SB 393: The Consumer Arrest Record Equity Act
SB 393: The Consumer Arrest Record Equity Act
The good news is that on October 12, 2017, the California Legislature passed Senate Bill 393, the Consumer Arrest Record Equity (CARE) Act, which offers help for those arrested but not convicted of a crime. This new law will take effect on January 1, 2018.
The CARE Act added Section 851.91 to the California Penal Code. Using the new procedures outlined in this statute, a person who was arrested but ultimately not convicted of a crime may now petition the court to have his or her California arrest record completely expunged.
Who qualifies for expungement under the CARE Act?
California Penal Code Section 851.91 now provides a mechanism to seal most open arrest records. Expungement is now allowed for any past “arrest” where that arrest “did not end in a conviction.”
The CARE Act defines the phrase, “did not end in a conviction” as meaning one of the following scenarios:
- An arrest was made, but no charges were ever filed against the person.
- Charges were filed, but no conviction occurred because the charges were later dismissed.
- Charges were filed, but the individual was acquitted at a jury or court trial.
- An individual was convicted of a crime, but that conviction was later reversed or vacated on appeal.
The new statute does not define “arrest.” In most cases, it will be obvious that a person was arrested. However, there may still be some open questions for the courts to later rule on. (For example, whether the statute applies to someone who was arrested by way of a citation as opposed to being physically booked.)
In any event, millions of people who were arrested in California may now be entitled to completely expunge their criminal record.
Who does not qualify for expungement under the CARE Act?
There are limits to this new expungement law. A person is not eligible to seal their arrest record under California Penal Code Section 851.91 if any of the following circumstances applies:
- He or she could still be charged with any of the offenses upon which the arrest was based. (In other words, the Statute of Limitations has not run out, or the case could be refiled by the DA for any reason)
- The person was charged with Murder or any other serious offense where there is no Statute of Limitations, except when the person has been acquitted or found factually innocent of the charges.
- The person “intentionally evaded” law enforcement efforts to prosecute the arrest. (For example, by absconding from the jurisdiction in which the arrest took place)
- The person, “intentionally evaded” law enforcement efforts to prosecute the arrest by engaging in identity fraud and was subsequently charged with a crime for that act of identity fraud.
What about California’s Statute of Limitations?
The California CARE Act does not apply if charges can still be filed by the District Attorney’s office. This question usually depends on whether or not the Statute of Limitations (also known as the SOL) has run on the charges that could have been filed from the arrest.
The Statute of Limitations in California is normally based on the severity of the penalty for the crime. The most common SOL rules are as follows:
- Misdemeanors – Generally a 1 year SOL from the offense date.
- General Felonies – The SOL is normally 3 years. (California PC 801)
- More Serious Felonies – For felonies punishable by state prison for eight years or more, the SOL is 6 years from the commission of the offense. (California PC 800)
There are many exceptions and variables to these general rules. For a number of crimes against children, the SOL is “tolled” (doesn’t start) until the child is 21 years old. There are also major exceptions to the California Statute of Limitations when it comes to sex crimes.
Finally, not all crimes are even governed by a Statute of Limitations. For example, there is no Statute of Limitations for murder or other extremely serious crimes. California PC 799 states that “Prosecution for an offense punishable by death or by imprisonment in the state prison for life or for life without the possibility of parole, or for the embezzlement of public money, may be commenced at any time.”
As you can see, this is a complex area of the law and it is often wise to consult with an expungement lawyer as to the exact SOL that applies for an arrest.
Are there any exceptions to California SB 393?
In general, a petition to seal an arrest record brought under this statute is supposed to be granted by the judge as a “matter of right.” In other words, if someone qualifies under one of the four categories for record sealing under California Penal Code Section 851.91(1), they are entitled to have their arrest record sealed automatically.
However, when the legislature was passing California Senate Bill 393, they did not want to guarantee that persons with a lengthy criminal history could automatically seal their arrest record. Therefore, in certain circumstances the person making the application has to also show that the decision to seal their arrest record would also be, “In the interests of Justice.”
The California CARE Act requires this additional showing for any persons whose criminal history demonstrates a “pattern” of domestic violence, child abuse, or elder abuse.
California Penal Code 859.91 (2)(A)(ii) defines “a pattern” as meaning two or more convictions, or five or more arrests, for separate offenses occurring on separate occasions within three years from at least one of the other convictions or arrests.
