Court has denounced such misleading conduct and has not hesitated to impose discipline in such cases.”
Lawyers have always had a duty to be honest and truthful pursuant to general ethical principles, as well as the State Bar Act. The newest version of the Rules of Professional Conduct, effective November 1, 2018, provides more specific guidance to lawyers relative to this duty. Rules 1.2.1, 1.6, 3.4, 4.1, 4.2, 4.3,7.1 through 7.5, and 8.4 are all implicated in this duty, as well as Business & Professions Code (“B&P”) sections 6068(d), 6106, and 6128, among others. This discussion will focus on the B&P Code sections, violations of which constitute cause for disbarment or other State Bar sanction, including but not limited to suspension, fines, and re-taking the Professional Responsibility examination.
Lawyers are required to be truthful not only in dealing with the court and parties in litigation, but also in transactional matters and document preparation. Violations by a lawyer of these requirements can result in not only liability in tort — to one’s own client as well as opposing parties and counsel — but also in State Bar discipline.
The B&P Code is the source that allows the State Bar to prosecute lawyers for violations of ethical requirements, and section 6068 contains a long list of an attorney’s duties: “It is the duty of an attorney to do all of the following: …
(d) to employ, for the purpose of meeting the causes confided to him or her those means only as are consistent with truth, and never to seek to mislead the judgeor any judicial officer by an artifice or false statement of fact or law. (Emphasis added.)
Opposing lawyers, as “officers of the court”, are duty-bound to not only tell the truth, but not to omit information that would cause the court or opposing counsel to be misled. This applies not only to litigated matters, but to “all causes confided to him or her”. See Shafer v. Berger, Kahn, et al. (2003) 107 Cal.App.4th 54 for a lengthy discussion of attorney misrepresentations which were determined to be fraudulent, including statements made by counsel during settlement negotiations.
WE BELIEVE HE HAS COMMITTED SOME SERIOUS CRIMES BELOW BUT WE ARE NOT LAWYERS SO YOU CAN DECIDE IF LYING TO POLICE SAYING A CLIENT OF YOURS HAD A SPECIFIC MAN COME TO HIS CLIENTS WORK (A HOSPITAL) WITH SPECIFIC MANS MOTHER AND GOT ARRESTED TRYING TO GET INTO THE FACILTIY ! THIS FALSE SCENARIO THAT IS EASILY RESEARCHED WITH ANY ARREST SEARCH, HE USED THS TO FRAME A MAN AS A STALKER TO ONE OF HIS CLIENTS THEN USED THIS SCENARIO TO SAY THIS SPECIFIC MAN IS NOT STALKING HIM USING A FALSE PATTER OF AN EVENT THAT NEVER HAPPENED WHICH LED TO SPECIFIC MAN RECEIVNG A FALSE CHARGE OF STALKING ON SPECIFIC MAN DUE TO PAUL TOEPELS PURJURY! Penal Code 118 PC – California Penalty of “Perjury” Law, Penal Code 115 PC – Filing a False Document in California, Penal Code 132 PC – Offering False Evidence, Penal Code 134 PC – Preparing False Evidence, Lying Cop or Citizen – PC 129 – Preparing False Statement or Report Under Oath, Penal Code 141 PC – Planting or Tampering with Evidence in California , Penal Code 148.5 PC – Making a False Police Report in California, WHICH THEN LED TO PC 146 Penal Code – False Arrest Misuse of the Warrant System – California Penal Code § 170 , Penal Code 182 PC – “Criminal Conspiracy” Laws & Penalties , Penal Code § 236 PC – False Imprisonment
Anti-SLAPP Law in California
Freedom of Assembly – Peaceful Assembly – 1st Amendment Right
Counterman v. Colorado – Supreme Court sets higher bar for prosecuting threats under First Amendment
We also have the The Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969) – 1st Amendment
CURRENT TEST = We also have the The ‘Brandenburg test’ for incitement to violence – 1st Amendment