In determining whether the interests of justice would be served by sealing an arrest record in this situation, the court may consider numerous relevant factors. These include, but are not limited to: hardship to the petitioner caused by the arrest, evidence that the petitioner has rehabilitated and is now a person of good character, or other evidence about the facts and circumstances of the arrest.
Effects of an expungement under California SB 393
If the record of your arrest has been sealed under this section, your arrest is deemed, “not to have occurred.” That means you can answer, “No” to the question of whether you’ve ever been arrested.
There are still a few areas in which the arrest can still be used even when sealed:
- The sealed arrest may still be alleged as a “prior conviction.” For example, in DUI cases.
- A person who has their arrest record sealed must still disclose the arrest in response to any direct question contained in a questionnaire or application for public office, for employment as a peace officer, for licensure by any state or local agency, or for contracting with the California State Lottery Commission.
- The sealing of an arrest pursuant to this section does not affect a person’s rights when it comes to their right to own, possess, or have in his or her custody or control any firearm.
- The sealing of an arrest pursuant to this section does not affect any prohibition from holding public office that would otherwise apply under law as a result of the arrest.
Information needed to seal your arrest record in California
California Penal Code Section 851.91 requires that the following information be included in a petition to seal an arrest record:
- The petitioner’s name and date of birth.
- The date of the arrest for which sealing is sought.
- The city and county where the arrest took place.
- The law enforcement agency that made the arrest.
- Any other information that will help “identify the arrest” in question. Examples might be the police report case number or the booking number that was used by the prosecuting attorney when reviewing the arrest.
- A list of the offenses upon which the arrest was based or, if an accusatory pleading was filed based on the arrest, the charges in the accusatory pleading.
- A statement as to whether the petitioner is entitled to have his or her arrest sealed as a matter of right or is requesting to have his or her arrest sealed in the interests of justice. If one is asking that the motion be granted “in the interest of justice” additional declarations are needed explaining how the interests of justice would be served by granting the petition.
Cleaning Up Your Record
Penal Code 851.8 PC – Certificate of Factual Innocence in California
SB 393: The Consumer Arrest Record Equity Act – 851.87-851.92 & 1000.4-11105 – CARE ACT
Expungement California – How to Clear Criminal Records Under Penal Code 1203.4 PC
Cleaning Up Your Criminal Record in California (focus OC County)
Governor Pardons Click Here for the Details
How to Get a Sentence Commuted (Executive Clemency) in California
How to Reduce a Felony to a Misdemeanor – Penal Code 17b PC Motion
BILL START
SB 393, Lara. Arrests: sealing.
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST
DIGEST KEY
Vote: majority Appropriation: no Fiscal Committee: yes Local Program: yes
BILL TEXT
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
SEC 1.
Section 851.87 of the Penal Code is amended to read:
851.87.
(a) (1) In any case where a person is arrested and successfully completes a prefiling diversion program administered by a prosecuting attorney in lieu of filing an accusatory pleading, the person may petition the superior court that would have had jurisdiction over the matter to issue an order to seal the records pertaining to an arrest and the court may order those records sealed as described in Section 851.92. A copy of the petition shall be served on the law enforcement agency and the prosecuting attorney of the county or city having jurisdiction over the offense, who may request a hearing within 60 days of receipt of the petition. The court may hear the matter no less than 60 days from the date the law enforcement agency and the prosecuting attorney receive a copy of the petition. The prosecuting attorney and the law enforcement agency, through the prosecuting attorney, may present evidence to the court at the hearing.
SEC. 2.
Section 851.90 of the Penal Code is amended to read:
851.90.
(a) (1) Whenever a person is diverted pursuant to a drug diversion program administered by a superior court pursuant to Section 1000.5 or is admitted to a deferred entry of judgment program pursuant to Section 1000 or 1000.8, and the person successfully completes the program, the judge may order those records pertaining to the arrest to be sealed as described in Section 851.92, upon the written or oral motion of any party in the case, or upon the court’s own motion, and with notice to all parties in the case.
SEC. 3.
Section 851.91 is added to the Penal Code, immediately following Section 851.90, to read:
851.91.
(a) A person who has suffered an arrest that did not result in a conviction may petition the court to have his or her arrest and related records sealed, as described in Section 851.92.
SEC. 4.
Section 851.92 is added to the Penal Code, to read:
851.92.