We also have the The Incitement to Imminent Lawless Action Test– 1st Amendment
We also have the True Threats – Virginia v. Black is most comprehensive Supreme Court definition – 1st Amendment
We also have the Watts v. United States – True Threat Test – 1st Amendment
We also have the Clear and Present Danger Test – 1st Amendment
We also have the Gravity of the Evil Test – 1st Amendment
We also have the Elonis v. United States (2015) – Threats – 1st Amendment
Learn More About What is Obscene…. be careful about education it may enlighten you
We also have the Miller v. California – 3 Prong Obscenity Test (Miller Test) – 1st Amendment
We also have the Obscenity and Pornography – 1st Amendment
Penal Code 115 PC – Filing a False Document in California
Penal Code 118 PC – California Penalty of “Perjury” Law
Federal Perjury – Definition by Law
Penal Code 132 PC – Offering False Evidence
Penal Code 134 PC – Preparing False Evidence
Crimes Against Public Justice
Penal Code 118.1 PC – Police Officer$ Filing False Report$
Spencer v. Peters– Police Fabrication of Evidence – 14th Amendment
Lying Cop or Citizen – PC 129 – Preparing False Statement or Report Under Oath
Penal Code 132 PC – Offering False Evidence
Penal Code 134 PC – Preparing False Evidence
Penal Code 135 PC – Destroying or Concealing Evidence
Lying Cop or Citizen – PC 129 – Preparing False Statement or Report Under Oath
Penal Code 141 PC – Planting or Tampering with Evidence in California
Penal Code 142 PC – Peace Officer Refusing to Arrest or Receive Person Charged with Criminal Offense
PC 146 Penal Code – False Arrest
Penal Code 148.5 PC – Making a False Police Report in California
Misuse of the Warrant System – California Penal Code § 170
Penal Code 182 PC – “Criminal Conspiracy” Laws & Penalties
Penal Code § 236 PC – False Imprisonment
Penal Code 664 PC – “Attempted Crimes” in California
Penal Code 31 PC – Aiding and Abetting Laws
Penal Code 32 PC – Accessory After the Fact
What is Abuse of Process?
What is a Due Process Violation? – 4th Amendment & 14th Amendment
What’s the Difference between Abuse of Process, Malicious Prosecution and False Arrest?
This also violates the CIVILITY rule as opinion also entails these violations:
- Rule 8.4 Misconduct
- Rule 8.4.1 Prohibited Discrimination, Harassment and Retaliation
- Rule 9.7. Oath required when admitted to practice law As an officer of the court, I will strive to conduct myself at all times with dignity, courtesy, and integrity.”
- Rule 1.2.1 Advising or Assisting the Violation of Law
- Rule 1.3: Diligence
- Rule 2.122. Conduct Towards Other Attorneys, the Court and Participants
- Rule 4.1 Truthfulness in statement to others
- California Rule of Professional Conduct 5-200(B) prohibits lawyers from misleading a judge, judicial officer, or jury by artifice or false statement . Rule 5-200 also requires lawyers to use means that are consistent with truth.
- Business and Professions Code § 6106 – Dishonesty, whether or not committed while acting as an attorney, is considered an act of moral turpitude and is prohibited.
- California Code, Business and Professions Code – BPC § 6068It is the duty of an attorney to do all of the following:
- To support the Constitution and laws of the United States and of this state.
- To maintain the respect due to the courts of justice and judicial officers.
- To counsel or maintain those actions, proceedings, or defenses only
WHAT TO KNOW ABOUT THE TRUTH CLICK HERE TO LEARN MORE
discipline is a state of mind that starts with core values not a closed mouth!
a disciplined man mind and body is strong and fit
they control cravings wether drugs or food or sex or gambling
vices are for no man
YOU SUCK DUE TO THE FOOD YOU FEED YOUR MIND AND THE KARMA THAT FOLLOWS LYING MANIPULATORS.. a NON-FAMOUS man said!
FOOD FOR THOUGHT