(a) This section applies when an arrest record is sealed pursuant to Sections 851.87, 851.90, 851.91, 1000.4, and 1001.9.
SEC. 5.
Section 1000.4 of the Penal Code is amended to read:
1000.4.
(a) Any record filed with the Department of Justice shall indicate the disposition in those cases deferred pursuant to this chapter. Upon successful completion of a deferred entry of judgment program, the arrest upon which the judgment was deferred shall be deemed to have never occurred and the court may issue an order to seal the records pertaining to the arrest as described in Section 851.92. The defendant may indicate in response to any question concerning his or her prior criminal record that he or she was not arrested or granted deferred entry of judgment for the offense, except as specified in subdivision (b). A record pertaining to an arrest resulting in successful completion of a deferred entry of judgment program shall not, without the defendant’s consent, be used in any way that could result in the denial of any employment, benefit, license, or certificate.
SEC. 5.5.
Section 1000.4 of the Penal Code is amended to read:
1000.4.
(a) Any record filed with the Department of Justice shall indicate the disposition in those cases referred to pretrial diversion pursuant to this chapter. Upon successful completion of a pretrial diversion program, the arrest upon which the defendant was diverted shall be deemed to have never occurred and the court may issue an order to seal the records pertaining to the arrest as described in Section 851.92. The defendant may indicate in response to any question concerning his or her prior criminal record that he or she was not arrested or granted pretrial diversion for the offense, except as specified in subdivision (c). A record pertaining to an arrest resulting in successful completion of a pretrial diversion program shall not, without the defendant’s consent, be used in any way that could result in the denial of any employment, benefit, license, or certificate, except that, as specified in Section 492 of the Business and Professions Code, successful completion of a pretrial diversion program shall not prohibit any agency established under Division 2 (commencing with Section 500) of the Business and Professions Code, or any initiative act referred to in that division, from taking disciplinary action against a licensee or from denying a license for professional misconduct, notwithstanding that evidence of that misconduct may be recorded in a record pertaining to an arrest leading to successful completion of a pretrial diversion program.
SEC. 6.
Section 1001.9 of the Penal Code is amended to read:
1001.9.
(a) Any record filed with the Department of Justice shall indicate the disposition in those cases diverted pursuant to this chapter. Upon successful completion of a diversion program, the arrest upon which the diversion was based shall be deemed to have never occurred and the court may issue an order to seal the records pertaining to the arrest as described in Section 851.92. The divertee may indicate in response to any question concerning his or her prior criminal record that he or she was not arrested or diverted for the offense, except as specified in subdivision (b). A record pertaining to an arrest resulting in successful completion of a diversion program shall not, without the divertee’s consent, be used in any way that could result in the denial of any employment, benefit, license, or certificate.
SEC. 7.
Section 11105 of the Penal Code is amended to read:
11105.
(a) (1) The Department of Justice shall maintain state summary criminal history information.
SEC. 7.1.
Section 11105 of the Penal Code is amended to read:
11105.
(a) (1) The Department of Justice shall maintain state summary criminal history information.
SEC. 7.2.
Section 11105 of the Penal Code is amended to read:
11105.
(a) (1) The Department of Justice shall maintain state summary criminal history information.
SEC. 7.3.
Section 11105 of the Penal Code is amended to read:
11105.
(a) (1) The Department of Justice shall maintain state summary criminal history information.
SEC. 8.
Section 5.5 of this bill incorporates amendments to Section 1000.4 of the Penal Code proposed by both this bill and Assembly Bill 208. That section shall only become operative if (1) both bills are enacted and become effective on or before January 1, 2018, (2) each bill amends Section 1000.4 of the Penal Code, and (3) this bill is enacted after Assembly Bill 208, in which case Section 5 of this bill shall not become operative.
SEC. 9.
(a) Section 7.1 of this bill incorporates amendments to Section 11105 of the Penal Code proposed by both this bill and Senate Bill 420. That section shall only become operative if (1) both bills are enacted and become effective on or before January 1, 2018, (2) each bill amends Section 11105 of the Penal Code, and (3) Assembly Bill 1418 is not enacted or as enacted does not amend that section, and (4) this bill is enacted after Senate Bill 420, in which case Sections 7, 7.2 and 7.3 of this bill shall not become operative.
SEC. 10.
If the Commission on State Mandates determines that this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division 4 of Title 2 of the Government Code.